Monday, December 2, 2024

Cowardice vs. Free Speech

 Women will always bow to pressure. Infinite cowardice.

 Which raises the question: who pressures? Does the virtuous man run extortion rackets, or is it the defective parasite? To ask is to answer.

 What is free speech? It is to permit literal devils to pressure women without limit. It is an astonishingly stupid idea.
 As previously, under Democracy, men are also women. Peasants are cowards.

3 comments:

333owl said...

I'm not sure I understand cowardice as a concept. I really want to do something -> I do it. If the cost is way higher than I previously realized, I don't want it anymore. Simple.

Peasants want to submit -> they submit. (Why do you want to submit though? You must be defective in the first place.) Hm...

Peasants say they want one thing("freedom"), but then they actually demand another (oppresion). Perhaps cowardice is simply being a liar, i.e. being anti-consciousness? It's clear that they don't take what they say seriously. It converges somewhere in the consciousness/zombie question...


Alrenous said...

Cowardice, then, is wanting to be afraid.

Cowardice privileges short-term incentives over long-term incentives. If you fight bravely, you probably win. If you run away, you don't lose, but you've run away.

Cowards will avoid a tiny risk of a large loss by taking a guaranteed risk of a small loss.

Cowards see risks socially rather than mathematically. If something socially codes as risky they don't do it.

Alrenous said...

When the coward sees a big downside, they become obsessed with it. They can't see any upsides, and they can't see any downsides attributed to avoiding their obsession. Result, they refuse to take good, profitable bets, and instead take repeated losses.

A coward is also a social coward. They're afraid of being seen as wrong. This prevents them from being wise. It's hard enough for a honourable men. Cowardice makes you weak in battle, weak in commerce, and weak in debate too.
This means even if they could take good bets they wouldn't be able to identify which is which. Technically it's rational for them to avoid all risk, since they would will get scammed and often take pointless lethal risks.