Monday, November 4, 2024

If the squirrel's owner hadn't doxxed himself, nobody would know who to send the complain/harassment to

 I heard a guy homesteading on federal land got his cabin seized and bulldozed.

 ...because he was youtubing it. Yeah. Hey moron, don't broadcast your illegal behaviour. The Regime will notice if you set up a flashing neon sign pointing directly at your own face. 

 Imagine walter white livestreaming his meth lab. Including shots from the outside, so the lab can be located.
 Turns literally asking for it is a bad idea. Who knew. Shocking news.

Sword + Shield Beats Sword + Sword

 When facing sword+sword with weapon+shield, ironically the shield becomes your main weapon. 

 

 Sword beats unarmed.

 Two swords beats one sword. Engage their weapon with one of yours, then stab with the other weapon.
 You can sometimes simply slice with both swords, and they'll only be able to parry one. Unfortunately if they're smart and know they can't win but don't run away, you invite a suicide attack. Best to ensure the parry while going for the stab. 

 There's a good reason not to wear shields around town. They're inconvenient. Heavy, bulky, in the way. Same reason you don't casually walk with a spear. Presumably there was a good reason not to wear two swords around town, but I have no idea what it might be. I mean, I understand samurai did wear two swords around town.

 Sword and shield beats two swords. Engage their weapon with yours, then shield bash. Your shield can attack and defend at the same time.
 If they're trying to attack with their other weapon, try to break their wrist. If they're trying to defend, you can try to shove their weapon into their own body. If they try to pull back from your shield, shield-check them. Regardless of what they're doing with the main hand, you can lash out towards it with your shield, both blocking the weapon and slamming a big heavy shield into them. They will probably realize they're losing and run, but if they don't, keep at it until you've done enough damage to make them drop the weapon. Whereupon it's like two-sword vs. one sword. Set up a block and go for the stab at the same time. Checkmate.

Sunday, November 3, 2024

Instant Nopes

 "Talented amateur?"

 "Keep pretending. But at least you put the effort in."
https://www.royalroad.com/fiction/65040/an-unborn-hero/chapter/1131089/chapter-7-suspicions

 If your girlfriend says that to you, dump her immediately. Just turn around, walk away. Block her phone number. Nope the hell out. 


 See also: apparently naps are a reverse-gender shit test. If she wakes you up from a nap just because, look at her funny, then pack. Don't say anything. Donezo. Not salvageable.
 Make sure you give her the test earlier rather than later.

Women, Not Children, Impressionable

 You can approximate a hunter tribe as all one family. Women aren't supposed to be allowed outside the walls or camp, at least not without a close escort. Consequently, women aren't supposed to ever meet someone they're not related to. They totally lack the machinery to be critical or discerning. Even if one or two brats are incorrigible liars, the local bigman can tell her not to trust them, and it's a one-time thing. Women are biologically incapable of real distrust.

 A trustworthy stranger is a contradiction in terms. Most strangers will trip the I-am-a-stranger fixed action pattern. Strangers see you as a stranger, meaning the fixed action pattern will drive them to try to scam you. Why not take your tribe's resources for their tribe?

 Consequently, if you let strangers talk to women, their heads will be full of nonsense. You may be familiar with this phenomenon. Quite possibly you've seen it yourself. 

 Memes aren't real. In men. In women, very real. If you allow meme peddlers access to their ears, then their heads will be a competitive lie warzone, with the most virulent falsehoods rapidly becoming dominant.

 Literally a poison jar. Literally. 

 

 You can tell the women who go on "dates" know they need to distrust men. They don't actually manage to do it. They might learn a few anti-Game defences by rote, but men evolve faster than women can possibly hope to keep up with. Distrust is too masculine, only dikes have a real shot. (Which is yet another reason lesbian relationships are so cringe.) 

 

 Memes 2.0: hysterical illnesses are contagious in women and idiots. Fads and fashions are contagious only in women. Even incredibly effeminate Democrat Male isn't helplessly vulnerable.
 Cognitive dissonance is wholly feminine. A man simply discards one of the beliefs.

 Incorrigible brats 2: the local bigman hacks her [trust all men] machinery by placing one man against another. Perhaps this is why women evolved to see non-breeding males as not-male, as a hack so that she wouldn't have a seizure and crash when men disagree. P.S. Don't argue in front of women, they can't handle it. Cannot deal, cannot cope, cannot even. Men are supposed to be aware that women and children can't handle debate, so they hash it all out backstage and appoint a representative for opening night. It's not in the genes because the genes never imagined farmers could possibly grow up that ignorant. 

 Those of you with girls: consider that you're lucky if your woman ever doesn't lie to you. Without a male priest regularly telling her what to think, women are spending all their time listening to other women, which they're too not-male to understand they need to deprecate. Her genes think they do have a priest, and if he hasn't told them to discount something, it must be true.
 That is: going to church-equivalent every week is critical for women, and going at all is downright insulting for men. Having everyone go is wildly unstable, and having nobody go is also unstable.

  

Posiwid: egalitarianism is used in part to ensure women believe only poison. Some try to push back by trying the [impressionable children] out-lie-Satan strategy. The idea is that protecting children from [[misinformation]] will also protect women, but since it's a lie, it's weak. E.g. women can always access male idea spaces by (falsely) claiming to be adults due to age. Then they'll meet strangers. Then their heads will be full of poison.

you have to admit that script is really good

 If, tomorrow, I tell the press that, like, I will rape a truckload of local daughters, or a million gangbangers will be housed at taxpayer expense in your state, nobody panics, because it's all 'part of the plan.' But when I say that one little old squirrel will die, well then everyone loses their minds!

