Women Can't Responsibility

 Well over 90% of women are so retarded they can't follow the chain of cause and effect. It appears to be a focus issue. If you claim that A implies B, they lose concentration partway through 'implies.' They've stopped paying attention to what you're saying and are deeply interrogating how it makes them feel. Largely based on tone of voice and body language.

 For a woman, stuff just happens. Then, other stuff just happens. The present stuff is far too emotionally overwhelming to leave room for anything that happened before. They can't handle anything more complicated than stimulus-response. All the superstitious [if you run a fan while you'll sleep, you'll die] stuff is memorized by rote, which is why it never makes any sense. Even when there's a genuine harm to avoid, they can't understand how B is linked to A. Frequently they're not articulate enough to even understand what they're warning against, all they appreciate is "X is bad!" Anything bad that happens later is also bad, so they basically said the right thing, right? They can just about handle the idea of nebulous karma.

 You should applaud them for understanding that events are linked at all. "Good girl!" Don't expect them to actually link the right things together.

 Women genuinely can't appreciate that their current situation might have something to do with their past situation. By the time you juxtapose the two in their minds, they get distracted by something and go chasing squirrels.

 Ironically, boys get the ADHD meds because they're concentrating too much. The girls forget the old topic - but confuse the new topic as related - while the boys are still thinking about the old topic. The boys are staying on the trail while the girls are wandering off into the weeds and picking random flowers.  "when the bell rings I insist that they stop whatever it is that we've been working on and proceed quickly to the next work station." When the teacher says 'stay on topic' they mean [get lost with everyone else] and [stop revealing our absurd cope by contrast].

 "Everything I teach is out of context. I teach the un-relating of everything. I teach disconnections. I teach too much [....] What do any of these things have to do with each other?"

 "Even in the best schools a close examination of curriculum and its sequences turns up a lack of coherence, full of internal contradictions." 

 "This is harder to see in elementary school where the hierarchy of school experience seems to make better sense because the good-natured simple relationship of "let's do this" and "let's do that" is just assumed to mean something and the clientele has not yet consciously discerned how little substance is behind the play and pretense."

 Gatto fails to understand the natural result of women designing and implementing the curriculum. He was a boy and thought girls think like boys - in the same way girls are absolutely certain that boys are just girls who are bad at being girly. "they hate solitude, are cruel, materialistic, dependent, passive, violent, timid in the face of the unexpected, addicted to distraction." Well-schooled children, or default women?

 After all, accepting that girls are girly is misogynist. Someone like Gatto would never be caught being mean like that. 

 Best to realize well over 90% of girls never grow out of the play and pretense. Unlike the boys, they never assumed there was some mysterious underlying meaning - they were getting too emotional about the immediate present to handle any such stretch or reach. The only connection that matters is the connection of current topic and current feelings. 
 If you're pissed at a girl try asking her how her sentences are linked and watch her flail around in frustration. "What does this have to do with what you said just a moment ago?" Pretend you really don't know. She will fail because it genuinely doesn't have anything to do with it.

 "Think of the great natural sequences like learning to walk and learning to talk; following the progression of light from sunrise to sunset; witnessing the ancient procedures of a farmer, a smithy, or a shoemaker; watching your mother prepare a Thanksgiving feast -- all of the parts are in perfect harmony with each other, each action justifies itself and illuminates the past and the future."

 In her proper environment, a woman's sequences are imposed on her from outside. You can't teach a kid to run before they walk even if you wanted to. It happens on its own. You can't have a ten-year-old before having an eight-year-old. It's not up to her, and it's not up to you either. All she needs to know is to feed them when they're hungry and clothe them when they're naked. She doesn't understand why she's cooking the thanksgiving turkey that way, that's [the way it's always been done] (lol). Just following the recipe. (Are family recipes the result of husbands tweaking the girl's cooking so it doesn't suck? Will girls experiment at all without specific prompting?) You don't want a woman to concentrate too much because children's needs can and will interrupt irregularly, without warning. If she gets troubled by interruptions, she's a terrible mother.

 For an example, Akuyaku Reijo nano de Last Boss wo Kattemimashita. The conversations don't flow. The events are barely coherent. But it's okay, because shoujo. Keeping a plot in mind is too difficult for the poor dears' bird brains. Just have stuff happen.  

 (I especially like the part where it reveals that women think of any other woman who oppose her slightly as a terrifying evil mastermind, full of malice focused on the victim specifically and solely. Frenemies have to apologize to each other constantly to soothe the paranoia. Don't forget women are clumsy and awkward, frequently causing effects they don't intend. I suspect women's media drastically overstate the effectiveness of their ridiculous scheming - it's usually cope about these accidents, when the woman thinks it's better to confess to wrongdoing than admit to incompetence.)

 

 Women can't remember what happened before without specific prompting, and can't appreciate that the present moment might imply a particular future. She can't keep her promises because she can't remember the promise for more than a few seconds. Trying to hold a woman responsible is futile cruelty. Don't demand masculine honour, demand feminine submission. Stop her from doing the thing in the first place, regardless of her opinion. Maybe use locks. Maybe use operand conditioning. If she's being difficult and requiring illegal levels of force, dump her immediately. "Too bad, that one was a dud." Hunter tribes hit their wives and not their kids - this is indeed the way. If she hasn't evolved beyond monkey-adjacent, then consider not putting up with her. Perhaps consider a different furnace for your seed. "Sorry, marrying you was outlawed. Bye now."

 You can't leave women alone with strange men because they will genuinely forget that they have a husband. Why would they stay faithful to someone who, in that moment, doesn't even exist? Genuinely impossible. It really isn't her fault, she really does either need a chaperone or to be denied entry into mixed-gender spaces.

 Is that what the ring's for? She gets in the habit of glancing at it, and then this happens: "Hey dipshit, you're married." "Oh fuck I forgot." You want a diamond because it's likely to sparkle and attract her birdbrain even if she breaks the hand-looking habit. Actual appearance of the stone is distinctly secondary. This, likewise, is the real reason adulteresses take the ring off: it's not that it discourages the kind of men they're after, it's because it reminds them they're supposed to feel guilty, and then they stutter. 

 "You're not wearing your ring." "I'm not a woman, I'm not going to forget I have a family."

 I now suspect this is why women demand so much attention. Rather, she's demanding that you capture her attention, so she doesn't forget about you on accident. She can't focus on you unless you make her, and consequently, if she wants to focus on you, she has to demand that you make her. You want to go along with her so she doesn't genuinely start thinking she's single.

 Lots of women still drink during pregnancy. Because they forget they're pregnant. Or forget alcohol is a poison.

 From this I conclude almost all fiction is highly feminized. Nobody can remember to continue a conversation if they're distracted. Characters about to say something that would make the writer's job not completely trivial? Don't worry, dingaling there's your phone, and bam it's out your head forever like the most airheaded girl. (Can parallelize: writer A writes scene A, writer B writes scene B, but doesn't have to worry about continuity because there isn't any.)

 This is why you can pass most shit tests by mentioning something emotionally valent. They'll forget all about the test to focus on the now. It doesn't have to make sense because, even if she remembers the test, she can't tell the difference between sense and nonsense. If you tell her fire is hot because the recombination of atoms into lower-energy configurations releases energy into the environment or fire is hot because scorpio is friends with sagittarius, it makes exactly the same amount of sense to her - none. All that matters is that you say it confidently in a non-feminine voice. Sometimes she can fake a bullshit call when there's a strict social expectation, which often fools many. It would be better for everyone if she wasn't allowed to pretend to understand things she doesn't understand, because lies are bad. Mmmkay?