Highly accurate, though you still need more background to avoid getting deceived.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/JU_8fJjtGxA
Calling it meritocracy is disingenuous. [Dissociation] is demonic possession. They specifically select for psyches so destroyed they match the blank slate hypothesis. Nobody's home. Power addicts lust for the easily controlled.
The reason [dissociated] psyches change so easily is that one possessing spirit gets evicted by another. Devil infighting. They're genuinely, literally, scientifically, a different person. The obama sworn in for 2008 did not bodily survive to 2016. Not the same guy.
Terry brooks, in wishsong, comes up with shadowen. https://shannara.fandom.com/wiki/Shadowen Except he claims they lost. Didn't. Also, claims they're fantasy.
Meritocracy is fameocracy. The [[merit]] is [[shows up in newspapers]]. The term [success] measured entirely by how many can recognize you.
At one point he says only ~1% of harvard admits are [[[meritocratic]]], meaning 99% are filler or entrenched interests keeping themselves entrenched. I.e. business as usual for all of known history. Is meritocracy lindy, or is harvard not meritocratic?
Can you name any of these legacy silver-spoon admits? The 1% act as cover for the 99%. Fame as a disease, which harvard inoculates most graduates against.
He says rich folk aren't necessarily smart, but that is in fact untrue. If you can remain rich, you're smart. A fool and his money. Thus; harvard is clever. It portrays itself as a fame whore, exactly the opposite of what it is.
Super clever. The camouflage is only one primary function. The other is, by portraying itself as the school of the famous, it creates a traumatizing culture, as p.history says. I.e. harvard will kill your soul even if you refuse to sell. We know from other sources that legacy admits don't have to perform...but do the admits know that? Naturally not. They feel dazzled and humiliated by the false light, the feverish strength, of the possessed.
P.history portrays this as bamboozling The People. They're being [trapped] into going to harvard or being poor. They get knocked out of [altruism] and into [fight/flight].
That's the cult speaking. The trap is fake. The world is never genuinely that hostile. You can just turn off the TV.
What happens if you tell folk they can simply not go to harvard? Musk went to a state school. What happens is they get very angry with you. What if present a plan where you scam the broken system and live in leisure that way? They report you.
They tell me feds are in every private chat group, but why would they bother? Every voter is a nark. The glowies are redundant.
"No no you can't possibly succeed indepenently, you have to have Daddy and Mommy tell you you're a good boy!"
The Make Mommy Love Us Again, MMLUA movement. Not as photogenic, but more accurate.
Harvard is a devil-worship cult because The People want it to be a devil-worship cult. Without their enthusiastic consent, harvard could try its devil tricks all it wants, but it would wither and die.
P.history says to nationalize harvard. All you in fact have to do is cut off its subsidies and revoke its tax waivers. What if [equality under the law] lmao. Without heavy ongoing blood transfusions, harvard would choke on its own shit. That "giant" endowment would vanish in an eye blink.
In the medieval ages you could earn a peerage but it took generations, because you couldn't reasonably move up more than one rank per generation. This hasn't changed. How do you build true generational wealth today? Get a job at the IRS or get an internship at the firm which manages harvard's endowment. Your first generation will be about learning what job your second generation needs to get. Second will be about learning which "secret" societies the third generation needs to join. & so on. These things aren't secure against insider knowledge. The problem is tolerating a job at the IRS. Yeah you're going to be able to embezzle astonishing amounts of money, but the cost is having to spend your life around IRS employees.
P.S. I had forgotten how fucking dumb terry brooks' names are.
Warcry: leah. Oh leah, it's the leah.
Rimmerjob dall.
Hirehone.
Cogline, who isn't even a mechanic.
Teel, who is not green.
At least it's not lord ruler or aurivy. Lord foul is genuinely foul, but even so... Especially as his [[hero]] is similarly foul.
Ohmsford. Where's wattsford, voltsford, and ampsford? Dare I hope for impedenceford and capacitanceford?
A great team, lead by the mysterious all-anon.
5 comments:
Look, a programmer who worked for the IRS. 32:25 is interesting. Perhaps the real parasites work for Deloitte not the IRS. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4odAXoqRT8
Does deloitte manage the harvard endowment by any chance? Maybe yale or brown?
Yes, solid video. Long-form receipts, showing that irresponsibility is bad and can't be fixed.
Turns out spending someone else's money is theft, regardless of all other considerations. Crime is bad, mmkay.
Have all these processes which are supposed to prevent corruption, and all they do is incentivize corruption. "I can't legally get paid anything else, but I'm responsible for multibillion dollar contracts." So...you get paid illegally. Conveniently you work at the IRS and know who to take out for coffee to avoid getting audited.
Meanwhile, they're totally ineffective at the stated purpose. Conquest #3. Bonus: once the wrong vendor is chosen, it's almost impossible to dislodge them.
Could have a Lord in charge who at least takes soycial responsibility for the decisions. That would be unDemocratic. Also he would probably want $1 mill a year minimum, plus perks and incentives.
Can't legislate away supply and demand. Prices are what they are.
I know some of these people https://princo.princeton.edu/team/investment-team/
They are not Deloitte but they are Deloitte types
I wonder what [analyst]s do aside from buy brownie points from their parents.
We have to check whether they really manage the fund or whether they get paid to say they're managing the fund, then mindlessly take orders from some third party.
Unquestionably there's a hilarious amount of corruption here, the question is what form it takes.
Post a Comment