It's cute that Outsideness thinks the substack censorship is about discouraging a market competitor.
>"Twitter disabling retweets with [unmentionable] links is like a
professional darts player stabbing himself in the eyeball to put his
competitors off."
https://nitter.unixfox.eu/outsideness/status/1644346032724013057
Why would a theocracy allow unlicensed preachers to get paid? The only wrinkle is that a Satanism theocracy has to go to great lengths to avoid being seen as shutting down a place like substack for heresy. You can't commit heresy while carrying out your inquisitorial duties. That's counterproductive.
Substack allows the electorate to signal, using a trustworthy monetary signal, which preachers they prefer. In a Democracy, the Pope is the most popular, by definition. Don't trust your lying eyes; any evidence the Pope is unpopular is itself heresy.
The only difference is that Christ!Satanists thought heresy was sometimes actually bad for you, not just the Church, whereas Woke!Satanists are aware heresy is uniformly better for you than the catechism, and it's 100% about inflicting harm to prove they can.
No comments:
Post a Comment