Mortals vs. Logical Argument

 Arguing with a mortal is foolish at best. Do they even know what words mean? Can they do anything except what their lord or master tells them to do? You can't learn anything from them because they don't know anything, they can't learn anything from you because they're nonverbal, and even if they did learn something they would be unable to act on it.

 Some mortals might rise above, but then they're leftists. They do understand words, but they don't like them. They use fake words, because [fuck you dad]. The leftist evaluates arguments entirely based on what actions it justifies. Who cares if the argument is true, or even makes sense? They may understand some words, but words like [consistency] and [hypocrisy] are beyond them. Why go to all the effort to figure them out? It only restricts what actions they can justify.

 Did you notice how farcical this is? Nobody cares about the justifications, yet they mass-produce justifications anyway. If this isn't a colossal waste of time and effort, it's extremely well hidden. The only thing worse is trying to argue a leftist out of the fake justifications they don't care about or even care to understand.
 
 If you truly dunk on a leftist, utterly laying waste to their argument, their poolitical calculus doesn't change. They pick a new fake justification then do what they were going to do anyway.

 Before you argue with a poolitician, you first have to demand they prove they care about arguments. And you don't have to do that either, because if they cared about logic or the Truth they wouldn't be a poolitician or anywhere near poolitics.

 

 It's worse than a waste of time. When a leftoid spams their justification, they're telling you what they plan to do. If you wish to oppose them, you know where you need to stand and what tools you'll need while you're standing there.

 Argument is not one of the tools. Rhetoric only works when an authority deliberately grants favours to approved kinds of rhetoric. Nothing more than an orthodoxy shit test.

 Rightoids can't defeat leftoids only and solely because they don't want to. Normie sadomasochism. As with the leftoids, the justifications come second. Losing was the point, and if you make it difficult for them to lose, that only means they'll try harder and justify more cleverly until they lose as intended.

 

 Taxation is treason. Normies have declared war on you (and on each other). Declare war on them, or be a cuck. The peace is already suspended, the only question is whether you deliberately enslave yourself or not.

 [[[High-trust]]] is a joke. You're supposed to laugh. The light side is prey. They exist to be scammed and exploited. Being eaten is what they're for. 

Minor: Great Amusment of Moses

 I forgot the name of the habiru. Hopefully that was indeed the name I was looking for... I stumbled upon some prime comedy while I was looking it up.

 "Few people dispute that Moses was a reality in history, whether as an individual or a group of individuals, but there are several perplexing aspects of the man. First, he has an Egyptian name (as do many of his relatives). Second, he seems to spend a large amount of time among a non-Hebrew people, the Midianites, where he marries and seems to learn the Yahweh religion, and some of its cultic practices, from the Midianites." 

 From the horse's mouth: moses was neither genetically nor culturally jewish. Like he was originally named akhenaten or something, and was banished from egypt for some mysterious reason.

 Such strange suppositions. I wonder where they came from? 

 "Exodus claims that a "diverse group of peoples" left Egypt with Moses. Who were these?"

 Truly weird beliefs. I wonder if the account in exodus was deliberately distorted for poolitical reasons, but not competently enough to a) disguise the altered pixels or b) hide the real story from an invested investigator. Like it was done by the god of losers, or suchlike. 

 What an idea. 

 If, for your sins, you are familiar with the modern amarnites, tab over to la wik and ctrl-f amarna. 

The Left vs. Left-less Pendulum

 Proximately your woke videos happened because it was unthinkable to curse out a yale professor when you went.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/hk_yhi3-prw

 If university isn't supposed to be safe, then the profs can curse out the students. If the students can't cuss out the professors in return, then they will poolitically agitate to reverse that situation. "Let the low places be raised, and the hills brought down." And lo, it was so. Revolution, one pi, 180 degrees! Now students can refer to professors, to their faces, as coarsely as they like, while the profs have to walk on eggshells.

 Kto kogo. Who, whom.

 There was always a whom. The question is merely who shall have the [doing unto].

 Being explicit: if nobody can curse anyone out, or everyone can curse everyone out, like they're all adults or something outrageous like that, it's stable. You don't get this oscillating pendulum.

