Historical Roots of Wokecostals

 Some are tempted to say wokism is a christian heresy. They are in fact editing the bibble. They notice you can't say both X and Y at the same time, and they take the rational path of keeping that which has more or stronger bibblical support and deciding the rest doesn't fit. E.g. there's a few weak passages against lying, they throw all those out with prejudice.

 I would call it christianity but less wrong. It strikes me as a purer version of the intended message. They use it because it strikes them the same way.

 However, this suggests the christianity drives their beliefs. That's a journalism. SJWs are SJWs because that's what they're biologically like. They used modified christianity because modified christianity supports what they were going to do anyway.
 
 Which is to say the original authors of those sections were biological SJWs. "Trust a snake before a jew, trust a jew before a greek." The founding mothers wanted to recreate a classical polity, and they truly succeeded, including adopting the average greek's extraordinary fondness for prevarication. Diogenes and the other good philosophers were in radical opposition to the startlingly dishonest hellene culture. "Man is a poolitical animal," is more of a moral injunction. "Make yourself a poo golem, plz and tks."

 Thus in america poo golem phenotypes are not selected against. Instead virtue is selected against. Hence the proliferation of sewage voters.

 The check is that julius kaisar was an SJW. Literally antifa, except not a coward and not a moron. The strongest degenerate gooning sodomite to ever live. Do you know why he [crossed the rubicon]? Because there were cops waiting on the other side to jail him due to breaking the law all the goddamn time, and his immunity had just expired. Terrorist. Billy ayers et al. A serious [what is the penalty for being late] moment, but he was in the wrong more than the poolicy.
 Kaiser is why immunities aren't done anymore. They can't keep short-term thinkers out of office. If you asked kaisar what he would have felt like if he hadn't had breakfast this morning, he would have told you he did have breakfast this morning.
 
 The bibble didn't cause wokeness. Fundamentally criminal phenotypes, kaisar's fellow tribesmen, wrote the bibble. The parts of the bibble the wokies like were written by their ancient compatriots.

 Most of what they're throwing out was also poolitical. The ancients pwned their rivals by being slightly less debased in those cases. Praise be to, uh, someone, those parts are no longer poolitically useful and can be discarded. !!Progress!!

 For completeness I will mention parts of the bibble that aren't intentionally bad, like [don't steal], which are good because they essentially predate the hebrews. When the oral culture was corrupted, for poolitical reasons parts of the old basically righteous structure were preserved. Not want Satan wanted, but Satan was not all-powerful and couldn't have everything he wanted.
 Not coincidentally yeshua's ghostwriters tried to say all those parts had been superseded. Mohammed too. It didn't quite work, so this time around the wokies say christianity per se has been superseded.

 This works because christian values are ingrained into the culture after 900 years of incessant Satanist engraving. Sheer inertia is more than enough to replace ye ansient "holy" book.
 E.g. the online troll usually doesn't bear false witness against his neighbour. He bears false witness against himself - the bibble doesn't say anything about that! E.g. Concern trolling is nothing but weaponized christian !!charity!!.

 I wonder if the !!constitution!! was supposed to replace the bibble, or if that was merely a lucky opportunity. They still have old written support, see? Woke is Trad, you just don't get it. All Men (including woMen) are created equal. Old dead guys said so and weren't instantly smitten by Zeus' bolts, it must be true.
 
 On the contary that lincoln fucker fought a whole war to prove men are !!equal!!, and he won, see, that means ares approved. That makes it christian, right? It had nothing to do with having a 0% chance of letting all those taxpayers off the plantation. Especially had nothing to do with the fact slaves don't pay taxes, but sharecroppers do. All hail the IRS. Stand and salute the tax man.

 Which is say the following isn't bad, as long as you keep in mind that christians are batshit zealots. Fundamentalist nutters, who [[[struggle]]] with cognitive dissonance instead of, you know, fixing it. https://www.thepsmiths.com/p/joint-review-origens-revenge-by-brian

"Does saying that make me a lib?"
Yes. Yes it does. Cue midwit meme.

