Thursday, May 4, 2023

PSA: Musk is a Wordcel

Elon Musk is not a shape rotator. 

Elon is baffled by the 3D world because it doesn't fit neatly into his linear 1D mind. He copes by pretending he finds the mystery wondrous. The only reason he doesn't look entirely retarded is that his V-IQ does happen to be high, so the 1D lines can sort of simulate complexity by getting very long.

P.S. The actual IQ you want is not S-IQ nor V-IQ, but L-IQ. They almost never talk about it, for the usual Envy reasons. It doesn't matter how fast you can do sums if you can't understand what they mean.

Millennia-Scale Inflation is About Negative 0.09%

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Wheat-Prices-1300-1600-in-Tuscany-soldi-per-staio-and-England-pence-per-125-bushels_fig1_253633731
From 1300-1600, approximately from the earliest reliable records to the age of the Bank of England and fractional reserve, the price of a bushel of wheat was 10p. That's 0.84 shillings, or 4.7 grams of silver. We can consider that the non-buggered price.

There was also a multicentury period of very stable wheat prices in Rome.
http://web.mit.edu/14.731/www/jep05.pdf

“[Rickman] said that the price of wheat was between three and four sesterces per modius around 150 BCE“

4 sesterces = 1 denarius, denarius = 0.84 shillings worth of silver. 

A modius is about 1/4 of a bushel though, so wheat in Rome was about four times the price of wheat in England. 

The price did go up in the next few centuries, and that's reflected in the above link, but only because they were debasing the denarius. (Even then the debasement was sub-1% per year on average, though of course Rome debased in job lots rather than every day. If you run the numbers you'll find it's pretty much the same weight of silver per bushel.) You can check because they later debased like crazy and prices went crazy as expected.

If you do 400% deflation over 1600 years you get that the price of silver denominated in wheat grew by 0.09% per year. Over a normal 70-year lifespan prices would go down by about 6%. Obviously these are rough figures, but the data isn't all that accurate in the first place.

About 1/3 of the grain shipped from Egypt, so a lot of that was shipping costs.

 

In conclusion long-run prices are indeed very stable. Stuff is worth what it's worth. But not exactly stable: economic growth does indeed lead to deflation. Gregory Clark made a chart of long-run economic growth and published it in Farewell to Alms, which you can refer to if you want to check my ballpark estimate against someone who isn't entirely lazy. I'm confident it will be thematically accurate. 

 

Speaking of, let's do Egypt. http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/prices.htm

1 sack of wheat (c.58 kg) 1600BC to 1100BC, very roughly:
1 to 2 deben
1 senyu = 7.6 grams silver = 5 deben

58 kg => 2/5 7.6 silver = 3.04 grams.
1 bushel wheat = 27 kg, so 1.42 grams silver.

Way cheaper than England. About 1/3. However, we can see this isn't a good apples-to-apples comparison because the Nile Valley is absurdly fertile, which results in very high supply and thus very low prices. That's why the Romans conquered it for cheap grain. In other words we expect Egyptian grain prices to be very low, but we have no measure of how low, exactly, so we can't factor it out. Given ancient shipping was often oar-powered, obviously Egyptian prices had to be less than half Roman prices, but at the same time we can see Roman prices are fairly representative of Mediterranean/European prices in general.

 

Fun fact at very small numbers percentages work like adding. 0.09% growth * 0.09% growth ~= 0.09% + 0.09%. As a result if you want the prices of wheat in silver it went down by 0.09% per year, 99.91% as high. Although if you multiply that through all 1600 it goes to 25% as per the correct ratio.
Given the large exponent if you want anything that's really accurate you would need many many more significant figures, and given the price reports have uncertainties of at least ±33%, good  luck with that. 

Next fun fact: seems every European and even North African society had a denarius/drachma/shilling/senyu of about the same size hence performing the same social function. Until someone diluted the silver in it or otherwise assbushed the economy.

 

P.S. With great futility, I dream of a world where I don't have to do all my error-handling in-house.

I can't help imagining a world where I face rebuttals when I'm wrong, instead of when I'm not wrong.
I suppose it comes with the territory if you decide to be a sacred cow butcher. You only get a response if the cleaver hits a real sacred cow.

Wednesday, May 3, 2023

Quick Reminder: A Reserve Currency Serves no Purpose

Before computers it was somewhat more convenient, albeit not worth the price. Now, after computers, a reserve currency is wildly superfluous. The only reason to accept a reserve currency is to donate money to another country's central bank. "I love inflation and can't get enough." 

Simply have the computer convert all prices to the local currency and include the conversion costs without telling you, since you don't need to know. Maybe get a programmer to make it handle tariffs and such as well. 

