In Shocking News, Whores are not Mothers

 https://twitter.com/VDAREJamesK/status/1846667644155400215/

 The potential mothers who would hate their own children are removing themselves from the gene pool.

 This is, apparently, [bleak]. 

 The heavens: "SUFFER LESS"

 These guys: "NO!!! FUCK YOU FUCK YOUUUUU!!!!!111!!!"

 Goddamn mortals. Every time.
 Someone shoving divine mercy down their throats, and they're coughing and gagging themselves and doing everything they can to spite it.

 Check the early life section. To see if they were born, as opposed to spontaneously appearing. Mortals gonna mort. 

  "Let's remove the worst traitors from existence without a war, plague, famine, or mass executions."
 "NO!!!1 HAVE KIDS HAVE KIDS RIGHT NOW DON'T THINK"  

 ...well, okay then, I suppose. We can do it the other way too. 

 

 Thread doesn't even describe events correctly. The culture has decided that sex is for pleasure, rather than for children. Not coincidentally, women become uglier when they a) are pregnant or b) give birth. Nulliparous women are higher-quality sex (for pleasure) objects, nulligravidous maidens even more so.

 Females are merely obediently being prostitutes. Doing as they're told. Insofar as any women are having children, it is by mistake or via pure subversive rebellion.

 Kirk here just wants prostitutes to have kids. Being a whore is fine, but being a sterile whore isn't cool, apparently. "Kindly reduce your own value [[[for society]]], plz and tks." Let's see how this works out for him.

 P.S. Fun fact, chaste women are significantly less healthy, sometimes lethally so, than mothers. The risk of dying in childbirth is overwhelmed by the marginally increased risk to everything else. Especially less healthy than mothers who first gave birth early in life. Though perhaps spinsters are spinsters because they are unhealthy, rather than unhealthy because they are spinsters. 

Most Social Moves Placebo

 Autists don't notice many social manoeuvres.
 This results in realizing that they only work if you notice them. Someone tells the autist about some terrible social move they were oblivious to, then the autist works out the effect it was supposed to have, and it turns out it didn't replicate.

 For example, in most cases, bystanders don't notice insults. Too self-absorbed and/or illiterate. Insults simply don't matter - but they will notice if you get bent out of shape about them. If someone is offering veiled insults and they go over your head, they're wasting their time. Nothing will happen.

 With a few exceptions, social attacks accomplish the feat of making the attacker an unpleasant person. If someone offers you a gift, and you refuse to accept it, to whom does the gift belong? 

 If you believe they have power, it is a self-fulfilling prophecy. The point of the manoeuvre is your own defensive reaction.
 If you don't believe they have power, they don't.
 It's truly shocking to me how heavily normies rely on placebo effects in their social strategies. Begging to get pwned, even by incompetents.

 Tactical obliviousness works as well as genuine obliviousness. Understand they're zombies, not real people. They don't have real opinions or even real feelings. It's arcing from a short circuit and has nothing to do with you, provided you don't try to get close to it. If you're feeling generous you can point out it's unpleasant and ask if being unpleasant was the goal.

Execution as Human Sacrifice Considered Nameless

 First, the funny.

 The Greeks used to execute or banish a criminal or infamous person during plagues or famines, with the idea being that it may avert divine anger.
 https://twitter.com/GraniRau/status/1831069068553748482

 Too late. Plague is caused by famine. Famine is caused by demographic Pride, trying to maintain a population above your means.  Normally famines don't cause deadly starvation. They cause partial starvation, meaning the immune system can't be funded. Pathogens get a free ride, becoming the proximate cause of death.
 Someone who eats well and gets plenty of sunlight can't even get sick, let alone die of sickness. Plague or no plague.

 Accepting the Pride was a sin and starting to reduce population after the plague already started is hilariously retrocausal. Karma is already taking your sins out of your hide, what's the point of executing a meanyface? If they deserved to die, why aren't they already dead? If they didn't deserve to die, why are you killing them? It's a great way to offend heaven and prolong the suffering. 

 A "sacrifice" at this point is an insult. A continuing thread...

