I'm starting to think that leftism is the result of inbreeding.
Try not to marry your first cousins, folks. It a generation or two it leads to opposition between parents and children, "in his youth he was a spendthrift and womaniser," plus "patron of the arts" inevitably implying drinking and carousing.
"Frederick settled down following his marriage [...] Quickly accumulating large debts"
When Wikipedia tries to write a fluff piece for you, indicating favour, it's a terrible insult and you should demand satisfaction.
Haven't tested this yet.
However, it seems like peasants are inherently inbred. Probably forget who their grandparents were. Lie to the priest about consanguinity because they simply don't know any better. Alternatively the lowborn priest lies for them because there's nobody nearby they're not kinda related to.
The thing about inbreeding is you can't erase it easily. If you outbreed for a generation or two, it means 1/2 or 1/4 of your genome is still inbred. Maybe you get lucky and it's not the bad part, or maybe you get unlucky and carry the bad copies of everything, it's merely hidden under the good versions from the other side.
That's why the upper crust doesn't want to marry a peasant: even if they look like a healthy shining star, (that is, they're pretty like the princesses are), it's just the luck of the draw. The recessive half of their genes are all still terrible inbred nonsense. You get leftist children and grandchildren.
Need to calculate a local mean for that peasant, so you can figure out how far they are from the mean and thus how much regression to the mean you can expect.
3 comments:
But royals are more inbred. And Js even moreso.
The Hapsbergs weren't royal. Indeed, that's why they lost Austria. Physical appearance came, at length, into alignment with spiritual reality.
P.S. Here "royal" was used effeminiately.
Upwards of 90% of women can't think abstractly. When they say, "All men are pigs," what they mean is, "I'm mad at my dad," or, "I hate my ex."
Here, 'royal' doesn't refer to monarchies or dynasties, it refers to one or at most two specific instances that happen to be particularly available to the writer of the word.
Women think men can't think abstractly either. They cast things in abstract terms because they think that's the fashion. Just doin' what they're supposed to do. Pretending just like the men are, see?
Post a Comment