Predictive God Taking Responsibility For Women

https://youtu.be/pp0E1gb80WQ?t=4756
(timestamp late)
 
 First time I've heard a good explanation of the yeshuan self-sacrifice. Even so, he phrases it wrong.

 God punishes himself for failing to foresee eve would kill the dog. For failing to prevent it, for failing to protect the dog.

 Here's a time the leftists aren't totally wrong.* When you're dealing with God, there's a power imbalance. You can't do anything, anything at all, unless he gives you permission. All responsibility percolates to God, regardless of what you do or how you do it. 

 Then jiang says, "She will feel so much remorse she will never doubt God again." This is cluster B. If God punishes himself because it was his own fault, then eve's remorse or lack thereof is irrelevant. Why should she feel remorse for something she didn't cause? The thing she learns, via role model, is to punish herself if she messes up. Should she ever have the opportunity to make a decision in the first place.

 In this particular example, God should have explained himself better. She did it because she didn't understand, but let's really go out on a limb here and suggest that God has transcendent, incomprehensibly good teaching skills. Glorious and divine, you might say. If eve didn't understand it's because God didn't use these skills.
 Jiang is ontologically committed to the idea that God can't teach. This is atheism: denying the divinity of the divine. I use the term yaleism for jiang's particular species of atheism. 

 For completeness, I will also mention that God could have fenced the dog away. Perhaps given eve a fake toy dog, so she could be tricked into thinking she killed it. Teaching doesn't have to come in the form of words - and if I can think of that, a fortiori God can think of it. There are numerous ways to demonstrate harm is harmful without permitting any harm to genuinely occur.

 

 The dog that didn't bark: why does God have to create someone as twisted as eve in the first place? "No God, infinite love isn't enough for me. I need more than that." Holy shit woman what is wrong with you. Let's explicit say the word Envy here; when it isn't enough that you have enough, when it is only enough that others are deprived.
 I believe nobody tries to explain why such creation is necessary because you can't even pretend there's a justification. It occurs to me that this is the problem, so, what, am I the smartest sapient text box that ever lived; or did it a fortiori occur to all the geniuses before me, they merely hope it doesn't occur to you?

 Unless, inevitably, euhemerism. If there is no god here, but only distinctly incomplete mortals, then it makes sense when god dad screws up. However, also, god dad doesn't have infinite love &c...

 

 Socrates was the only wizard who was willing to say [I don't know], which is why, and why we know, he is the only virtuous wizard recorded in history. That's all they had to do. Say, yeah this is a problem and we don't know why it had to be created this way. They're incomprehensibly evil if they can't say [I don't know] and they're incomprehensibly evil if they did know.
 Holy shit you [wise] elders, what the fuck is wrong with you. If you were trying to be as evil as it is possible to be, well, congratulations. You win.

 A fortiori, the godel incompleteness theorem. "We don't know because we do know we can't know." Not [know], it's a [no].
 No.
 Not at all.
 You don't know not because Reality is incomplete but because you are incomplete. We add Pride to the list next to Envy. 

 

 The fact jiang uses eve, a woman, in his example, is not a coincidence. If women are doing something, it is because men are allowing her to do it. Women, fundamentally, cannot cause soycial problems without men's explicit written permission. Blaming them for anything is genuinely retarded.

 Hunter-gatherers beat their women, but this is largely for the woman's sexual pleasure. If you're doing it for punishment you're a degenerate coward. If she does something you don't like, find the man that told her to and punch him instead. Beat him, shun him, outlaw him. If you don't, then anything else you do constitutes consent to her misbehaviour.

 

 *P.S. This can only happen because rightoids are a kind of leftist. During left-on-left violence, sometimes the left can win.

P.P.S. Jiang claims you have to learn for yourself and not follow a priest or prophet. He does not explain, because the reason is omnievil, Romans 3:10, which is heresy against yaleism. "Everyone is evil so obey the priests." "The priest is also cursed, I mean, evil." "That's bad." "Yes, the blind leading the blind." Mortals maintain their divine spark specifically so they may do the opposite of what it says, priests and jesuses included.

Genetic Jigsaw Metaphor

 A lot of human genes work like puzzle pieces. Imagine a four-piece puzzle. If you have all four pieces, they work together. If you have a different set of four pieces, they also work together. If you mix and match, they won't instantly kill you, but it won't work. If you get a mutation in any of the four pieces, it breaks the whole system, which explains the high level of runts in caino masochiens.

 E.g. cold tolerance and low-light tolerance can be inherited separately, but cold tolerance and bright-light tolerance can't be used simultaneously, nor can heat and dark tolerance.
 E.g. high confidence and high ability can be inherited separately.
 E.g. orientals work well on high carb (particularly rice) diets, whereas european pastoralists need lots of red meat and milk. What if you inherit the need for both, due to miscegenation? You have the need for idiosyncratic microvitamins from both sets...but good luck, your stomach physically isn't big enough to satisfy both appetites.

 In particular, caino masochiens jumps to conclusions in a way that would be perfectly healthy with IQs around 160. All the untrained intellectual reflexes work well, assuming the 0.01% used to be the 50%, under which conditions they evolved.

