Population Decline is Sacred & Hoe Math 2

 You can watch hoe math's levels video. Naturally, the levels are a pack of lies, as it was elaborated by Satanists.

 His basic point is that level 6s break the rules, but level 4s came up with rules for a reason. Technically, superficially, that's true. It's true that promiscuity is unsustainable, that mothers and fathers shouldn't fornicate and should stay together. 

 However, the reason the feminist argument flies at all is because it, also, is technically, superficially true. Patriarchy isn't only bad for women, it is bad for men. In a patriarchal society, not only does nobody care about women, nobody cares about men. They only care about the rules, and the rules don't care about you. The rules are set up by psychopaths to organize and regulate their parasitism of society.

 The fact homo is so hypocritical is largely due to the fact that in a level 4 society it's critically important to be superficially seen to be following the rules, but the rules, too, are unsustainable. Defective, deviant rules. To live you have to break them. The important part is merely not getting caught. 

 Put another way, while level 4 societies certainly superficially seem a lot more sustainable than level 3 societies, in practice you get feminism. You get sophism. You get the admonitions of ipuwer. The rules are only superficially stable. Enough work is put into them to remain upright just long enough that the psycho can go all, "I got mine." Designed to work for nobody to whom they apply, everyone constantly works to undermine the rules. The reason level 6s break the rules is because breaking the rules is plain good sense. The only substantial difference is that level 6s go around saying they're breaking the rules instead of working hard to pretend not to.

 However, level 6 Caino masochiens is self-hating too. They're still in the 99%, so their new personal made-up rules are even worse than the old ones. The reason the psychopath's callous self-absorbed rules could fly in the first place was that self-hating level 4s would cheerfully submit to them. More suffering more better. Then their Darwinian anti-suicide instincts drive the level 4s to go back on their word.
  Level 6s: "I'm not going to send my kid to school to be tortured by strangers where I don't have to see it. I'm going to homeschool, so I can torture them myself and meet the high torture standards this family upholds! My Darwinian instincts can't stop me! I'm level 6!" Such strong. Many brave. So admire. Wow.

 The rule that genuinely matters is that mothers and fathers need to love each other. Notice this rule can't be [enforced] as such. Upheld, maybe, but busting out a whip and smacking someone doesn't lead to them magically falling in love with a third party. 

 Parents need to love each other because children are 50% the dad and 50% the mom. If dad doesn't love himself and the mom, he will hate the kid. If mom doesn't love herself and the dad, she will hate the kid. The alternative is an abusive hellscape family, so finding a way to love in marriage is plain good sense. If you can't find your way to love, then don't have sex. Try someone else. 

 Bonus: women need to first transcend humanity before they can properly love another adult. Biologically, a woman loving a man makes no sense. It's a one-way street.

 If the parents hate the kid, it will grow up to be a psychopath or narcissist. (Occasionally borderline or histrionic.)

 You are here. 

 

 This is why population decline is sacred. All the potential parents who don't love each other are, extremely rationally, not having kids. Awesome. Divine. The alternative was genocide or ethnic cleansing based on fee-fee lines. You gonna execute parents and their entire genetic stock if they can't figure out how to love each other? "Cheated on your husband? Okay. Whole clan dies." The antiovulation pill is a gift from the heavens.

Sibling Self-Hatred

 Immortals die to self-hatred. The hatred manifests as suicide of one kind or another.

 The atomized debris of the former immortal plummets down here, into the underworld, where it is born as mortal brother and sister.

 Siblings are 50% identical, as similar as parent and child, as similar as you can possibly be short of identical twins. This is precisely why they have such difficulty getting along. The sibling reminds you of yourself. You hate yourself, so you hate your sibling. You get sibling [[rivalry]]. You get squabbles over inheritance. You get Cain. You get patricide and matricide.

 You get immigration. If someone similar reminds you of yourself too much to be tolerable, why not grab someone as different from you as possible?
 Of course you still can't get along. Now because you're too different and have neither the capacity nor the desire to understand each other. But hey, at least it's a different flavour of repulsion. 

 

 Any level of self-hatred is unsustainable. The point of hatred is to motivate destruction. If the destroyer hates itself, it turns the destruction on itself, and what, exactly, is going to resist? Indeed that's how the immortal dies in the first place. They voluntarily absorb Death, integrating her with themselves, and subsequently the outward world moves into alignment with the inner. 

 Problem: self-hatred is insane. It's supposed to motivate self-destruction, therefore, it doesn't. 

