It is completely absurd to suppose that an establishment that can't predict the weather two weeks from now can predict the climate ten years from now. This is the kind of stupidity only someone very very intelligent could possibly believe in.
Worth repeating: also, the results are in. They can't predict the climate ten years from now. This experiment has been run. They have no idea what they're talking about. There is no such thing as a climatologist. Not to mention the planet is currently uncomfortably cold (ice age) and being warmer would a) a good thing and b) geologically normal.
However, we're doing a hypothetical. What if global warming was real and bad? Some true things are absurd. For example, Americans are absurdly evil and slavish; this doesn't mean it's in any way untrue.
You still shouldn't believe it, because the only possible argument for this position is far too complicated. How can a chaotic system become less sensitive to initial conditions over time? If this were true, only true top geniuses could possibly understand it.
Climatologists are not exactly world-class mathletes. They shouldn't be able to understand their own field. (And hey look: they don't.)
Climatology should be some quantum chromodynamics shit. Except you can't use perturbation theory due to the sensitivity to initial conditions. Climatologists should be inventing new math left and right to acquire analytic solutions.
The difference being that you can experimentally demonstrate the results of quantum chromodynamics, so understanding the argument isn't necessary. You can see it works the way they said it was going to work, regardless of why they said it would work that way. There's no shortcut to demonstrating what happens in 100 years, you have to wait 100 years, and by then it's clearly too late. "Precautionary principle" just means [believe all liars and idiots].
Even if climatologists were top mathletes inventing new math and analytically solving for this weird anti-chaotic system, it should be normal to not believe in them because you can't possibly understand the argument. They would not sound smart, they would sound [timecube]. It would be impossible to sell governments on the arguments, what with governments not being made of solely clones of Newton.
In every possible way, the world does not look the way it would if [[climate change]] were real.
Cue midwit meme: discount implausible things.
Climate is a wonderful demonstration of the fact voters don't believe things due to being convinced. They are slaves; they believe in what they're told to believe in. American slaves are also told to claim they're not slaves, and to claim they think critically instead of slavishly, so they indeed claim these things. If slaves have any understanding of the words coming out of their mouths, these are lies.
It was worth having 3-4 climatologists try to predict the global climate to see if it was unexpectedly easy. Turns out nothing unexpected happened. Climate is an intractable problem; the only way to predict it is literal magic. To take the physical measurements would require violating the laws of physics. You need a super-Turing machine. The instruments would be part of the variables you wanted to measure, requiring bigger instruments, which would also be relevant, and...
Time to shut down the field.
No comments:
Post a Comment