 Aside: I would also like to surface the idea of strangers vs. friendlies. If the students are guests of the university then they need to have guest rights and guest obligations. If they are not guests then they can't be strangers. They should live at the university, not for 4 years, but for the foreseeable future. This bizarre play-pretend hybrid is illness.

 

 Likewise, marriage was outlawed because fornication was outlawed. The way to legalize fornication was to destroy the legality of the family. Drugs get outlawed to get around the inability to prosecute drug addicts for crime.  

 

 Ultimately, fornication was outlawed in the first place precisely because such a law is unjust. Students were forbidden from cussing out their profs precisely because unearned respect is unjust. 

 The purpose of these institutions is to farm injustice. They are merely changing the colours of the injustice. Who, whom. 

 Ultimately, Karma has some words to say about this. Which is why universities are failling. Which is why !!america!! is failing.

 

 Ascended aside: p.history draws the connection between bureaucracy and anarcho-tyranny. They attack the law-abiding because criminals are scawwy but attacking either seemingly justify their fake jobs.

 Doesn't draw the connection with irresponsibility and lack of discipline, however. Bureaucracies don't go like this when they have to spend their own money.
 If the market didn't demand injustice, injustice would not be supplied. E.g. students would stop attending bureaucratized universities. I would personally start a [consumer reports]-style magazine to let students know how badly the universities were corrupting themselves, and I would make bank letting them avoid the bad ones.
 Instead, working as intended. The magazine is redundant; the students already know. They merely like the corruption. 

 In a sense, it is true: Revolution is the result of injustice. Except the point isn't to correct the injustice, it's about having a turn, pun intended. "You got to oppress last time! It's my go!"
 In a society, as opposed to a soyciety, you don't get Revolution. That's the purpose of lionizing property rights. No kto, no kogo, no Revolution. If it were legal to try Capitalism for the first time, I would do that instead of the magazine. Or rather, it would be redundant, because personnel is policy. If there were non-negligible demand for justice, it would already be legal, and Capitalism already tried. I would already be living there. 

 Anyone who desires justice doesn't need to convince the mortals to permit it. They only need to convince Karma that they truly desire justice. Rather than doing dumb things like blogging, you should exploit the mortals. They like being exploited anyway. Trade tips on how to hack their intentionally broken systems for your own personal enrichment; either without being caught or without the mortals noticing anything wrong at all.

Minor: Scion's Shadowen

 I mistakenly attributed it to wishsong. The names are still atrocious, but anyway it's the dreams in scion of shannara.

 

Humans wandered the ashen devastation in packs, more animals than men. They rent and tore at each other; they howled and shrieked. Dark shapes flitted among them, shadows that lacked substance yet had eyes of fire. The shadows moved through the humans, joining with them, becoming them, leaving them again. They moved in a dance that was macabre, yet purposeful. The shadows were devouring the humans, he saw. The shadows were feeding on them.

The vision shifted. He saw himself then, a skeletal, ragged beggar facing a cauldron of strange white fire that bubbled and swirled and whispered his name. Vapors lifted from the cauldron and snaked their way down to where he stood, wrapping about him, caressing him as if he were their child. Shadows flitted all about, passing by at first, then entering him as if he were a hollow casing in which they might play as they chose. He could feel their touch; he wanted to scream.



And abruptly Par found himself recalling the dreams that Allanon had sent, the visions of a nightmarish world in which everything was blackened and withered and life was reduced to something barely recognizable. Reddened eyes blinked like bits of fire, and shadow forms flitted through a haze of ash and smoke.

 

 (Par ultimately found his bosom companions; eagle, birdie, hole-in-one, poached, and stir-fry. The cooking is bad though; his brother is named colic, or coll for short. Don't worry, the two passages above are by far the best part of the whole series.) 

Examples of Definition Success

 Bro did some set 0s.

https://theanti-puritan.blogspot.com/2025/10/no-magical-third-categories.html

 It's not how I would define [concentration camp], but the definitions are perfectly valid. He illustrates how the handles fit together neatly with no gaps. He successfully implies that trying to put new handles crosswise would only stop you from grasping the existing handles. 

 Using this system, I would say hitler didn't run any concentration camps, only prisons. As far as I know, likewise the gulags and FDR's japanese camps were prisons. The gulags would kill you sometimes, but mainly when stalin had it out for you personally. Individual special cases.