 Speaking shortly, the correct thing to do is plan on the farms "failing" every year. Never support anyone who can't be fed during a drought. If your farms do better...offer the excess to the gods. Maybe feed it to cattle, turning it into delicious meat, because inefficiency is a virtue. Never allow a "bumper" crop to feed anyone who wouldn't otherwise be fed. Can't even sell it, since doing so will drive your neighbours to zerg rush you next famine.

 Perhaps greed is, in a way, a sin. However, it is not a sin in individuals. It is a sin in the ruler, who greedily feeds his population that which is owed to the spirits. If gluttony is a sin, it's the sin of feeding a starving slum dweller, instead of fattening the lord's calfs. 

 Mortals. Dey gonna mort.

 Last, the ugly. 

 There's an account I recall that actually refers to burning heretics as burnt offerings to God. 

 Anyway, the crime of the heretic or apostate is that he's offensive to the god. His death appeased the god.
 https://twitter.com/GraniRau/status/1831061928036442142

 Truly abominable.

 First, the heavens do not want your trash. Some mortals have decided to kill some guy for mortal reasons, and now you're trying to pass the buck. "You told us to do it." Yeah, no they didn't. Profane liar, bearing false witness. Utterly repulsive.

 If the heavens want someone dead, it is very easy to tell, because they are already dead. 

 Mortals do not have time to second-guess their assessments and actions, nor those of heaven. It will have already been done.

 The above isn't a sacrifice, it's a cowardly murder. The heretic is offensive to the prey herd, so they trample him, many-many vs. one. His [[sin]] is likely being a scawwy scawwy predatur. (His real sin is spooking the herd, like a dumbass. At least plan your escape route, wtf.) They want to kill someone, then they come up with a justification post-hoc, in an attempt to shed responsibility, like a child. 

 Guess what the heavens think about letting children (grey-haired) decide who lives and dies?

 Second, nearly everyone is offensive to god. Why are you killing only one of them?
 If you truly believe those offensive to god must die, first you have to kill yourself. Children of Satan offer lies to heaven...and their religion is violently replaced. What a coincidence.
 Imagine thinking the offensive must die, then thinking heaven will be appeased by deleting fewer than 1% of the offenders. What kind of desperate bleeding heart pauper do you imagine your god to be? Prideful children of Satan can't imagine a higher power that's any higher than they are...

 Imagine running up a million-dollar loan. When the interest is called due, the debtor offers nine pennies to the bank. "Hey, this is enough, right? Approve another loan!" It's a disgusting insult. How stupid do you think they are?
 Admittedly they approved the loan in the first place. A deeply mysterious behaviour.

 Anyway, imagine seeing something so depraved that even mortals can't tolerate it, and thinking, "I know, let's give it to heaven." 

 You know who loves trash? Pigs. Taking trash mortals don't care for and transmuting it into delicious chops is exactly what pigs are for. They'll try to eat you anyway if you trip in the pen, so it's not like they're going to form any bad habits from being fed criminals from time to time. 

 Hey genius, don't treat your god like a pig. 

 

 A fortiori: this is the afterlife, and not the good place. Someone condemned to hell is there precisely because heaven rejects them utterly. [Return to sender] is not the rational response. The smell of burning meat doesn't please heaven any more than it pleases you. God help you if destroying perfectly good nutrition does please you...

 Possible exception: your country is cursed by heaven because heaven finds your government offensive. Sacrifice london and washington in sacred nuclear hellfire, and you'll see. It will work out for you. I can't imagine it would be enough, but it would be a good start. You'll get many signs and portents: "This is the way."

Shocking News: Hoe math is a ho

 Accidentally revealed his hand. The usual trying-usurp-Satan-type Nameless One worshipper. The cover is less shallow than usual, I suppose. P.S. the fact that datepsych is worse and hoemath is better doesn't preclude hoemath being not good enough. Who is envying whom is not an important issue.

 Let's do a quick set 4. "Videogames are for manchildren." "We need to take back star wars." 

 This is what we call a [liar].

 Saying both VG and TV are for irrelevant manchildren is at least consistent. You can evaluate the state of the genome: nobody does this. 

 On the plus side, I worked out why chicks say they hate VG so much. It's precisely because it isn't chock-full of propaganda. "How dare you not chug the poison." Goodness, you're right, what was I thinking.
 Woke VG almost always fails immediately. Woke TV works fine and has since the days of silent video; you have to go all the way to cuties before you see serious pushback. 