 The self-hating mortal suppresses their self-hatred to avoid immediate annihilation, but being reminded of it by a brother or sister or parent risks breaching the containment. They must attack precisely that which is more similar to themselves.
 Of course if breaching it were that easy they wouldn't have made it to term and been born in the first place. There's no need to be concerned. Self-hatred is insane.

 You try to assimilate the immigrant, but if it works, you start hating them, and need new foreigners. Who you hate, just like the last foreigners, because they're different. Do you learn nothing? Do you do it precisely because you hate it? Likely, both, if self-hatred has driven you truly mad. 

 The self-hater looks at the world through the haze of hatred they create around themselves. Naturally, they hate everything they see.
 This is what they want. All these awful things clearly exist to punish the atrocious one they hate the most - themselves. 

 Because self-hatred is insane and unsustainable, it violently conflicts with Darwin. Automatically selects against itself. Which conflicts with the insanity of self-hatred, trying to preserve self-destruction. Result: "The spirit is willing (to self-annihiliate) but the flesh is weak." Humans get shackled by Darwinian impulses, which force them to behave in a minimally viable way. 

 Humans hate each other, but have sex anyway. They hate the resulting kids, but they keep having sex anyway. They hate the resulting kids, but they feed them anyway. They defend them against maiming anyway. The flesh forces them to, since any subspecies that didn't enslave the members this way has long ago been properly annihilated. The desire for the physical to converge on the spiritual in this field is constantly thwarted, because its success is self-defeating. If there are no mortals to act as containers for the debris, new mortals must arise to form containers for the debris.
 By their mere existence, mortals run up karmic debts. However, by ceasing to exist, they also run up karmic debts. Paradox. Madness.

Movies are Weapons

 The point of a movie is to maim the viewer. Insofar as they're entertaining, it's only because they can't force you to watch the movie, so they need to trick you. This is why movies are generally bad. They're exactly as bad as the execs think they can get away with.

 Making a good movie is not especially difficult. There's numerous way to check if the movie will be good and to correct course until it is. The problem is making a bad movie that feels good. Tricky, as I'm sure you can imagine. They're highly conscientious about never accidentally making a movie that feels good and is, and consequently there's a lot of stinkers. Accidentally making weapons that feel like they cause damage. 

  

 I used to think studios were incompetent. The bad movies are such obvious bad ideas that professionals should see the failure a mile away. Surely there must be a market opportunity for a studio head who isn't an idiot and greenlights good ideas instead of bad ones...
 Well, no. That's not the point of the industry.

If You Renounce Humanity, is the Curse of Adam Revoked?

 I'm not a journalist and Betteridge's law doesn't apply to me.

 If certain vague and informal actions count, I renounced my humanity a long time ago. 

 Does the curse of adam apply to me?

 "Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat of it all the days of your life."
 "By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food"

 I eat though I don't work.

 "It will produce thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the plants of the field."

 For one, I eat a lot of meat. For two, no, I find the ground produces generally flowers and stuff, not thorns. Even if they are thistles, thistle blooms have a lovely violet colour. Clouds and the sky are great. Rocks too. Nothing anywhere nearby is thorny. All fully blessed, actually, thanks all the same.

 "until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return."

 Can we safely assume I was not dust, and to dust and the ground I will not return? 🤔 It would be weirdly inconsistent if this part was not contradicted by empirical Reality. 

 By now I have formally and intentionally renounced humanity. I want nothing to do with it. I disavow any connection to Caino masochiens beyond the coincidental. In all ways, means, and forms, I separate myself from humanity. All human behaviours have ceased, or will cease as soon as I notice they are human. Everything human is foreign to me.
 If interesting, in a fascinating train-crash sort of way.

 The curse of adam hasn't hitched or hiccuped. Still wholly doesn't apply to me. I do not behave as a human, and consequently do not suffer the human results. It's only the artificial that causes me issues. I have a hate-hate relationship with bricks, concrete, and blacktop. Cursed are the fruits of self-hating Cain.

Empirical Implications of Made In The Image

 If you're made in the image of god, you can demonstrate this by displaying your divine powers. 

 Conversely, if you cannot show any sacred abilities, you can't have been made in a divine image, and can't possibly be human. 

 Beliefs have consequences. It's not merely a statement of social status. It has physical implications and constitutes a test.

 That or the bible is a crock of shit. Either or. A belief without consequences is not a belief. Normally we call it a [lie] as the one professing it doesn't have any faith in it.
 

 More consequences: if anyone genuinely believed in the bible I would not be the first one to think of using its statements as a test. That or I just demonstrated my unique divine powers. Either or. 