Saturday, November 2, 2024

Worth Repeating: Tyranny Supply Exceeded Demand

 The oppression economy is administered by mortals, which means the mortals can overshoot, supplying more tyranny than is demanded. Indeed it's inevitable. 

 When this occurs, there is some minor pushback. A recession in the tyrant economy. Because demand calls forth supply, the oppression suppliers find they can't provide all the oppression they were planning on. 

 Much of the action is former tyranny consumers becoming producers, supplying it to previous producers. Everyone and especially the merchant caste makes a much bigger deal out of this than the underlying shifts support. 

 The tyranny happened because the voters hate themselves. The self-hatred hasn't gone anywhere. It's this: "Yeah I hate myself, but I don't  hate myself that much." It's this: "Actually I do hate myself that much, but I'll physically die if you keep this up, and how am I supposed to torment my worst enemy (me) if he's dead?"

Out-Lie Satan Strategy

 This strategy is a full cuck strategy. It's obvious that trying to peddle a falsehood to the Father of Lies is not going to work out for you, but how does that work out physically? Why is this Alchemical correspondence predictive?

 The out-lie Satan strategy is about challenging the defect throne without challenging it. It's a one-level self-contradiction. 

 Our Nameless sovereigns peddle the egalitarian lie. Then [[rightists]] or [[conservatives]] try to out-lie the Nameless One, to prevent the toxic effects of the egalitarianism lie without having to challenge Egalitarianism. 

 E.g, if men and women are identical, and men can decide who they marry, women must also be able to decide who they marry. Except women obviously can't decide this. Thus [[conservatives]] come up with [age of consent] to prevent tiny 13-year-old girls from marrying themselves off to whichever violent thug threatens/extorts her first. The Nameless Ones then twist this to prevent established adult men from being able to get virgin brides - the violent thugs extort tiny girls for whore sex instead of marriage, lol. Great work, [[rightists]]. Lies always serve Namelessness. [Age of consent] fails to protect juvenile women and does functionally support and uphold Egalitarianism. 

 If you want to challenge Satan without challenging Satan, you are a Satanist. You submit to Namelessness. It might look like virulent cowardice, but naturally Satanists are without honour. It's faith.

 Correspondence two: lying under a Nameless regime is inherently about submitting to Satan. Trying to usurp the liar throne without challenging lies per se. 

 Subversion of deviant structures supports those structure. The usurper always claims (falsely) that black kings have legitimacy. The usurper, and his opponents claiming he's a usurper, both assert that the black throne gives you the right to betray the realm. Opponent: "I'm fine with being extorted and betrayed, just not by you in particular." Voting against the Establishment in an election supports the idea that the elect are allowed to steal all your stuff. Defrauding a vote only works if the vote-winner gets indemnity against dishonourable, traitorous crimes.

 Trying to usurp the liar throne always fails as usurpation, it always reinforces Nameless doctrines.

Friday, November 1, 2024

Crime Rate at School

 A low-crime country like switzerland sees 0.5 murders per 100,000 subjects.

 Something like 16-17% of female school students suffer some kind of sexual assault from a teacher et al before graduation. That would be 16,500 per 100,000. This rate is literally worse than haiti.

 I'm not joking even a little when I say the proper name for someone at school is a [victim].
 I'm not joking when I call them concentration camps. They are war crimes.

 Of course, having such high crime rates is the point of Communism. If parents didn't want their little princesses to get raped, they wouldn't send them to school. I don't call it prostitute school for fun, though of course the real name is pedophile school. Suitable for Democrat Pedophile Man. Pedogogue => pedophile. As ought to be expected.

 Fun fact: using unofficial surveys, you get numbers like 40,000 per 100,000. That's, uh, awfully coincident with the rate of first marriage divorces - 43%. That is, of the married population, 57% never get divorced. Good for them.
 If she got pimped out at school, she can't stay married. So it would seem. Children are not resilient - this 40% rate includes unnormal flirting and failed verbal propositions. The kids are not okay, and haven't been for at least 140 years. They do not turn out fine. Usually the literal rape victims become de jure prostitutes, like porn stars. Dose, response.

 This is one reason rotherham isn't a real scandal. Nobody gives a shit if little girls are raped, not even the parents. If you wanted to shut down rapists or pedophiles, you would have jailed every schoolteacher in the 1800s.
 As usual, it's slave humblebragging. "I got my daughter raped more than you, neener neener." Got that v-card punched. That's so victim. All the other slaves goblin green with envy. "Man, why can't I get myself oppressed like that? *scuffs floor*" 

 You can't say immigrants don't belong here without saying schoolteachers don't belong here. It simply doesn't make any sense. You can't possibly be serious. 

 It should go without saying, but crime rates are tightly correlated. You only have to measure one crime to get a decent estimate of all crime. Physical assault is also clearly in the 30,000 kind of range per 100,000 at school, for example. School exposure itself is directly responsible for at least 10% of pre-18 mortality, which means it's responsible for a similarly astronomical murder rate, more than ten times that of e.g. switzerland conservatively. For america, schools kill as many children as all other lawbreakers combined, at least, and that's conflating the european, african, and drug cartel murder rates. Check out the mortality cliff when school is out for the summer, or when schools are closed due to covid or whatever.

 Of course by jail I mean the gibbet. 

 "If it saves just one child...will nobody please think of the children..."
 lol
 lmao even