The only reason USD survived as 'reserve' is because everyone knew they would go all Ukraine on you if you were the first to stop clapping. Now they've a) blown their wad and b) shown that the threat was in fact impotent.

Envy Fundamentalists More Effective When Using Envy

The abstract uses the phrase 'greed communication' because, of course, they are also Envy fundamentalists and have avoid calling a spade a spade. 

"Analyzing every tweet of all US senators holding office from 2013 to 2021 (861,104 tweets from 140 senators), we identify a psycholinguistic factor, greed communication [TC: basically accusing other people of greed], that robustly predicts increased approval (favorites) and reach (retweets). These effects persist when tested against diverse established psycholinguistic predictors of political content dissemination on social media and various other psycholinguistic variables."

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2218680120
https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2023/03/which-political-tweets-do-best.html
https://nitter.unixfox.eu/Outsideness/status/1634954719952277506


All-in Envy fundamentalists beat out reticent Envy fundamentalists when deploying Envy.

"We further find that greed communication in the tweets of Democratic senators is associated with greater approval and retweeting compared to greed communication in the tweets of Republican senators, especially when those tweets also mention political outgroups."

If you want to succeed on Twitter, remember to irresponsible and never mind your own business. 

After all, what kind of population would your own business concern? Reach more by sticking your nose in their business.

Tuesday, May 2, 2023

I found the dumb: how you get deflation

So I figured out that deflation doesn't happen when you get more goods, which is wrong, which mean I was dumb. I must have dropped a factor somewhere. Figured out where.

I saw that there were more transactions and figured more transactions = more velocity. Bzzt. Not if the transactions are smaller. "Plus means plus," I thought, neglecting that these are scalars, not booleans.

Imagine a very simple economy. There two guys and ten bucks. One guy makes one thing, and sells it for ten bucks to the other guy. The other guy makes one thing, and sell it to get his ten bucks back. Total demand = 20, total supply = 20. Velocity = 1/1. 

Now imagine ONE HUNDRED PERCENT GPD GROWTH. My god, they're making two things each!

Right, but the guy still has only ten bucks. He can't bid ten. He can only bid five. He makes two transaction, of five dollars each. And vice versa. Total demand = 20, total supply = 20. Velocity =1/1. Having twice as much stuff means per-stuff prices are half as high. 

Although you can also use velocity to mitigate deflation. My previous logic isn't completely invalid, merely incomplete. Increasing supply can show up in lower prices or increasing velocity. On average, it will be both. 

Velocity itself is an expense. Transactions have transaction costs. Better one big transaction made of many small prices than several transactions made of big prices. To get total demand/supply up to 40, we have to implicitly assume our two guys have a second free day to make into market day. And after we've increased velocity, they don't have that day anymore. It would be more efficient to bundle the transactions and go back to one market day a year. Which means prices go down. 

 

P.S. The market itself isn't free. The market commands a rent, out of friction if no other reason. Communication isn't magic. Talking takes time. 

You don't want unrestricted transaction options either. You want a transaction securer, or rather a whole industry of such, which secures individual transactions. You're allowed to make unsecured transactions, but you'll find they're insecure.

Retraction: Incorrect Statement of Inflation

I autism'd the math on millennial inflation. 

I incorrectly asserted the following: "Any time production should cause deflation, it also increases velocity, cancelling the deflation with inflation, and wheat prices remain the same."

When I re-ran the numbers, they did not bear this out. Reality contradicted my theory. I did not think in straight lines. One of my trains jumped a track. Oops.

Monday, May 1, 2023

The "I'm Totally More Devious Than Satan" Christian

"Why would Satan dictate to anyone a comprehensive list of strategies of how to beat him, an overview of his Machiavellian plans, and constant thorough praises to his sworn enemy Jesus Christ?"

https://nitter.unixfox.eu/Vibologer/status/1583884414571847680  

 

Hey, who told you his sworn enemy was Jesus?
Who told you the devils were cast out?
Was it the father of lies who said he was his sworn enemy?

Are you a dumb, gullible little shit, or are you a good Satanist?


"The truth will set you free.
This book is the word of God unadulterated by man!"

So if the book is empirically shown to be adulterated, you are confessing your Satanism?
I'm sure Satan would have been pleased if he weren't dead.

Nick Land Confesses to Catholic Cuckery

Earth is an uninhabited planet. There is no intelligent life. That is not a joke. 

"Only missing part is a frontier. Shouldn't be impossible to open one (or several)."
https://twitter.com/Outsideness/status/1653083045862285312

There only isn't a frontier if you bow to the authority of grass monkeys. 

You can and should consider outsiders to be lower animals. Dangerous aboriginal wildlife, like bears or tigers. A hazard, like malaria or hookworm. 

Open a frontier? 

Earth is uninhabited. Be the first to live there.
There is nowhere that isn't a frontier.