 Most likely the reason he hates videogames is the same for every VG hater: he was challenged to a game and lost. Whoops. He tells you not to care about VG precisely because he does care about VG, as opposed to laughing off the loss as "meh, it's just a game."

 Most likely he does want to take back star wars et al because recognizing that TV watchers are manchildren is too [blackpill] for him. Secondarily, "Whoops, I accidentally my whole audience."
 You get it, right? In what way, shape, or form did star wars fans, of all people, deserve to fend off the feminist invasion? I bet the Amish have male-only spaces. I haven't checked, it's just a hunch. Have you tried deserving a male-only space? 

 I bet you, dear reader, can find a de-facto male-only space. I bet you can find one very, very easily. Do you even need to move your eyes?

 Hoe math doesn't like anime because he's a ho. Anime isn't chock-full of Nameless Regime propaganda. It's not [popular] or [socially acceptable]. Hence, a) who cares and b) it's important that everyone holds anime in contempt, upholding the feminist order. 

 Whoopsie doodle.

 Aposiopesis is a sin. If men weren't weak, feminism would never have worked on them. Men are weak because black government is dysgenic.

 

 Check: who is your pope? Who is your king? No king? Not right wing. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 Knows curt doolittle personally, did not take him as his pope. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

 "But alrenous, democracy occurs when there are no worthy kings." Yes. You know that, I know that, but they don't know that. They're not eschewing kings due to having taste, they perceive kings then choose not to enter the king's hierarchy. 

 In abject submission to the Nameless tyrant, it is not even attempted.
 It is not illegal to swear fealty to your rightful lord...because it doesn't need to be.

The Confoundance of Science

 There are some who believe all advancement comes from tinkering engineers, and scientific theory only justifies the technology after it already exists.

 There are some who believe engineer tinkering is useless without scientific theories to corral and discipline the search.

 There are some who believe it's all average IQ. Except...why wouldn't the innovation class band together, regardless of the quantity of dross? Indeed universities already existed to perform that exact function...

 There are some who believe it's purely wealth. Inventions appear when the society can afford them. This is a version of average IQ. When the black death or emigration to the new world means the society no longer has to burden itself with the lowest classes, it can afford more technology. Steam engines appear when lathes can machine pistons to the required tolerances. Lathes themselves appear when economic growth, in excess of government cancer, permits smiths to expand their tooling...

 ...and it's kind of important to know which one it is. Or to add up the relative contributions. 

 Clearly, there are none who believe science is the result of the disciplined search for wisdom. Nobody is that stupid.

Ascended Aside: Catholicism vs. Capital Punishment

 Contrary to modern-day perceptions, the early medieval church actually was repelled by capital punishment.

 https://ol.reddit.com/r/history/comments/j0yq5w/was_the_death_penalty_really_that_common_in/?rdt=53080 

The saying was that "the Church abhors the shedding of blood." 

 That is: when ""modern"" countries do away with the death penalty, they are being especially christian, as is meet for a christian race living under fundamentalism. 

 

 The deviance is obvious. In those days, the tithe was mandatory. Can't offer a tithe if you're dead. The church, like all mortal institutions, is in favour of private profits + public costs. A fortiori, luxury envy/spite beliefs: they want to [[forgive]] the criminal, showing they're so rich they're unbothered by crime.
 Which is to say, [never get so racist you forget white leftists are the worst people in the world].

 Reddit is awful 99.9% of the time, but that 0.1% appears to reliably show up on search engines, so there's that.

Reminder that Women Can't Abstracts

 Women can't understand the idea of [men] per se. What they understand is specific concrete instances of [man].

 E.g. if she says, [the world would be great without men] what she means is she feels like the world would be perfect if one particular male that she is currently mad at did not exist. 

 E.g. [I hate men] means she's mad at her dad, or mad at her ex. 

 The woman is confused when you treat these as real abstracts rather than fake abstracts. She's not putting it abstractly because she wants to talk about general categories, she puts it abstractly because she perceives this is the fashion. She's signalling submissiveness. She believes it is completely obvious that the abstract is fake and you're supposed to ask about how the poor darling was hurt recently by some specific character in her life. 