Gender War as Cope

 So-called men are subconsciously aware they're not good enough for marriage.
The whores who demand to be called women are aware they're not marriageable.

 However, if the whores can blame the gay boys, and the gay boys can blame the whores, they can distract themselves from their painful self-awareness. "There's no good men." Thus no reason for me to stop being bad, she doesn't say.
 Commoners always cast blame for the purpose of justifying the inaction they were doomed to anyway.
The universal commoner cope is the claim they're not commoners, incapable of action.

 At an intermediate level we can blame the government. The whores and boys are doing what they're told. "But I wanted to be a whore like I was  told, and be marriageable!" Sure, and I want to find a dozen fully armed, staffed, and loyal nuclear ICBM silos in my back yard, but that's not how that works.

 However, this reflects back on the voters. You can in fact simply disengage from the government. "You want me to be a what now? Ah, you're my enemy, I see." Instead, this is consensual non-con. Demand for oppression, demand for tyranny. When the boys and their whores complain about the [dating market] the insult is backhanded. They're letting the government know the oppression is working and they should keep doing it. They can't openly approve because it's supposed to be non-con. Would break the roleplay.       

 The important part is to make sure it really is hurting them, and not some kind of masochistic pleasure. It's important that they pay off their  karma so they can go properly extinct, lightly for their sake and mainly for your own. If it's not hurting them, it's time for non-consensual non-con. Tyrannize them openly.

 

 My belief: during the low tech times, many souls arrived on Earth with karma so bad they couldn't live past infancy. Couldn't pay off any of  their debt. Technology had to be forcibly raised so that it could prop up their weak existence, that they might live long enough to suffer.

 A big backlog developed. Unjustly low depravity had to be balanced by today's concentrated depravity.

 However, it turns out they didn't need to live long. Perhaps they suffered so tremendously during their brief tenure that it didn't take much. Now more souls are being forgiven for existing than are Falling to Earth. As such, birth rates have to come down, and given that, something has to justify the lack of births. 

 One of those things is lack of sex. Not coincidentally, these mutant souls which can't survive childhood also can't find a mate. Mortals adjust their standards based on their own position, but there is a floor. The standards can only be adjusted so low.

 That is: birth rates below 0.75 would be a good thing, that is, unless you want to maximize suffering, despair, and failure. Not forgetting that caring at all about how a bunch of strangers feel is a serious mental illness.

 Alternatively there was a war in heaven, which means lots of dead immortals, which means lots of bonus mortal souls. It would require more epicycles but it's not impossible.

Soyciety Neither Deserves Nor Wants Saving

  Western culture doesn't stop at trying to make you a narcissist, nor merely aiding and abetting narcissistic violations, it is itself a narcissist. Grandiose, I think.

 Western culture tries to gaslight you about western culture. That's what virtue-signalling is. It tries to secure narcissistic supply, in the form of letting its agents make you bow to its delusions.

 Western culture isn't mistaken or even truly deluded. It isn't a little oopsie, and it isn't hallucinating. It is lying, and getting you to assent to the lie is point. They say Soviet Communists made you assent to a lie to humiliate you, but the west makes you assent to a lie to make you assent to a lie. That's the end goal. The purpose of Western cuture is to mendaciously prevaricate.

 Ultimately all narcissists hate themselves. That's your ethno-masochism. It has to come out somehow. Western culture cuts itself.

 It goes further, it says you can help it cut itself, taking revenge for all the abuse, provided you also cut yourself.

 Satan giving you permission to punch him in the face provided you wear a brass knuckle with inward-facing spikes. That's how a deal with the devil works. "If I can stab your back, you can stab mine." Can't you hear it? When you "scratch" someone's back, it doesn't sound like you're being kind. Cue midwit meme.

 You don't argue with a narcissist. You can't wake up someone pretending to be asleep. Narcissists never agree to treatment, so you never treat a narcissist either. The way to deal with a narcissist is indefinite involuntary hospitalization.
 
 If doing so is currently illegal, then the only solution is [no contact].

 Don't watch the TV, don't watch movies, don't play story-heavy games, don't vote, don't read the newspaper. Sure as fuck don't send your kids to its narcissist schools.
 You have to say the big No. Find a way not to pay taxes.