 A bastard is a bastard because he has the ambition of a duke with the abilities of a swineherd. (william of orange.) Ultra cringe. A fop is a man with the attitude of a dockworker and the abilities of a kaiser. "I want to bang a prostitute, like me mam." Gee whiz, he can really afford a lot of prostitutes. Good, uh, work. I guess.

 Aristocrats have to be careful about breeding with other aristocrats, never mind the lower classes.
 E.g. the genes of a purebred horse archer don't go well with a purebred scholar. You can't throw a harness on the wisdom of the ages. The scrolls and codecies don't need brushing. What if you need fresh air and deep reading at the same time, in a windy region? Hwoops.

 By (low) chance, children of peasants can reassemble a noble genome from fragmentary inclusions. However, the child will carry lots of recessive peasant genes, so the grandchilren will see rapid downward mobility. If they marry another peasant (bill gates) it will guarantee mediocre scions. If they marry a noble (no known examples) it will pollute the noble's house.

 There is a division between jumbled-up aristocrats and purebred peasantry. Since both are basically incompetent, I wonder how distinguishable they are in practice. Probably can't eyeball it.

 Maybe the shuffled aristos are crazier? More bastardy, in contrast to content, humble peasants? You don't hear much from peasants who vibe well with the peasant life, because they aren't literate. Don't show up in books or on twitter. When you push them, they don't push back, they congenially move. 30% of american adults don't even |have| facebook. How many use facebook only to say happy birthday and wow that's a nice picture?

 P.S. Fun fact: a facebook subscription costs $70 a year. If it's not worth significantly more than $70 to you, it's a net loss to society. Dead weight.

Bears, Illustrating Womanism

 Women like danger. They chose the bear precisely because they know it's more dangerous.
 They're mad at white men for not raping and murdering women more often. (Especially that cucking funt who showed up at the party with the same dress. AFTER the woman herself arrived, I might add. Murder the shit out of that one. That would be hot. Or her mom.) Fuck peace! Or rather, peace makes them not want to fuck. What kind of misogynist asshole made cities peaceful? The guy who outlawed domestic violence was worse than hitler, even mythological hitler.

 The bear thing would be an example of women displaying desire by complaining about what they want. If she already had a bearfriend we would call it humblebragging. "I'm so tired. My boyfriend bearly lets me sleep!" Yeah yeah of course you hate being irresistable and satisfied, you poor baby. "My boyfriend hand me a pile of money and tells me to sort it out myself, cryface, I can't bear it." Absolutely unsupervised free-money shopping sprees are the worst, how could you possibly cope.

 Quick reminder: all women are morons. They have mild down's syndrome on account of their oversupply of chromosome X. One X is plenty for men, meaning a double dose is too strong. Men can manipulate women, but women can only manipulate men if he helps.

 Although women are shockingly clumsy and socially awkward, even they know the bear is more dangerous. Men are supposed to know she knows, and work out what her girl logic could possibly mean. Unfortunately, sometimes women really will try to pet wild bears if nobody restrains them...decisively muddies the issue...
 If men were genuinely more dangerous than bears it would be a straight compliment. Humblebragging about her violent bearfriend. By process of elimination, it is indeed a complaint.

 Women think male socialization works like female socialization. Female socialization is all about sussing out what she is being told to do, so she can do it. And blame being told to do it if it goes wrong - naturally, no woman is an adult capable of responsibility or even discernment.

 E.g. "All women are whores." Men read this as a complaint, as a call for women to do better. Women read it as a social role they're supposed to fulfill. "Women are whores. I'm a woman. I'm supposed to be a whore. If I'm not a whore I'm not a woman."

 After women see stuff like [all women are whores] they turn around and do it back. "All men are rapists." You're supposed to read that as: "I'm a man. If I want to man properly, I should rape her."
 Obviously she can't openly ask to be raped. If she consents, it's not rape. She has to [[scheme]], she has to [[manipulate]]. Morons.

 "I choose the bear." I.e. you should be more like the bear. See woman, chase woman, try to [eat] woman. Get it?

 Bears repeating: women complain about rape because she wants you to rape her. Of course, if you do everything the woman complains about, she'll hate that too. It's the double X down's syndrome again. It's best for normies to totally ignore what women say - entire ignore, completely ignore, treat it like a yapping dog - and simply do whatever he thinks is best a priori. Women can't into incentives.

 Get that too? Women can't do anything to affect the world except complain, then turn around and deliberately make more than half their complaints fake and untrustworthy. (Of course [and gay], it goes without saying, women are gay. They like dick; never beating that charge.)

 If you're bright and bored I suppose you can kill some time trying to suss out which complaints are real and which are clown girl backwards day. You have my permission. Women spend all their limited cognitive resources ensuring the puzzles are as ambiguous as possible, maximizing the failure rate, so they are indeed challenging.

Hollow World

https://www.royalroad.com/fiction/15193/ave-xia-rem-y/chapter/2788148/chapter-336-if-all-else

 Yes, exactly. If the world is hollow, that means you can put things in it.

 If you did not want things, you wouldn't mind the world being empty and meaningless. You want things.

 Because the world is empty and meaningless, it cannot stop you. What is truly in your way? Nothing. Nothing at all. You can put anything you want there.

Truth of Ragnarok

 The Sun also rises.
What goes up must come down.

All life and all divinity must perish, as even the Cosmos must sleep. It can't remain awake forever, it must awake anew.