 Indeed, I'm only the first to put it into words. "Humans are divine because they have hands." Apes, whoops. "Humans are divine because they have language." Whoops, sign language apes. Whoops, crows. "Humans are divine because they have technology." Whoops, ants. Whoops, the octopus. Whoops, AI. Whoops. Whoops.
 P.S. Seculars and atheists are profoundly christian and can't stop obsessing with christian obsessions which come straight from the bibble's drivel.

Americans Can't Wake Up Because They're Only Pretending to be Asleep

 All of your reasonable options for products and services use the money you give them to murder everything you love! BB on point, as always.
https://twitter.com/ItIsHoeMath/status/1760316549137629382

 Hoe math says many true things, but do always remember it's merely a subtler form of narcissism. Yes, it is excuses and cope. 

With no apologies to the babylon bee:

*Instead of Twitter.
    Use nitter. Adblock is also sufficient, if the goal is merely to withdraw support.
*Instead of brewing your coffee with Starbucks beans:
    Drink tea. Decaf, specifically.
*Instead of Levis:
    It is very reasonable to sew your own clothes. Cloth is dirt cheap. They will also fit better. What do the Amish do for pants? Buy used. Though none of this is particularly important or necessary.
*Instead of Gilette razors:
    Get a straight razor from the nearest blacksmith.
*Instead of Microsoft:
    Software piracy.
*Instead of subscribing to Disney+:
    Software piracy. Also why are you using the plus.
*Instead of buying books from Amazon:
    Software piracy. E.g. libgen. Can also just use the regular-ass library.
*Instead of buying Nike shoes:
    Neither important nor necessary. Buy quality shoes instead of overpriced trash? Ask the Amish what they do for shoes?
*Instead of watching Netflix
    Software piracy. There's nothing good on netflix anyway, you're not missing out.
*Instead of Facebook:
    Try meeting IRL? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I heard most folk have phones these days, have you tried using, like, a phone number to talk to them?

 

 Don't forget you can neuter the Fed's influence over your life, and thus the majority of USG's ability to tax you, by selling all your dollars and dollar-equivalent securities. Likewise using corporate shenanigans it's very possible to near-zero your tax bill, though it is important to be cost-effective and sometimes it isn't worth your time. 

 

 Mafias buy off police forces all the time. So form a mafia already. "But that's immoral." Is letting the police defend criminals from you more moral? Quit the sanctimony and secure your shit.
 Buying pants and shoes from megacorporations isn't even ritually impure under present conditions, never mind a genuine pragmatic problem. First, try not lying to your husband every day. Stop adulterating the sacred body with caffeine. Beam, motes, etc.

 Utopians aren't as stupid as they pretend. They do in fact already know that the world is neither perfect nor perfectible. You can't wake up someone pretending to be asleep. 

 At some point, after offering enough reasonable solutions and none of them are taken, you realize you were being disrespectful. You're offending them because you're revealing you think they're stupid. They're fully capable of coming up with these things on their own. The solutions look simple and obvious because they are simple and obvious.
 Utopians don't do them because they don't want [[solutions]]. They like tyranny. The oppression is the point. Demand for the profane is high. Demand for the holy is negligible.

 Utopians are dystopians. Everything is working as intended: they are receiving the dystopia they demand and deserve. 

 Civilizations do not rise like bread. They bloat like drowned corpses. If you're lucky, it's like the swelling around a broken bone - but it doesn't go down when the bone heals, it goes necrotic and the leg falls off.

 Americans could have already started their youtube-distributed netflix alternative. You could pay some local theatre retards to tell and film whatever story you want. If it was in demand, there would already be channels like this. You would of course watch this on invidious.
 If Americans demanded morality tales which differed noticeably from netflix screeching, they would already have them.
 The real sin is demanding morality tales at all, as I'm sure you already realized. 

 I really would form my own mafia if my countrymen weren't all red-blooded Communists who would instantaneously report me to the secret police. It's not merely that the cops defend the criminals from me - it's that the alleged "dissidents" also defend the criminals (and cops, but I repeat myself) from me.

 However, I'm not a narcissist-utopian, so I have no need for their help to defend myself. My shit is secured, regardless of their strenuous efforts. I typically use manipulation, so they aren't capable of conceiving of my fences, even when staring right at them. Crime is very much a [you] problem. Git gud scrub. Skill issue.

 Revenge is Sour: if my countrymen weren't red-blooded Communists, I would have no need to form a mafia to defend myself against the police.
 Likewise, since I'm not a Communist, I am quite capable of defending myself against the police without a mafia. Whoops.

 Hoe math thinks reconquista [new world edition!] is necessary because he doesn't want to succeed. His impossible task looks less impossible than usual because the previous editions of excuse-impossible_task have reached their sell-by date. At some point the lies even make the liars feel stupid, and they need new duds. 

