Grouping requires hierarchy. In Caino hypocriens, hierarchy is based on social status. Hypocriens social status is broken, inherently broken. Parasitic and treacherous. The hierarchy keeps collapsing, as it is adaptive to ignore or avoid social status. Selects against itself.
C. hypocriens tries to kill anyone who leaves the group. "Unity" and "Unions." C. hypocriens tries to have it both ways: no obligation to listen to those higher in the hierarchy, going for social egalitarianism, "Equality," yet nobody has to leave. Group membership without group obligations. Sucking blood isn't considered treacherous, while refusing to have your blood sucked is considered treacherous.
This ""group"" doesn't move together, and can't be called a group.
Result: internet denizens can't join a group, as they refuse to accept any group obligations.
At best you can form a loose group via selection. If you block or ban everyone who isn't like some reference individual, you get a group that moves together spontaneously, rather than because they feel responsible for the duty of moving together.
Gets worse: C. hypocriens actively fights against any non-blood-sucking group. Anyone without the ability to compel submission is held in contempt. Middle and lower-class members will actively demand oppression, like they have a tyranny quota, and become violent if you demur.
8 comments:
yesterday saw /pot8um/status/1768025215957655721 and was reminded of wowex 'and the lesson is never work retail'. but having watched some japanese ramen stall/shop videos it did not seem to me to be a "retail" problem.
skullman said "~service industry~ workers deserve it all" and occurred to me they probably do deserve it. because they want it. every complaint of this kind is always about how the customer ("retail") is stupid, not how the boss or company has set up a really dumb situation which increases the likelihood of dumb things happening. it's not just logic, demand for tyranny is real, there are people that want to eat shit so they can talk about how bad they have it, and these people are common.
is demand for tyranny worse than tyranny?
i think so.
Without demand it would be difficult and unreliable to supply.
It's fine though, once you realize the complaints are in fact humblebragging. "Good for you, slave, you got the whipping you desired. Now finish fetching my coffee." If it's a problem, well, now self-checkouts exist, as does online shopping.
P.S. I currently can't read twitter at all. The message makes sense without reading it, but if in future it won't, it won't make sense to me if you don't copy the text.
"FOLKS WITH EXPERIENCE IN THE SERVICE INDUSTRY:
I wanna hear your personal horror stories with customers.
The worst, the scariest, the moments that still haunt you at random times of the day, I want it all.
Some folks think we’re exaggerating. Let’s show em how bad it can get."
lel
The one thing every horror story has in common is the involvement of a "service industry" "provider".
Verbal pattern: the thing every one of your failed relationships is guaranteed to have in common is you.
"But but humans are awful," yeah yeah Caino hypocriens. It's C. hypocriens on both sides of the counter, though, lol.
"It can get bad," what like your boss has never seen a bad customer before? They already have policies to deal with it. If they don't, then quit before it happens.
"I can't quit," we begin to see the source of the issue.
More importantly, are these my "service" providers? Why is anyone assuming I care about their experiences? These are not my children, nor my friends, nor my vassals. None of my business.
I wonder if narcissists see more horror in "service" kek.
doesn't stop customers from being bad
doesn't stop coworkers from being bad
doesn't stop bosses from being bad
presumably also doesn't stop self from being bad
"but im not a bad person" hmm
it seems a better fit to model "but im a good person"/"but im not a bad person" as asking to be violated. which means i'm projecting some framework onto the words that isn't there. and sure enough it's not there. they're saying something about "being"; any implication that they don't want it to happen or that they don't think it should happen is something i'm putting in myself. the tweet even says "I want it all".
If they really weren't a bad person they wouldn't need to claim so, as it would go without saying.
The full phrase is, "I'm not a bad person, I'm just in a bad situation." Okay, but who put you in that situation, are you 9 years old...
Post a Comment