VG Addiction Considered Good

 Most video games have a serious fundamental problem. They can't reward you for success, they can only punish you for failure. It can only reward you, so to speak, by reducing your opportunities to fail.

 To use a reverse example, minecraft is tremendously popular because it can be rewarding.

 Games are shockingly unfun. I've said it before: you work most games, you don't play them. There's nothing intrinsically rewarding about the game world. Your overseer gives you a list of tasks, and you complete the tasks. Chores, but prettier than usual. E.g. mario 64 literally gives you a gold star.

 One key feature of play is precisely that it isn't paratelic. It has a goal, but the goal was picked by the player, not some outside agent. Like, you don't spontaneously do your chores, right? If your house would stay dust-free without sweeping, you wouldn't sweep. Something with intrinsic merit is done spontaneously. You don't go tobogganing to get to the bottom of the hill. If a game can only [reward] you with the ending, if a game with no ending is a bad game, then it's a bad game even with the ending. 

 If you're [good] enough at a game, it removes all opportunities to fail. Yet, if you can't fail, you can't succeed. You're not winning the game. You're not playing it at all. If you "win" a fight in an RPG you get XP, your levels go up. If you "win" too much then you can kill bosses by hitting the fight command over and over like a dipping bird. Chore.

 If you [fail] the game [punishes] you by making you play the game more. Imagine failing to eat a delicious cake and being "punished" by not getting fat and having to eat another. Hence, the game can't even truly punish you per se, the game itself is punishment. You're punishing yourself by choosing to play it at all. You [win] against the game by forcing it to punish you the least. Hence speedrunning. 

 "I'll show you, I'll show them all!"
 "Cool, what's the plan?"
 "I'm going to subject myself to 1000 or more hours of this game! Then it will barely be able to make me play it at all!"

 Perhaps true genius has never been tried.

 Perhaps I ought to heartily endorse VG addiction, because you will build resistance to skinner boxes. You will get bored not of this game or that game, but any and every artificial plastic-game, including non-video kinds. When you emotionally, reflexively recognize that vampire survivors is merely trying to manipulate you, that skill generalizes. 

The Spy's Preferred Environment

 The CIA (or more relevantly MI6) adores crime because spies are dysfunctional rejects who stand out like sore thumbs unless they're surrounded by other misfits. Disguise is a myth. If you have a serious bum and crime problem, then a spy can at least competently pretend to be a puke-soaked vagrant without undue notice.

 If your internet forum is inundated by morons and trolls, the spy's toddler-like social skills stop being remarkable. The CIA couldn't into usenet, thus, AOL.

 The real reason the FBI keeps running KKK and nazi rings is because their [undercover] agents fit right in. You can't put them anywhere else. Skinhead is, in fact, a term of endearment that refers to feds. Or else.

 Discord is 50% pedophiles because spies are creepy as fuck. Pedo-adjacent. Would all get banned instantly out of sheer ick if pedos (or furries) weren't normalized.

 You have to read catcher in the rye in school so that when you encounter holden caulfield in the wild your first thought isn't about how hard he glows.
 See also, stuff like david eddings. His gandalf expy 'disguises' himself as a degenerate diogenes all the time...because he has no other option. Your town better already have a town drunk, or else.

 A non-small part of the reason broken window policing works is because you accidentally drive off all the spies. Lose all your saboteurs and provocateurs. Holding members to standards on pain of exile is anathema to 'clandestine' operations.

 Relatedly, immigration is always a crime. Winners stay home, only losers need to try their luck elsewhere. The only guys worth importing don't want to leave. Immigrants = spies because immigrant = criminal.

 As a hilarious example, cross-dressing doesn't work...but women, especially, don't want to be spies. Solution: trannies. If you make it a whole 'trend' your spies can get into female spaces, now can't they? Their inability to disguise themselves is no longer a handicap.
Doubly funny since you don't need spies in female spaces. They're delighted to narc and snitch. But spies are genuinely that dumb.

