The inventor of the bikini had to hire prostitutes to model the thing for advertisements.
It is still true that only a whore will willingly wear a bikini. Even leotards are over the line, though at least the line remains within the margin of error.
All hail the 13-year-old gaze, I suppose. Must have the Freedom to look at everything they want to look at.
4 comments:
>only a whore will willingly wear a bikini.
The future belongs to those who breed children for it. If you hold up an ideal of chastity, but you are the only one who follows it, that ideal will become an abstraction and will probably be forgotten.
If you can breed a bunch of kids -- or if you can be the celibate leader of a community that breeds above replacement level -- then you can set standards for respectable sexuality that the community can follow. If you're not breeding above replacement level, it is unlikely anyone will remember your standards of modesty after you are dead.
It's not an ideal, it's a fact. If you wear a bikini, you are a whore.
If you dance with a whore, expect her loyalty to last exactly as long as the money does. Because prostitution.
>If you're not breeding above replacement level, it is unlikely anyone will remember your standards of modesty after you are dead.
"... but the many are sated like cattle."
whoredom is about inability to do math / set coherent objectives
chastity is about following rules
whoredom and chastity are not fundamentally opposed. we have lots of chaste whores today. there's even a word in the popular lexicon for it these days: "involuntarily celibate"
the future belongs to those who can control it today. "first you must make a bunch of other people that will follow you, or otherwise make a bunch of people follow you" are you going to to be able to make decisions de novo after those people appear? or before?
if after, how would their appearance help with such a thing?
if before, why focus these details?
Post a Comment