 Attempting to [save] a narcissist is what they want. Since they're the ones sabotaging themselves, they can play out the game indefinitely. Every time you [save] them from some vice, they create a new one. Gets more attention. The time and effort you spend on western culture distracts it from the overwhelming shame and worthlessness it quite rightly feels. You don't [resist] a narcissist, their power is fake. By resisting you're merely assenting to their delusional frame.

 "But other cultures are even worse." Yes, and isn't that something. That other cultures are worse does not make insanity any healthier.

 Any form of engagement with the narcissist culture is to deny that it is narcissist. It will wrap you into its dynamic. Only in rare cases will it not turn you into a narcissist yourself. The solution is [no contact].

Divinity Ballparking

 You cannot honestly suggest the bibble was written by a god if you have the most vague, remote ideas of what a god is really like.
 It comes from a place of absurd hubris, atheism, or fuckin' lying.

 If a god wrote a book would we be able to understand it? I mean, no, obviously not? Even if they dumbed it way way way down it wouldn't look remotely human. Scholars would not argue if this passage contradicts that one, they would argue what the fuck it's doing in the book at all. "Does...does this follow? Can you even tell if it's true or not?" (It does, you can, it is.)

 A god would make homer look like a child throwing a tantrum while he happened to have paint on his fingers. It makes a picture, you know, sort of. Fingers and paint were involved.

 In the elder scrolls, the eponymous scrolls are left lying around the mortal world, because it's not like mortals can read them. If you stare at one for too long your head blows up. A higher god trying to write for us wouldn't be saying, "Be not afraid," he would be trying to convince the shattered dust that used to be a planet to get its act back together for another tour.

 By higher I mean upper low. A genuine higher god doesn't worry about us looking at him, he worries about him looking at us, since if he moves from glance to stare, everything explodes. Supernovas for everyone. Imagine attention so weighty it causes physical nuclear fusion. Hooray, you discovered element 1000. First synthesis for humanity. It used to be your colon. Your spine became a nucleus of element 496, for reference.
 Luckily they have no reason to care about us in the slightest, any more than you care about specific electrons in a bacteria's cell wall.

 I suppose this has been a rep of set four. Done so many I launch them by accident. Seeped into my bones.
Why do gods seem to have such a vague idea of mortal concerns? Because properly looking at us...would be very painful. For us.

Welkin Tales: Satan's Plan

 Satan had an eternal life project. If you have infinite negative karma, you would suffer forever - that is, you will never die. Unlimited reincarnation. Adamantizing the chains of samsara.

 Thus, Satan taught everyone to profane themselves. To seek the bad and avoid the good. Despite his many failings, Satan was no mortal. He taught and mortals listened. The plan is technically workable. Great strides were made.
 
 I believe Satan had intricate fanfiction for every individual. You can feel his plan for you, which is handy for breaking it. Perhaps in the past it wasn't always bad to [be a part of something larger] but, now, Satan has booby trapped all the exits. All soycial or even historical structures serve dead Satan's design in some way or another.
 E.g. this blog is already too popular. E.g. I should stop tweeting, but, well, Satan was not a mortal. At least my true follower count is essentially 0, which is the correct number.

 Earth has latent potential for tremendous, incomprehensible beauty, but Mortals gonna Mort, and even if you could stop them you shouldn't.

 He probably chose eternal life because the Egyptians were doing it. Unlike most soycieties Egypt had a purpose beyond collecting taxes and blowing them on hookers and fentanyl. They, too, had an eternal life project. There was some disagreement about how eternal life ought to be sought, such as through ascension or through eternal youth, but nevertheless everything in Egyptian soyciety was bent toward this purpose. Or, at least, known to be a distraction and tolerated out of an acceptance of imperfection.

 Being such a long-lived soyciety, opinions varied, but sometimes mummification was ye olde cryogenics.

 A digression: in Egypt, the soul was ka. Body was khet, and was considered a sub-part of the soul. Fundamental sounds for fundamental ideas.  

 Preserving the body that, when immortality was achieved, the soul could be reinstated. (Err, the ba, personality, could be reinstated.) At other times, preserving the soul using the body, the khet, as a vessel, preventing Death in the sense of losing touch with what we call material Reality, and entering the underworld. Anchoring the ka, that the soul might be rejuvenated once rejuvenation was understood.