 The CIA likes hollywood because it needs them to train and equip its spies. Costume-laundering front. I think this may be far more profound than it looks...

 I start to think modern 'liberalism' is specifically spy Democracy...

 Art is left-wing because art is only produced by patronage, and the patron is a bunch of spies. All TV shows are woke because the executive producer is either CIA or doesn't exist. In 2013 this connection became legal and nearly above-board. I mean, maybe netflix is NSA instead or something.



 Newton invented spies for [the mint], which was a euphemism for the central bank. The locus of legalized counterfeiting; he needed extraordinary efforts to suppress his counterfeiting competitors. At this point, perhaps it was inevitable that the spy agencies would take over the government, leading to centuries of spy-based rule. Especially inevitable given the fact they started hunched over the purse, muttering [my precious].

 Coinage (not money per se) was invented, of course, for the purposes of taxing more harshly. Today, parasitism is still the primary function of coinage and any coin-backed bank note. They have kings on the faces because that's who it's for. That's the customer.

Commoners vs. Health in Democracy, Overton Immobility, & Working as Intended

  Democracy/Fascism is largely about cope for the Envious. However, bystanders get swept up, and also become the enemy of all virtue. Having spent a lifetime degrading the strong, the rich, and the wise, if they meet one of these, they become terrified. What if he decides to hit back? The commoner is well aware he will lose any fight with someone healthy.

 The commoner can't imagine how little the healthy man regards his words, if they were even noticed. The idea of not being harmed by mere sounds is incomprehensible.

 The commoner turns to pre-emptive self-defence. Have to get him before he gets you. Which is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Now the commoner has become the healthy man's enemy. Now the healthy man must "neutralize" the commoners before he can get anything done.
 Or rather, the healthy man has seen this before. Anyone who appears healthy will be attacked by the zombie horde, in a desperate attempt to drag them down to their level before it's too late. Democracy makes The People the enemy of their own champions and paragons.

 E.g. wignats think [[[whiteness]]] will save them from having to admit their betters are better, or having to leave them alone. The [[race]] will do something, rather than some set of particular individuals.

 Also why race science is so very persecuted. The debate is folk who think literally every human is identical, or those who think only all members of a race are identical. (By default, only hajnal europeans are human.) By showing that races have differences, race science lends power to the [[national]] Communists.
 As usual with commoners, they have low-resolution, binary thinking. All [[Men]] are created equal - and everyone who isn't a [[Man]] is meaningless trash. 1 or 0. If blacks aren't 1, aren't [[Men]] literally the same as everyone else, then they're 0, they are all and without exception the worst kind of slave.
 And that's your overton window. The real overton window can't be moved in the slightest. A titanium frame, riveted in place.
 Very satanist. All positions are obvious lies. They're all loser positions. None of them can achieve dominance, they all have knockdown arguments against. The commoners could escape the trap without escaping the window if they could achieve nuance, but naturally the window was framed there precisely because this is where the impossible nuance is the only escape.

 Nuance or loyally obeying their betters, of course. Should go without saying.

 Don't forget there's a similar subtext debate about whether women are [[[human]]] or not. Or, occasionally, if men are [[[human]]]. The feminist [exact equality line has to held up at all costs, or else why not overtly enslave every woman, all women? Those are the only two viable options, right?

 As always, plato was wrong about democracy differing from tyranny. "he will be governed entirely by the bad and the desire for the bad"
 Does satan worship lead to Democracy, or does Democracy always converge upon Demoncracy, a fundamentalist theocracy of satanism? Perhaps no distinction can be drawn. It's the same picture.
 The degenerate desire for Freedom, for liberty as an end rather than a means, is identical to desire for Tyranny. You might be tempted to say that, having received freedom, they instantly demand relief from the effects of freedom. Allegedly the tyrant is supposed to grant them freedom. Have an Emperor, because only an Emperor has the power to decree that they are free. Really pushing water uphill on that one.
 I think they demand a tyrant directly. Democracy is not totalitarian as a minor oopsie or as an emergent result. The totalitarianism is the point. If they ever had freedom, they would use it to demand immediate tyranny. "Oppress me, and - this part is important - everyone I know!" Democrats say they love Freedom precisely because they loathe it beyond all reason. Demoncrats want freedom from responsibility, freedom from adulthood, freedom from freedom. And that's what they get. Not coincidentally, also liberated from the the lands of beauty. Free to be as ugly as possible.

