If you lower your standards, a partner can be found.
Stephen Hawking was married. Can you compete with a petty, twisted cripple?
(I both kind of want to know how that works...and rather don't.)
Every incel is a volcel. The question is whether they're keeping their standards high for good reasons or bad reasons. For some, especially males, a partner isn't worth very much. The marginal value of an average American woman is close to 0. Yes, they can get a below-average woman, but then she's worth less than nothing. A partner can be found, but at some point you're trading on desperation rather than attraction. (Reminder that femcels can get sex, but not commitment. They can put out, but can't get it back. Only pathetically heinous femcels can't even get sex. Otherwise it's the same dynamic.)
However, that's not women rejecting them, that's them rejecting women. While indeed the positive-value women are rejecting them, well, if it wasn't contradictory and self-defeating we wouldn't call it crazy. Very American to think you deserve something because you want it. For some reason, children who never grow up can't get sex...
Rather, children who never grow up manifest their lack of desire for sex, one way or another. Obediently being infantilized, just like they're told. I'm sure the good kiddies will get the marshmallow they were promised. Any day now.
4 comments:
>Can you compete with a petty, twisted cripple?
First wife : Met in college in the 60's, when being a super genius was valued by women.
Second wife : He had significant social status.
>femcels can get sex, but not commitment
It works in reverse for men. Incels can find a woman to commit to, but not sex.
>pathetically heinous femcels can't even get sex.
That woman off 1000lb sisters gets more action than some guys I know who are completely healthy and normal. How heinous would one have to be?
Anyway I'm not even presenting an argument here, let me regroup.
Theres a sex/commitment economy.
Women trade sex for commitment, men trade commitment for sex.
( I'm ultra simplifying this obviously, and I would say most people unconsciously characterise "sex" as a proxy for "having a child". Commitment additionally is socially bound - theres a reason for example that very ugly very rich men can only get south east asian women - the women want to be taken away from their social groups to avoid shame.)
There are some men whose commitment is worth so little they can't trade it for sex. But they can still give it away.
Similarly there are women who aren't worth committing to, but can still give away the sex.
>Every incel is a volcel.
>If you lower your standards, a partner can be found.
I disagree with these generalisations. There's a floor for male attractiveness- there are some men that prostitutes won't have sex with. It's kind of like the IQ spectrum - and I don't imagine you believe that "anyone can be trained to do anything".
Don't get me wrong, I agree that many people who whine could improve themselves, and whining doesn't help.
But the problem space is pretty complicated.
Eg, as women enter the workforce, by "having their own money" their need for commitment lowers, which increases the relative price of their sex.
Porn additionally increases the "price" for commitment. So on.
Naw, it's simple.
All those complexities do exist, but are irrelevant or cancel out.
Whores will sell their colostomy holes. Some hookers will reject some johns, but this isn't a proof that all hookers reject some johns.
Post a Comment