 Few know that Egypt succeeded. The project was, unlike Satan, not a total failure. They learned. Too late, they learned immortality is a mistake.
 
 Satan did not learn.

 Or he already knew, and chose eternal life because it is a mistake.

On Things Which Aren't Meritocracy

 Highly accurate, though you still need more background to avoid getting deceived.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/JU_8fJjtGxA
 Calling it meritocracy is disingenuous. [Dissociation] is demonic possession. They specifically select for psyches so destroyed they match the blank slate hypothesis. Nobody's home. Power addicts lust for the easily controlled.

 The reason [dissociated] psyches change so easily is that one possessing spirit gets evicted by another. Devil infighting. They're genuinely, literally, scientifically, a different person. The obama sworn in for 2008 did not bodily survive to 2016. Not the same guy.

 Terry brooks, in wishsong, comes up with shadowen. https://shannara.fandom.com/wiki/Shadowen Except he claims they lost. Didn't. Also, claims they're fantasy.  

 Meritocracy is fameocracy. The [[merit]] is [[shows up in newspapers]]. The term [success] measured entirely by how many can recognize you.

 

 At one point he says only ~1% of harvard admits are [[[meritocratic]]], meaning 99% are filler or entrenched interests keeping themselves entrenched. I.e. business as usual for all of known history. Is meritocracy lindy, or is harvard not meritocratic?
 Can you name any of these legacy silver-spoon admits? The 1% act as cover for the 99%. Fame as a disease, which harvard inoculates most graduates against.

 He says rich folk aren't necessarily smart, but that is in fact untrue. If you can remain rich, you're smart. A fool and his money. Thus; harvard is clever. It portrays itself as a fame whore, exactly the opposite of what it is.

 Super clever. The camouflage is only one primary function. The other is, by portraying itself as the school of the famous, it creates a traumatizing culture, as p.history says. I.e. harvard will kill your soul even if you refuse to sell. We know from other sources that legacy admits don't have to perform...but do the admits know that? Naturally not. They feel dazzled and humiliated by the false light, the feverish strength, of the possessed.

 P.history portrays this as bamboozling The People. They're being [trapped] into going to harvard or being poor. They get knocked out of [altruism] and into [fight/flight].

 That's the cult speaking. The trap is fake. The world is never genuinely that hostile. You can just turn off the TV.

 What happens if you tell folk they can simply not go to harvard? Musk went to a state school. What happens is they get very angry with you. What if present a plan where you scam the broken system and live in leisure that way? They report you.
They tell me feds are in every private chat group, but why would they bother? Every voter is a nark. The glowies are redundant.

 "No no you can't possibly succeed indepenently, you have to have Daddy and Mommy tell you you're a good boy!"
 The Make Mommy Love Us Again, MMLUA movement. Not as photogenic, but more accurate.

 Harvard is a devil-worship cult because The People want it to be a devil-worship cult. Without their enthusiastic consent, harvard could try its devil tricks all it wants, but it would wither and die.

 P.history says to nationalize harvard. All you in fact have to do is cut off its subsidies and revoke its tax waivers. What if [equality under the law] lmao. Without heavy ongoing blood transfusions, harvard would choke on its own shit. That "giant" endowment would vanish in an eye blink.

 In the medieval ages you could earn a peerage but it took generations, because you couldn't reasonably move up more than one rank per generation. This hasn't changed. How do you build true generational wealth today? Get a job at the IRS or get an internship at the firm which manages harvard's endowment. Your first generation will be about learning what job your second generation needs to get. Second will be about learning which "secret" societies the third generation needs to join. & so on.  These things aren't secure against insider knowledge. The problem is tolerating a job at the IRS. Yeah you're going to be able to embezzle astonishing amounts of money, but the cost is having to spend your life around IRS employees.

 P.S. I had forgotten how fucking dumb terry brooks' names are.
Warcry: leah. Oh leah, it's the leah.
Rimmerjob dall.
Hirehone.
Cogline, who isn't even a mechanic.
Teel, who is not green.

 At least it's not lord ruler or aurivy. Lord foul is genuinely foul, but even so... Especially as his [[hero]] is similarly foul.

