Independent corroboration.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/BtlWoqWLm9Q
Hebrews want you to hate them. They need you to hate them.
This is because they hate each other so much they need you to hate them more to scare them into working together. They betray each other at the drop of hat, so they need you to steal their hat.
As always the correct response to a cluster-B is no contact. Permanent and complete exile. If they have the opportunity to do something you hate, it's you who fucked up, not them.
When someone joins a cult you need to use cult tactics against them. Socially isolate them. Cast them out. Anyone who treats with a jew is a jew - and that includes treating them violently. They all go on the outside. The cluster-B seeks not love nor hate but attention, and the opposite of attention is indifference.
The world is never genuinely as hostile as the cult says it is. The flesh eating monkeys aren't real. They're hallucinating. Fighting spectres in their own minds and sodomizing each other and cutting off their own hands because the mists and shadows will win if they don't.
One way you can see that his model is incomplete is transgressing against transgression. Spoiler: think about hume cutting his finger, how emotions precede rationality.
There's a gprime comic about secretly keeping a bible in your room. Being subversively...rightoid-voting. A dissident woman being a kind mother and helpful wife, provided no strangers are watching. In public she complains she can't find a job, but never sends out a resume...
Imagine being secretly Amish. Should work perfectly, or indeed better since you're not sodomizing each other and spreading diseases. Yet we don't see this.
When someone is secretly virtuous they go with [two can keep a secret if one of them is dead]. Useless for coordination.
Being explicit: this is scientifically falsifiable. You can go look and see for yourself, rather than trying to rely on my credibility. Go ahead and try to find me someone who is virtuous in a publicly verifiable way. Someone wise, courageous, honourable, and responsible.
Another example: all these evil ruling groups are unified by a shared lie. Well, here's something that makes everyone hate you: pointing out their myths are lies. Openly believing the truth is an even greater sacrifice than willingly assenting to a lie. Should work to create cohesion, yes?
Yet we don't see this.
The core motivation is self-hatred and treachery.
The flesh-eating monkeys aren't real. They're not supposed to be real. It's all about falsely earning trust. That's why it's criminal transgression, not merely breaking the local rules. Illegitimacy is the point; of course they can't assent to truth.
Reminder: every political formula is perverse. Is the king in charge, or is the divine right of kings in charge? Go check by doing something profane. Whatever would piss god off the most. Legitimate, responsible power is useless to a power addict. It's not merely methadone, it's narcan. Instantly kills the buzz.
Put another way, if the flesh-eating monkeys are real, they're how demons perceive the rightously angry. To the baby-raping bandit, the cops are flesh-eating monkeys.
The bibble has rules against sodomy because you're supposed to break them. Because you're supposed to earn the right to break them. This is what The People want. You can tell because, when you propose rules that would prevent sodomites from being cardinals, they don't laugh and say they wouldn't work, they get very angry with you. You're ruining the game. How are you supposed to level up and betray satan, stealing his throne, if you're not allowed to practice satanism?
These groups would have been rolled by the first folk to manage to cooperate without self-mutilation, if treachery wasn't such a profound, deep need in all mortal genomes. I.e. this is Hell, what you see is a collection of Damned souls, the children of satan. Dante's circles 1-8 don't exist, there is only one true sin, and it's treachery.
Game theory inherently supposes the players want to win the game. They find the prize valuable. The game is not defined by economic incentives, even taking into account everything can be economized; everything has a price in dollars. The prices are defined by the values of the players. The game is defined by the values of the players. Aggregate demand (excuse my marxism). The players are the incentives.
"Don't hate the player who defined the game, hate the game the player defined." Every single time, it's satanism
.
In a truly harsh competitive environment, not-mutilating each other is more important, not less. It's in every-leaf-is-edible africa where they scarify and deform themselves, it's not the arctic inuit doing it. Soyvilization, especially not foot-binding china, is not competitive with sea peoples and norse raiders.
8 comments:
This is consistent with the "could you get away with your shit on a desert island" principle.
I imagine a soul on an upward trend will experience less drama and more bliss if they are doing it correctly. Like a movie in reverse.
This seems paradoxical as there should be no less engagement and action in the world. Correct me if wrong.
Why such low regard of china (the "more twisted east" etc.) ? They seem to be doing better than most "hajnal line" westerners? Or are they?
"Treachery profound need in mortal genomes" how can treachery be genetic despite unprofitable? Shouldn't genes for cooperating well win? Maybe soyciety manages to make treachery profitable, but how? Or is it solely damned soul transmigration causing the treachery, despite physical conditions?
Engagement with the false world should go down. There's very little non-false world on Earth to engage with, but if you identify this correctly, you'll see engaging with it goes up as expected.
Better at what?
They have higher social status. Mortal social status is inherently evil. Their self-destruction is more sustainable. Their traitorous black government will not soon interrupt their own mechanisms of parasitism and treachery. That's what it means to have higher social status.
They're not better at glory or virtue.
>how can treachery be genetic
Because materialism is false.
No real idea what this means. Like I get the words but I see no real comparison with reality, and yes I watched about half the video.
Jews do anti-white racism because they need whites to hate them. "Don't they see this isn't good for the jews?" Being bad for the jews is the point. They need an external enemy to unify against, because they can't unify in any other way. Whites tolerate anti-white racism, which upset the jews greatly, so they had to double down and double down again until they were properly farming antisemitism.
Jews are so oversensitive about antisemitism precisely because it's antagonizing. They want and need everyone to be their enemy, because jews are so insufferable even other jews are obsessed with destroying the jews. They have no choice but to double down. They have to make outsiders even more allergic to them than they are to themselves.
That is: netanyahu funds hamas. Most likely they attacked on october 7th on his orders. Either to justify the invasion or else because his jews were starting to jew each other. Criminals, after all, largely steal from their neighbours, because they're conveniently right there to steal from. Why go all the way across town if you don't absolutely have to?
Who gets kicked out of 109 countries (probably) and starts working on getting kicked out of a 110th? Someone who can't survive without provoking a kicking. It's not accidental, it's working as intended.
Post a Comment