The Sequences and Related Cults

 Yudkowsky's Sequences, at first blush, look like they're useless for anyone who needs to read them. If you need to read them, you can't possibly be literate. Permanent cognitive poverty. Maybe if you squint it's the midwits' guide to peak midwittery.

 But wait, they're just lying. Anyone can figure these out in under, generously, five minutes. And did. And that's the purpose of The Sequences.

 By pretending the obvious is difficult, it gives them an excuse when they intentionally indulge in Sophistry. "Forgive me Egalitarianism Lord, for I have sinned." They're just weak and fallen vessels who couldn't possibly live up to the lofty standards of *checks notes* not confusing a finger for the moon it's pointing at.  

 The bargain is: I will let you be a treacherous slime, provided you let me be a treacherous slime, and pay your shekel to the first among equals, who showed us the way, the path, and the light. Many found this to be an attractive bargain. Just, you know, not the kind of bargain you can openly advertise for. Some subtlety is called for (not too much).

 

 Coincidentally I just found out big yud used a japanese phrase, of all things, to allegedly encourage his cult to not be ashamed of pulling ahead.
 The japanese. I'm dead. Should have used finnish instead, lel. 

 What genius could possibly conceive of hiding your success so as to protect it. Truly, only the most astronomically shining stars should show such stupendous skill.

 No no this is a genuinely clever exercise in camouflage. It really did make big yud a bunch of money, and I understand there were sex cults too. Yes fat? No problem! We're ~~sapiosexual~~ just like jesus platonically intended uh I mean we're all atheists here. We do everything jesus told us to do, but he didn't like exist or anything, plato was a hack we're trying to bit-for-bit copy the republic coincidentally. So much a weird coincidence.

 This whole !!science!! thing made Sophistry very difficult. How are you supposed to pretend to be scientific without, like, actually giving up your experimentally incompatible scams? Without a grant, I mean? Big yud just wanted to help. And get paid. To help and get paid and fuck some whores for free. (posiwid)

 What everyone wants, really. You understand.
 You did read the sequences, right?

 Clever, but, sadly, immediately vincible against anyone of higher IQ, as these things always go. Merely another way for mortals to mort around and divert themselves while they wait for senescence and accumulate suffering. 

 I mean, do you really think jesus didn't tap magdalene? Really? Tee hee. That's a good one.
 She wasn't a prostitute anymore, see, because she didn't take metal in exchange. Totally different.
 P.S. "Hey, don't fuck other men." "Oh damn big j, I would never have figured that out if you hadn't told me. Great advice!" "Stealing is wrong. Lying too." "Shit, dropping spicy ones over here!"

Shooting 2.0

  As with the butler shooting, my working proposition is that tyler robinson was handed blanks, and his muzzle reports existed firstly to hide the real shots and secondly to make the catchers think they found someone relevant. In this case there were two layers of patsies - hardly a difficult concept to develop. The fake shooter was chosen because he profiled as someone who wouldn't admit to having co-conspirators if told not to do so. Conveniently cops and especially the federal buttspelunking incompetents will enthusiastically accept his [lone shooter] story at face value. Cuts down on paperwork, see.

 Lone shooteroids are just lying. If you can tie your shoes you're not that stupid.

