Imagine a married woman, looking for action on the side. Is she going to be interested in single boys? Only in extreme cases. Largely she's going to be interested in married men.
The [wink-wink nudge-nudge plausible-deniability] the taken woman needs is something she's going to be able to solicit from taken men. When a woman is looking to violate loyalty she's specifically going to want a man who also has loyalties to violate. Which looks like preselection to porn/dating addled moderns.
Put it this way. Women are hardly lacking a monopolizing instinct, which seems to go against the get-him-to-cheat instinct. Perhaps it could be [bitches be cray] as per usual, but it usually isn't. This stuff is largely coming from women who already have a man to monopolize. Preselection is about the side piece. That is, if you see a woman who likes you for being selected, she likely considers you a side piece. Not always; but certainly it happens sufficiently often.
Recall that women don't have any real romantic instincts towards the man they want to monopolize. Countless millennia of arranged marriages have sanded it down to nothing. It's all supposed to be organized and decided without any real input from her, so why would she bother thinking (rather, feeling) about it at all? Thus, if she has romantic erotic lustful feelings, it's about adultery in one form or another.
Democratic Woman is trained and grown to be an adulteress. She only gets a main squeeze specifically so that she can cheat on him. Reminder that sneaking away from her dad would also be acceptable, if voters weren't 100% women and he instead had male authority.
No comments:
Post a Comment