Monday, September 22, 2025

Historical Roots of Wokecostals

 Some are tempted to say wokism is a christian heresy. They are in fact editing the bibble. They notice you can't say both X and Y at the same time, and they take the rational path of keeping that which has more or stronger bibblical support and deciding the rest doesn't fit. E.g. there's a few weak passages against lying, they throw all those out with prejudice.

 I would call it christianity but less wrong. It strikes me as a purer version of the intended message. They use it because it strikes them the same way.

 However, this suggests the christianity drives their beliefs. That's a journalism. SJWs are SJWs because that's what they're biologically like. They used modified christianity because modified christianity supports what they were going to do anyway.
 
 Which is to say the original authors of those sections were biological SJWs. "Trust a snake before a jew, trust a jew before a greek." The founding mothers wanted to recreate a classical polity, and they truly succeeded, including adopting the average greek's extraordinary fondness for prevarication. Diogenes and the other good philosophers were in radical opposition to the startlingly dishonest hellene culture. "Man is a poolitical animal," is more of a moral injunction. "Make yourself a poo golem, plz and tks."

 Thus in america poo golem phenotypes are not selected against. Instead virtue is selected against. Hence the proliferation of sewage voters.

 The check is that julius kaisar was an SJW. Literally antifa, except not a coward and not a moron. The strongest degenerate gooning sodomite to ever live. Do you know why he [crossed the rubicon]? Because there were cops waiting on the other side to jail him due to breaking the law all the goddamn time, and his immunity had just expired. Terrorist. Billy ayers et al. A serious [what is the penalty for being late] moment, but he was in the wrong more than the poolicy.
 Kaiser is why immunities aren't done anymore. They can't keep short-term thinkers out of office. If you asked kaisar what he would have felt like if he hadn't had breakfast this morning, he would have told you he did have breakfast this morning.
 
 The bibble didn't cause wokeness. Fundamentally criminal phenotypes, kaisar's fellow tribesmen, wrote the bibble. The parts of the bibble the wokies like were written by their ancient compatriots.

 Most of what they're throwing out was also poolitical. The ancients pwned their rivals by being slightly less debased in those cases. Praise be to, uh, someone, those parts are no longer poolitically useful and can be discarded. !!Progress!!

 For completeness I will mention parts of the bibble that aren't intentionally bad, like [don't steal], which are good because they essentially predate the hebrews. When the oral culture was corrupted, for poolitical reasons parts of the old basically righteous structure were preserved. Not want Satan wanted, but Satan was not all-powerful and couldn't have everything he wanted.
 Not coincidentally yeshua's ghostwriters tried to say all those parts had been superseded. Mohammed too. It didn't quite work, so this time around the wokies say christianity per se has been superseded.

 This works because christian values are ingrained into the culture after 900 years of incessant Satanist engraving. Sheer inertia is more than enough to replace ye ansient "holy" book.
 E.g. the online troll usually doesn't bear false witness against his neighbour. He bears false witness against himself - the bibble doesn't say anything about that! E.g. Concern trolling is nothing but weaponized christian !!charity!!.

 I wonder if the !!constitution!! was supposed to replace the bibble, or if that was merely a lucky opportunity. They still have old written support, see? Woke is Trad, you just don't get it. All Men (including woMen) are created equal. Old dead guys said so and weren't instantly smitten by Zeus' bolts, it must be true.
 
 On the contary that lincoln fucker fought a whole war to prove men are !!equal!!, and he won, see, that means ares approved. That makes it christian, right? It had nothing to do with having a 0% chance of letting all those taxpayers off the plantation. Especially had nothing to do with the fact slaves don't pay taxes, but sharecroppers do. All hail the IRS. Stand and salute the tax man.

 Which is say the following isn't bad, as long as you keep in mind that christians are batshit zealots. Fundamentalist nutters, who [[[struggle]]] with cognitive dissonance instead of, you know, fixing it. https://www.thepsmiths.com/p/joint-review-origens-revenge-by-brian

"Does saying that make me a lib?"
Yes. Yes it does. Cue midwit meme.

8 comments:

333owl said...

Off-topic

Is a soyvilization created by lords in the first place?

worlddestroyar said...

Check out https://alrenous.blogspot.com/2024/10/perhaps-state-formation-should-be.html

rezzealaux said...

>Woke is Trad, you just don't get it. All Men (including woMen) are
Woke Men
WoMen
women

Alrenous said...

What is known: soyvilization decays when the current caste of lords kills itself or goes galt.
Conceivably but not provably, all hunters were lords. The farming ratio works out; (reasonably) healthy soycieties have a lord:serf ratio of 1:100, that is, all the excess population created by farming are runts who would have died in the wild, leading to runt lineages.

Here's my first guess: lordly hunters boink the migrating african holes, leading to degenerate offspring. Bastards. Psychopathic lords. These twisted psychos come up with slavery and farming. The remaining healthy lords aren't smart enough to genocide the psycho lords, because they like raiding the farmers. They see genocide as killing the golden goose.

That is; ranching happened when a farming soyciety killed itself and the remaining lordly lords went for an animal substitute.

Due to population ratios, the farmers only have to catch the hunters off-guard once, whereas the hunters have to win against the farmers every time.

Krakowiak said...

A thought:not only is the additional population created by farming of lower genetic quality, but also the lords might degenerate genetically; specifically if their children all survive and no downward social mobility occurs, such as if the lord had only two children because he knew they would all survive, and thus both stay in the lordly class, than harmful mutations will accumulate in the lordly class just the same as among the peasants or any other living creatures, and not get removed from the lords gene pool, thus making the noble classes decline in genetic quality as soon as they can live safely and with sufficient abundance to lower their infant mortality, off having serfs.

Krakowiak said...

The genetic decline applies to everyone with lowered infant mortality, especially if the number of children is low, such as with nobles in long-time agricultural societies.

Alrenous said...

Long-time farmers specifically hit stable populations and start to partially recover, as downward mobility is guaranteed. Famine is good for you. Sadly the environment of treachery twists the race that submits to farming. The more-orderly east is twisted worse, while the chaos in the west loosened the grip of the demented soyciety.

Krakowiak said...

The noble decline I wrote about is caused by their low fertility, not population growth, the way it is with the lower strata.Because a noble with just three children is lucky to have one not worse than himself, since he didn't roll the dice enough times to overcome the odds, while peasants with six babies might see the recovery you wrote of. Making farming even worse for humans then you think it is, since nobles do tend to have lesser birth rate. What could be the reason why tribe chief had 10 kids but the count has 2-3?