 The woman is perfectly aware that her feeling is meaningless and effervescent, which is why she doesn't offer a disclaimer. She's taking it for granted so hard that, if you don't take it for granted, she assumes you're just being mean - genuinely can't comprehend not taking it for granted.

 It's not about the facts. She's obviously upset. You're supposed to comfort her. "But I'm some random stranger?" No you can't possibly be some random stranger. She hasn't gone outside - no woman is ever allowed outside. She hasn't snuck past the guard at the fence to try to get raped by the cannibal tribe hunting the next herd over. You have to be Ingroup. You're either family or a close family friend. Clan member. 

 It's important, so I'll say it repeatedly: it's not about the facts. She doesn't care about the facts, statements of fact are merely vehicles for confessing her feelings. It's hard to work out because she doesn't know how to speak so good. Not particularly fluent or literate. Let her have a few tries. Triangulate what she was trying to say.

 A fortiori: she doesn't care about the facts, she will never behave based on the facts. She won't even act based on her feelings. She can't do anything if a man doesn't allow her first. She's going to do what she perceives she was told to do, regardless, regardless, and regardless. If you talk to her on a factual level you're just being mean. 

 If she's telling you all men are pigs are whatever, well, she can't be talking about you, can she? You're the one she's trying to manipulate into comforting her. Does she want comforting from a pig? Clearly not? Even women aren't that dumb. It's a 4-point IQ difference, not a 25-point.

 Don't treat women like they're men. Even if she asks to be treated with [respect] or whatever. Especially don't treat them like men if they ask to be treated like men. It will not work out for you.
 Unless you want to pick a fight and have a gossip war declared on you, I suppose. Then yeah, it's just the thing. Go nuts. 

 It can't possibly be her fault, after all. It happened to her because some man told her to do it, and she did, because everything she does is because some man told her to do it. She's mad at that specific man, and perhaps can't admit it to you because he's scary and might get mad back. Men have social skills, right? You can guess what she's really thinking based on some vague hints, right? Better skills than her, at any rate.

On Competence and Assassination

 Central Insanity Asylum. 

 Let's talk about lenin briefly.

 "The intended signal to begin the bombardment was a red lantern, but no one could find one. When the Bolshevik commander ventured into the city to do so, he got lost and fell in a bog."
 https://twitter.com/Antweegonus/status/1685402085259464704

 The Federal Bungler Institute is approximately this competent. They obviously want trump dead, but they can't hire anyone who can aim. 

 The problem is that the [[[right]]] wing of america is the same.

 "By evening, the majority of the few cossacks and cadets who were supposed to be defending the Palace simply left to go drinking or find some dinner."
"Of the three dozen shots fired, only two even hit the Palace (not exactly a small target), and did little more than chip the corners. Nonetheless, the barrage so scared the remaining members of the “Women’s Shock Battalion” garrisoned there that the whole company of them had to be escorted to the rear of the Palace to calm down."

 Note the white army, the [[[anti]]] communists, already had a women's battalion. Black government gonna...black? Called themselves white precisely because they were pitch coal...

 Anyone competent can tap the Nameless Regime and it will fall over. However, nobody competent needs to mess with that sewage lagoon. Why go anywhere near it? 

 The Freedom Buggering Instigators can't hire anyone who can aim, because they rightly suspect the sharpshooter would aim at his nominal boss. The big guy just can't help himself. If they hire anyone competent and willing to kill, their HR department will rapidly get depopulated. Of necessity, the guy will have to know how to avoid doing anything that gets the local cops excited...

 P.S. The media [[sentiment]] is irrelevant. If nobody is hired for the job (with tax dollars) then it won't be done. Same as any other job in america. 

 Trailing indicator:
 "Russian left-wing and right-wing newspapers alike were reporting the intended coup date of 25 October for over a week prior. The plan was an open secret,"
 They're incompetent, so the thing leaks like a sieve. 

 This is why you don't have to immediately move to asia to escape the european gulag. The plans for them will show up in the news at least six years in advance. The normies will think it's a joooooke or whatever, so there won't even be a spike in immigration applications until it's far too late.

 

 The consistent desire to assassinate him suggests the Nameless Regime believes trump will get so many votes it will overwhelm even active fraud measures.