 There is in fact zero chance he didn't have blanks. Otherwise it would have been ninja numbers. Mass shooter injures 11, kills 0.
When he ditched the gun they replaced his fake rounds with the real ones and booked it themselves. The shot hit the neck because they learned not to aim at the head. They were going [centre mass] but silenced sniper rifles can barely hit the broad side of a barn. Likewise they used a bolt-action because syncing to a semiauto is a serious pain in the neck, among other advantages. That's why the firefighter was hit at butler; the real sniper barely had time to aim. This time, instead, robinson noticed when "he" hit the target first try and left, rather than firing more "rounds," very convenient for his backup.

 The butler guy was shot because he was at entirely the wrong angle and would have noticed the wound was on the wrong side, possibly noticed he had blanks, and possibly mentioned it. Turns out they missed anyway, so whatever, but never mind. Meanwhile robinson could be permitted arrest because he doesn't realize he didn't have a harmful weapon.
Blanks and real rounds sound different, and an experienced shooter with a front-row seat, such as the guy holding the gun, will notice immediately. Leftish hoplophobes are therefore chosen.

 If you want an edgy conspiracy theory, it's that this is a false flag.  Special forces, disgruntled with republicant cuckery, decided they needed motivation. Cui bon: it could hardly have been better for rightoids, after all. Same way 9/11 was, at best, a saudi operation. 3/4 of hijackers being saudi nationals, assuming the fbi didn't just lie. Had nothing to do with iran regardless.

 If instead it's [leftoids are really that stupid], they will try to shoot someone else in a few months. Because the public-assassination leftists really are that stupid. Hilariously, it might even work. Might intimidate or exhaust the republicants. "I don't have time to report more leftoids for ""free"" speech violations, I have to go to work."
 

 Later I will posting the idea that Democracies are fundamentally spy government. Now, thinking it's more precisely black ops vs. black ops. Rightoid black ops is special forces. Leftoid black ops is CIA, state, MI6, &c. Putin being KGB not a coincidence etc etc.
If you think about it, could the Envy theocracy ever be run by anyone but black ops.

Domain and Range in Logic using PD

 Mathematical functions have domains and ranges. The domain is the set of numbers which produce valid equations. E.g. f(x) = 1/x is not valid for x=0. Likewise logical proofs have domains, and the validity is restricted to the domain. 

 In the prisoner's dilemma, provided both players are rational, it is always best to cooperate. No form of defect/cooperate is possible, so the only options are defect/defect and cooperate/cooperate. So, you morons,, pick cooperate/cooperate.

 This proof is not valid for anyone who doesn't meet some minimum standard for rationality. For example, game theorists are not sufficiently rational. You can't trust them to know they ought to cooperate. 

 

 When using theoretical principles, the first important thing is to remember they have domains of validity. If you get into a car, check the gas in the tank. If you get into a theory, check the domain.
 The second important thing is using the domains in reverse. Outside the domain, the theory is flawed, and the flaw in the theory is an exploitable vulnerability. While being outside the prisoner's dilemma domain isn't proof you should always defect, it is a hint that there is some profitable defection. Further, there are times you should always defect, and in those moments, knowing the domain directs your attention to exactly the topic of defection.

 It is also possible to use the domain as a measurement instrument. If you're not sure if the theory is valid, try it, and if it's falsified, you have determined that you're outside the domain. Physicists pull a trick like this all the time. Pick up theories not for their useful conclusions, but for useful domains, for the purpose of using the theory as a domain-measuring instrument. If you have a kind of stove you can't see with your eyes, you buy a frying pan not for the purposes of cooking, but for attempting to cook, to see if a thing is a stove or not. 
 Likewise you can attempt cooperate/cooperate to test the rationality of a person. Indeed mortals are supposed to naturally do this; you permit an opportunity for a small treachery, to see if they're trustworthy.
 

 

 P.S. A [high-trust] soyciety is when you permit large treacheries without testing first. A [low-trust] soyciety is when you never attempt to be trustworthy. Turns out both never-defect and never-cooperate are bad strategies.

 

Soycial Evolution

 Mortals want to torture each other and themselves to death. A bunch of soycieties tried this, and they're not around anymore. They didn't last long enough for anyone to notice they were trying it.