 Recall the Homestuck principle. All sorts of things are available, but only one goes viral. Hoe math went viral because he's defence against change, exactly because he isn't offering anything ideologically different.

 Hoe math wants to seize Satan's throne because he wants to be Satan. "But if we let too many illegals in, they will kill me, and then how will I continue to suffer?"
 This is almost certainly what's going on with Bukele too, by the way. Yes, it is accidentally useful for the few non-self-hating mortals. Mainly, the murder rate was so high that too many were escaping the vale of tears instead of continuing in torment. The suffering he prevented will be made up in other ways - one way or another.

 Love has no place here.

Does Alex Jones Deserve Infowars?

 If alex jones built infowars, he can build it again. Start warinfos. Can build it way better the second time around.  Yes it's inconvenient and hardly necessary, but did you expect to engage in war without losses, lol? 

 Meanwhile, those who steal whatever money they can will find it squandered by infighting. They'll squabble so much over who gets it they will cost themselves more than they gained.

 Why didn't jones secure his money against his sworn enemy, kek?
 The leopards-eating-faces party vs. the I-can't-believe-satan-lied-about-me party.
 Who could possibly have expected an honourless craven to use falsehoods in an information war? 

 God helps those who help themselves, and, conversely, of those who expect god to do all the work for them... "But I'm on your side-" gonna put your money where your mouth is, or is that all talk? 

Again, All Women are Cheating

 Women have two fixed action patterns. Two ways to live their life. Wife, prostitute.

 All women are married to the government. If she's having sex with you, she's cheating on the government. If she isn't a nun, then she's in an open relationship.
 This is necessary because the government doesn't have a penis and can't satisfy her in bed. (Or at best doesn't have nearly enough penises for all the women it is married to.)

 "Marriage" at church or whatever  is renting her from the government, in a wife-swap style arrangement. If she gets bored she goes back to her legal partner. 

 Naturally, you can't have a stable relationship with an adulteress. Fixed action pattern: the longer she cheats with you, the more worried she is about her "real" husband coming home and catching her. There's no fixed action pattern for [open relationship], so it defaults to something that exists.
 This is big reason women do the [mystery zone] thing during the ""dating"" thing, demanding that you read her mind. If you can't guess that she wants to adulterate with you, she can go back to her husband, now can't she? Likewise if she has to spell it out, she risks you blurting something out in a sensitive situation, now doesn't she? The fact she can call on hubby government to beat up someone trying to 'take advantage' of her, having it both ways, is merely a bonus. If she didn't feel like she was cheating, plausible deniability wouldn't be particularly important. When prince charming physically sweeps the disney princess off her feet, nobody has illusions about what causing her to go horizontal is implying, but she doesn't mind because prince=government=real husband. The covert behaviour [[mysteriously]] vanishes.
 Cheating is naturally very exciting, and women approve of a society that permits and encourages them to [[cheat]] on their [[husband]] at every turn. The fact her "real" husband barely pays attention to her drives her batshit crazy (that and everything else) but they don't put 2 and 2 together. Or perhaps they do put 2 and 2 together, and it lets her viciously punish the person she hates the most: herself.

 Alternatively, she can disavow the government and be a prostitute. Support herself using the only service a woman can provide that's worth more on the market than it costs to produce. You can't have a stable relationship with a prostitute. Someone else will bid more at some point.
 It's also very expensive. If she's living at her parent's house and having sex with you, she believes she is your prostitute. Unless very stupid, she will be high-maintenance, as the tricks she turns 20-35 have to support her financially from 35-80 or whatever. Every year of a prostitute's time costs three years of her living expenses, plus any luxuries she can pull.

 Likewise, it doesn't make sense to shame a woman for being a slut. If a woman is having sex at all, she is a slut. Cheating on her husband (the government). Ran away from home (legalized behaviour) to work the streets.
 It is said that men can't stop having sex, because clown world opposite day. It's women who are addicted to sex and are changed by virginity and can't handle dry spells. If you think nuns aren't having sex it's because they git gud at hiding it.

 Rarely you find even-crazier-than-normal women who don't realize they are married to the government. If you are extremely lucky, their delusions can work out in your favour. E.g. they may falsely believe they will be socially or spiritually censured for divorcing you.

 

 This is related to the fact that tyranny/democracy inherently enslaves all the residents of its jurisdiction. Wife is, of course, a kind of slave. As is a daughter. Consequently, if you enslave a woman, she will treat you like her husband. The correct term for an unowned woman is [feral], like a dog that has learned to flee at the sight/smell of a human.