Women, Not Children, Impressionable

 You can approximate a hunter tribe as all one family. Women aren't supposed to be allowed outside the walls or camp, at least not without a close escort. Consequently, women aren't supposed to ever meet someone they're not related to. They totally lack the machinery to be critical or discerning. Even if one or two brats are incorrigible liars, the local bigman can tell her not to trust them, and it's a one-time thing. Women are biologically incapable of real distrust.

 A trustworthy stranger is a contradiction in terms. Most strangers will trip the I-am-a-stranger fixed action pattern. Strangers see you as a stranger, meaning the fixed action pattern will drive them to try to scam you. Why not take your tribe's resources for their tribe?

 Consequently, if you let strangers talk to women, their heads will be full of nonsense. You may be familiar with this phenomenon. Quite possibly you've seen it yourself. 

 Memes aren't real. In men. In women, very real. If you allow meme peddlers access to their ears, then their heads will be a competitive lie warzone, with the most virulent falsehoods rapidly becoming dominant.

 Literally a poison jar. Literally. 

 

 You can tell the women who go on "dates" know they need to distrust men. They don't actually manage to do it. They might learn a few anti-Game defences by rote, but men evolve faster than women can possibly hope to keep up with. Distrust is too masculine, only dikes have a real shot. (Which is yet another reason lesbian relationships are so cringe.) 

 

 Memes 2.0: hysterical illnesses are contagious in women and idiots. Fads and fashions are contagious only in women. Even incredibly effeminate Democrat Male isn't helplessly vulnerable.
 Cognitive dissonance is wholly feminine. A man simply discards one of the beliefs.

 Incorrigible brats 2: the local bigman hacks her [trust all men] machinery by placing one man against another. Perhaps this is why women evolved to see non-breeding males as not-male, as a hack so that she wouldn't have a seizure and crash when men disagree. P.S. Don't argue in front of women, they can't handle it. Cannot deal, cannot cope, cannot even. Men are supposed to be aware that women and children can't handle debate, so they hash it all out backstage and appoint a representative for opening night. It's not in the genes because the genes never imagined farmers could possibly grow up that ignorant. 

 Those of you with girls: consider that you're lucky if your woman ever doesn't lie to you. Without a male priest regularly telling her what to think, women are spending all their time listening to other women, which they're too not-male to understand they need to deprecate. Her genes think they do have a priest, and if he hasn't told them to discount something, it must be true.
 That is: going to church-equivalent every week is critical for women, and going at all is downright insulting for men. Having everyone go is wildly unstable, and having nobody go is also unstable.

  

Posiwid: egalitarianism is used in part to ensure women believe only poison. Some try to push back by trying the [impressionable children] out-lie-Satan strategy. The idea is that protecting children from [[misinformation]] will also protect women, but since it's a lie, it's weak. E.g. women can always access male idea spaces by (falsely) claiming to be adults due to age. Then they'll meet strangers. Then their heads will be full of poison.