 Some soycieties tried half-torturing each other to death. They are also not around anymore.

 The soycieties that survive at all have heavily compromised their core mission, in one way or another. However, as the soyciety gets richer, they compromise the compromises. They see they can afford to relax the strictures. They try to make a purer and purer version of their ultimate goal. "Surely," they say, "We can torture ourselves just a little bit more without dying?" Can't suffer if you're dead. The idea is to get as sick as possible without actually dying. As we can see, the question can be asked many times. Ultimately, however, the answer is no. The success with previous incremental re-Forms drives confidence in the last, final re-Form. They try to get as sick as possible without going over, and they always screw up and go over.

 Not to mention it's common to kill a soyciety with a slow poison, then, while dying of that, continue the re-Forms, "we didn't die yet, it's fine," continually moving up the final doom. 

 

 America looks like a place they build a ship for the express purpose of sinking it, and it looks that way because it is. They're not holing it below the water line and selling the bulkheads for scrap by accident. That's the point of the whole system. Any reform based on the idea americans want to live is fundamentally misguided. That's not the Form of the american.  

 I strongly suspect the nicene council et al knew about this. They wanted to keep soyciety poor, because a rich soyciety can't maintain its maintenance. Can't resist the urge to go out in an orgy of self-mutilation.
 "Blessed are the meek." Rich man, camels, needles, etc. Russian serfdom; the oppression was part of what kept russia from playing russian roulette. No serfs? Instant leninism. Conveniently, the tyranny of e.g. serfdom is the torture the members of soyciety crave. 

 It's why culture ossifies so readily. Any clade that didn't ossify would evolve rapidly toward extinction. Most new ideas are bad...but the good ones are deliberately suppressed, so the proportion is irrelevant. 100% of newly adopted ideas are intentionally chosen for being bad, unless there's extreme violence involved.

 The only point in soycial commentary in a suicidal soyciety is to exploit the new loopholes. Stab that blood-sucking proboscis in early, while the flesh is still juicy. Equivalently, it's important not to stand under bridges that are about to collapse. When your americoid neighbours go beaver and start gnawing in the supports, find another place for your homeless encampment.

Examples of Definition Failure

 Plato talked about forms. He was confused. The literature contains cogent refutations from such luminaries as plato.
 What you want are definitions. Reality is too big to grasp directly. We are small and have small cognitive hands. Hence we bolt handles onto Reality and grasp those instead. The first handle is arbitrary, but after that there's right ways and wrong ways to bolt handles in relation to each other.

 Example:
 If you try to define [life] physically, you will find either nothing is alive or everything is alive. You can still make a semi-functional  handle, but you have to throw down arbitrary cutoffs. [Life is what we define as alive.]
 Life has goals. It has some outcome it will try to secure. This immediately goes recursive; life tries to stay alive. If it loses the ability to strategically direct energy, it will lose the ability to pursue any goal. This is a definition that doesn't converge. You can't define things in terms of themselves.
 [Life is something you can kill.] You can stab it and it stops moving. Machines are alive...

 You have control of actions, but not consequences. You can define things any way you want, it's fine. You can't control what the consequences of the definition are. You have to decide on an action, or definition, based on its immutable consequences.

 Alt: you define life as [having consciousness], which is not a physical property. That's cool, that works, [life] is a scalar. Except, now, when you're sleeping, you're dead. You suicidal maniac, you kill yourself at least once a day. You enjoy it, you lunatic.

 Natural language works by arbitrary definition. You have a type specimen and a fuzziness quotient. A cat is defined by a platonic [form of the cat] except that platonic form is brain-specific. The fuzziness - how different something can be and still be a cat - is also arbitrary. These types of definitions are not logically useful. The form is hard to communicate. The form is an inaccurate recording of the specimen. Even if it wasn't inaccurate, the specimen has changed and therefore no physical object does or will match the definition. It's a quick and dirty pragmatism for the stupid.