 Ohmsford. Where's wattsford, voltsford, and ampsford? Dare I hope for impedenceford and capacitanceford?
A great team, lead by the mysterious all-anon.

Missing: Transgressing Against Transgressive Norms

 Independent corroboration.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/BtlWoqWLm9Q
 Hebrews want you to hate them. They need you to hate them.
This is because they hate each other so much they need you to hate them more to scare them into working together. They betray each other at the drop of hat, so they need you to steal their hat.

 As always the correct response to a cluster-B is no contact. Permanent and complete exile. If they have the opportunity to do something you hate, it's you who fucked up, not them.

 When someone joins a cult you need to use cult tactics against them. Socially isolate them. Cast them out. Anyone who treats with a jew is a jew - and that includes treating them violently. They all go on the outside. The cluster-B seeks not love nor hate but attention, and the opposite of attention is indifference.

 

 The world is never genuinely as hostile as the cult says it is. The flesh eating monkeys aren't real. They're hallucinating. Fighting spectres in their own minds and sodomizing each other and cutting off their own hands because the mists and shadows will win if they don't.



 One way you can see that his model is incomplete is transgressing against transgression. Spoiler: think about hume cutting his finger, how emotions precede rationality.

 There's a gprime comic about secretly keeping a bible in your room. Being subversively...rightoid-voting. A dissident woman being a kind mother and helpful wife, provided no strangers are watching. In public she complains she can't find a job, but never sends out a resume...

 Imagine being secretly Amish. Should work perfectly, or indeed better since you're not sodomizing each other and spreading diseases. Yet we don't see this.
When someone is secretly virtuous they go with [two can keep a secret if one of them is dead]. Useless for coordination.

 Being explicit: this is scientifically falsifiable. You can go look and see for yourself, rather than trying to rely on my credibility. Go ahead and try to find me someone who is virtuous in a publicly verifiable way. Someone wise, courageous, honourable, and responsible.

 Another example: all these evil ruling groups are unified by a shared lie. Well, here's something that makes everyone hate you: pointing out their myths are lies. Openly believing the truth is an even greater sacrifice than willingly assenting to a lie. Should work to create cohesion, yes?
Yet we don't see this.

 The core motivation is self-hatred and treachery.

 The flesh-eating monkeys aren't real. They're not supposed to be real. It's all about falsely earning trust. That's why it's criminal transgression, not merely breaking the local rules. Illegitimacy is the point; of course they can't assent to truth.

 Reminder: every political formula is perverse. Is the king in charge, or is the divine right of kings in charge? Go check by doing something profane. Whatever would piss god off the most. Legitimate, responsible power is useless to a power addict. It's not merely methadone, it's narcan. Instantly kills the buzz.

 Put another way, if the flesh-eating monkeys are real, they're how demons perceive the rightously angry. To the baby-raping bandit, the cops are flesh-eating monkeys.

 The bibble has rules against sodomy because you're supposed to break them. Because you're supposed to earn the right to break them. This is what The People want. You can tell because, when you propose rules that would prevent sodomites from being cardinals, they don't laugh and say they wouldn't work, they get very angry with you. You're ruining the game. How are you supposed to level up and betray satan, stealing his throne, if you're not allowed to practice satanism?

 These groups would have been rolled by the first folk to manage to cooperate without self-mutilation, if treachery wasn't such a profound, deep need in all mortal genomes. I.e. this is Hell, what you see is a collection of Damned souls, the children of satan. Dante's circles 1-8 don't exist, there is only one true sin, and it's treachery.

 Game theory inherently supposes the players want to win the game. They find the prize valuable. The game is not defined by economic incentives, even taking into account everything can be economized; everything has a price in dollars. The prices are defined by the values of the players. The game is defined by the values of the players. Aggregate demand (excuse my marxism). The players are the incentives. 

 "Don't hate the player who defined the game, hate the game the player defined." Every single time, it's satanism

.

 In a truly harsh competitive environment, not-mutilating each other is more important, not less. It's in every-leaf-is-edible africa where they scarify and deform themselves, it's not the arctic inuit doing it. Soyvilization, especially not foot-binding china, is not competitive with sea peoples and norse raiders.