https://nitter.unixfox.eu/TheMcMullan/status/1689916568086757376
He says a lot of words. All of them are true as far as they go.
The profound problem is that the host is dishonestly not using the term 'liar' for the liar.
Liars don't go inside, next to the fire. They go outside the wall. Load her up into the trebuchet and toss her out with the rest of the trash.
Also, look for the moron who let someone in without making them prove themselves. Why did you trust a stranger? What's wrong with you? Can you not even rise to the standard of the peasant villager?
Science proceeds from replication. The idea that this woman cares about slavery has not replicated. She needs to prove herself - and she won't be able to, since it's not true. She doesn't care about "pain" or whatever. She's just a liar.
Do replication => TV, not TV => check for replication. This should be debate 101, not rocket surgery.
If you don't let liars sit next to the fire, you don't have to worry about meticulously building up resistance to every nuance of each individual form of lie.
"Uproven - disregard." Quick, easy, just do it.
Although just as Plato suggests Philosophy is the foundation of life, I do suggest paying some anti-liar specialists. Keep 'em on retainer, for lots of reasons. Call 'em the Inquisition, because there's no point to mincing words about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment