Mortals vs. Logical Argument

 Arguing with a mortal is foolish at best. Do they even know what words mean? Can they do anything except what their lord or master tells them to do? You can't learn anything from them because they don't know anything, they can't learn anything from you because they're nonverbal, and even if they did learn something they would be unable to act on it.

 Some mortals might rise above, but then they're leftists. They do understand words, but they don't like them. They use fake words, because [fuck you dad]. The leftist evaluates arguments entirely based on what actions it justifies. Who cares if the argument is true, or even makes sense? They may understand some words, but words like [consistency] and [hypocrisy] are beyond them. Why go to all the effort to figure them out? It only restricts what actions they can justify.

 Did you notice how farcical this is? Nobody cares about the justifications, yet they mass-produce justifications anyway. If this isn't a colossal waste of time and effort, it's extremely well hidden. The only thing worse is trying to argue a leftist out of the fake justifications they don't care about or even care to understand.
 
 If you truly dunk on a leftist, utterly laying waste to their argument, their poolitical calculus doesn't change. They pick a new fake justification then do what they were going to do anyway.

 Before you argue with a poolitician, you first have to demand they prove they care about arguments. And you don't have to do that either, because if they cared about logic or the Truth they wouldn't be a poolitician or anywhere near poolitics.

 

 It's worse than a waste of time. When a leftoid spams their justification, they're telling you what they plan to do. If you wish to oppose them, you know where you need to stand and what tools you'll need while you're standing there.

 Argument is not one of the tools. Rhetoric only works when an authority deliberately grants favours to approved kinds of rhetoric. Nothing more than an orthodoxy shit test.

 Rightoids can't defeat leftoids only and solely because they don't want to. Normie sadomasochism. As with the leftoids, the justifications come second. Losing was the point, and if you make it difficult for them to lose, that only means they'll try harder and justify more cleverly until they lose as intended.

 

 Taxation is treason. Normies have declared war on you (and on each other). Declare war on them, or be a cuck. The peace is already suspended, the only question is whether you deliberately enslave yourself or not.

 [[[High-trust]]] is a joke. You're supposed to laugh. The light side is prey. They exist to be scammed and exploited. Being eaten is what they're for. 

Minor: Great Amusment of Moses

 I forgot the name of the habiru. Hopefully that was indeed the name I was looking for... I stumbled upon some prime comedy while I was looking it up.

 "Few people dispute that Moses was a reality in history, whether as an individual or a group of individuals, but there are several perplexing aspects of the man. First, he has an Egyptian name (as do many of his relatives). Second, he seems to spend a large amount of time among a non-Hebrew people, the Midianites, where he marries and seems to learn the Yahweh religion, and some of its cultic practices, from the Midianites." 

 From the horse's mouth: moses was neither genetically nor culturally jewish. Like he was originally named akhenaten or something, and was banished from egypt for some mysterious reason.

 Such strange suppositions. I wonder where they came from? 

 "Exodus claims that a "diverse group of peoples" left Egypt with Moses. Who were these?"

 Truly weird beliefs. I wonder if the account in exodus was deliberately distorted for poolitical reasons, but not competently enough to a) disguise the altered pixels or b) hide the real story from an invested investigator. Like it was done by the god of losers, or suchlike. 

 What an idea. 

 If, for your sins, you are familiar with the modern amarnites, tab over to la wik and ctrl-f amarna. 

The Left vs. Left-less Pendulum

 Proximately your woke videos happened because it was unthinkable to curse out a yale professor when you went.
https://www.youtube.com/embed/hk_yhi3-prw

 If university isn't supposed to be safe, then the profs can curse out the students. If the students can't cuss out the professors in return, then they will poolitically agitate to reverse that situation. "Let the low places be raised, and the hills brought down." And lo, it was so. Revolution, one pi, 180 degrees! Now students can refer to professors, to their faces, as coarsely as they like, while the profs have to walk on eggshells.

 Kto kogo. Who, whom.

 There was always a whom. The question is merely who shall have the [doing unto].

 Being explicit: if nobody can curse anyone out, or everyone can curse everyone out, like they're all adults or something outrageous like that, it's stable. You don't get this oscillating pendulum.

 Aside: I would also like to surface the idea of strangers vs. friendlies. If the students are guests of the university then they need to have guest rights and guest obligations. If they are not guests then they can't be strangers. They should live at the university, not for 4 years, but for the foreseeable future. This bizarre play-pretend hybrid is illness.

 

 Likewise, marriage was outlawed because fornication was outlawed. The way to legalize fornication was to destroy the legality of the family. Drugs get outlawed to get around the inability to prosecute drug addicts for crime.  

 

 Ultimately, fornication was outlawed in the first place precisely because such a law is unjust. Students were forbidden from cussing out their profs precisely because unearned respect is unjust. 

 The purpose of these institutions is to farm injustice. They are merely changing the colours of the injustice. Who, whom. 

 Ultimately, Karma has some words to say about this. Which is why universities are failling. Which is why !!america!! is failing.

 

 Ascended aside: p.history draws the connection between bureaucracy and anarcho-tyranny. They attack the law-abiding because criminals are scawwy but attacking either seemingly justify their fake jobs.

 Doesn't draw the connection with irresponsibility and lack of discipline, however. Bureaucracies don't go like this when they have to spend their own money.
 If the market didn't demand injustice, injustice would not be supplied. E.g. students would stop attending bureaucratized universities. I would personally start a [consumer reports]-style magazine to let students know how badly the universities were corrupting themselves, and I would make bank letting them avoid the bad ones.
 Instead, working as intended. The magazine is redundant; the students already know. They merely like the corruption. 

 In a sense, it is true: Revolution is the result of injustice. Except the point isn't to correct the injustice, it's about having a turn, pun intended. "You got to oppress last time! It's my go!"
 In a society, as opposed to a soyciety, you don't get Revolution. That's the purpose of lionizing property rights. No kto, no kogo, no Revolution. If it were legal to try Capitalism for the first time, I would do that instead of the magazine. Or rather, it would be redundant, because personnel is policy. If there were non-negligible demand for justice, it would already be legal, and Capitalism already tried. I would already be living there. 

 Anyone who desires justice doesn't need to convince the mortals to permit it. They only need to convince Karma that they truly desire justice. Rather than doing dumb things like blogging, you should exploit the mortals. They like being exploited anyway. Trade tips on how to hack their intentionally broken systems for your own personal enrichment; either without being caught or without the mortals noticing anything wrong at all.

Minor: Scion's Shadowen

 I mistakenly attributed it to wishsong. The names are still atrocious, but anyway it's the dreams in scion of shannara.

 

Humans wandered the ashen devastation in packs, more animals than men. They rent and tore at each other; they howled and shrieked. Dark shapes flitted among them, shadows that lacked substance yet had eyes of fire. The shadows moved through the humans, joining with them, becoming them, leaving them again. They moved in a dance that was macabre, yet purposeful. The shadows were devouring the humans, he saw. The shadows were feeding on them.

The vision shifted. He saw himself then, a skeletal, ragged beggar facing a cauldron of strange white fire that bubbled and swirled and whispered his name. Vapors lifted from the cauldron and snaked their way down to where he stood, wrapping about him, caressing him as if he were their child. Shadows flitted all about, passing by at first, then entering him as if he were a hollow casing in which they might play as they chose. He could feel their touch; he wanted to scream.



And abruptly Par found himself recalling the dreams that Allanon had sent, the visions of a nightmarish world in which everything was blackened and withered and life was reduced to something barely recognizable. Reddened eyes blinked like bits of fire, and shadow forms flitted through a haze of ash and smoke.

 

 (Par ultimately found his bosom companions; eagle, birdie, hole-in-one, poached, and stir-fry. The cooking is bad though; his brother is named colic, or coll for short. Don't worry, the two passages above are by far the best part of the whole series.) 

Examples of Definition Success

 Bro did some set 0s.

https://theanti-puritan.blogspot.com/2025/10/no-magical-third-categories.html

 It's not how I would define [concentration camp], but the definitions are perfectly valid. He illustrates how the handles fit together neatly with no gaps. He successfully implies that trying to put new handles crosswise would only stop you from grasping the existing handles. 

 Using this system, I would say hitler didn't run any concentration camps, only prisons. As far as I know, likewise the gulags and FDR's japanese camps were prisons. The gulags would kill you sometimes, but mainly when stalin had it out for you personally. Individual special cases.

Gender War as Cope

 So-called men are subconsciously aware they're not good enough for marriage.
The whores who demand to be called women are aware they're not marriageable.

 However, if the whores can blame the gay boys, and the gay boys can blame the whores, they can distract themselves from their painful self-awareness. "There's no good men." Thus no reason for me to stop being bad, she doesn't say.
 Commoners always cast blame for the purpose of justifying the inaction they were doomed to anyway.
The universal commoner cope is the claim they're not commoners, incapable of action.

 At an intermediate level we can blame the government. The whores and boys are doing what they're told. "But I wanted to be a whore like I was  told, and be marriageable!" Sure, and I want to find a dozen fully armed, staffed, and loyal nuclear ICBM silos in my back yard, but that's not how that works.

 However, this reflects back on the voters. You can in fact simply disengage from the government. "You want me to be a what now? Ah, you're my enemy, I see." Instead, this is consensual non-con. Demand for oppression, demand for tyranny. When the boys and their whores complain about the [dating market] the insult is backhanded. They're letting the government know the oppression is working and they should keep doing it. They can't openly approve because it's supposed to be non-con. Would break the roleplay.       

 The important part is to make sure it really is hurting them, and not some kind of masochistic pleasure. It's important that they pay off their  karma so they can go properly extinct, lightly for their sake and mainly for your own. If it's not hurting them, it's time for non-consensual non-con. Tyrannize them openly.

 

 My belief: during the low tech times, many souls arrived on Earth with karma so bad they couldn't live past infancy. Couldn't pay off any of  their debt. Technology had to be forcibly raised so that it could prop up their weak existence, that they might live long enough to suffer.

 A big backlog developed. Unjustly low depravity had to be balanced by today's concentrated depravity.

 However, it turns out they didn't need to live long. Perhaps they suffered so tremendously during their brief tenure that it didn't take much. Now more souls are being forgiven for existing than are Falling to Earth. As such, birth rates have to come down, and given that, something has to justify the lack of births. 

 One of those things is lack of sex. Not coincidentally, these mutant souls which can't survive childhood also can't find a mate. Mortals adjust their standards based on their own position, but there is a floor. The standards can only be adjusted so low.

 That is: birth rates below 0.75 would be a good thing, that is, unless you want to maximize suffering, despair, and failure. Not forgetting that caring at all about how a bunch of strangers feel is a serious mental illness.

 Alternatively there was a war in heaven, which means lots of dead immortals, which means lots of bonus mortal souls. It would require more epicycles but it's not impossible.

Soyciety Neither Deserves Nor Wants Saving

  Western culture doesn't stop at trying to make you a narcissist, nor merely aiding and abetting narcissistic violations, it is itself a narcissist. Grandiose, I think.

 Western culture tries to gaslight you about western culture. That's what virtue-signalling is. It tries to secure narcissistic supply, in the form of letting its agents make you bow to its delusions.

 Western culture isn't mistaken or even truly deluded. It isn't a little oopsie, and it isn't hallucinating. It is lying, and getting you to assent to the lie is point. They say Soviet Communists made you assent to a lie to humiliate you, but the west makes you assent to a lie to make you assent to a lie. That's the end goal. The purpose of Western cuture is to mendaciously prevaricate.

 Ultimately all narcissists hate themselves. That's your ethno-masochism. It has to come out somehow. Western culture cuts itself.

 It goes further, it says you can help it cut itself, taking revenge for all the abuse, provided you also cut yourself.

 Satan giving you permission to punch him in the face provided you wear a brass knuckle with inward-facing spikes. That's how a deal with the devil works. "If I can stab your back, you can stab mine." Can't you hear it? When you "scratch" someone's back, it doesn't sound like you're being kind. Cue midwit meme.

 You don't argue with a narcissist. You can't wake up someone pretending to be asleep. Narcissists never agree to treatment, so you never treat a narcissist either. The way to deal with a narcissist is indefinite involuntary hospitalization.
 
 If doing so is currently illegal, then the only solution is [no contact].

 Don't watch the TV, don't watch movies, don't play story-heavy games, don't vote, don't read the newspaper. Sure as fuck don't send your kids to its narcissist schools.
 You have to say the big No. Find a way not to pay taxes.

 Attempting to [save] a narcissist is what they want. Since they're the ones sabotaging themselves, they can play out the game indefinitely. Every time you [save] them from some vice, they create a new one. Gets more attention. The time and effort you spend on western culture distracts it from the overwhelming shame and worthlessness it quite rightly feels. You don't [resist] a narcissist, their power is fake. By resisting you're merely assenting to their delusional frame.

 "But other cultures are even worse." Yes, and isn't that something. That other cultures are worse does not make insanity any healthier.

 Any form of engagement with the narcissist culture is to deny that it is narcissist. It will wrap you into its dynamic. Only in rare cases will it not turn you into a narcissist yourself. The solution is [no contact].

Divinity Ballparking

 You cannot honestly suggest the bibble was written by a god if you have the most vague, remote ideas of what a god is really like.
 It comes from a place of absurd hubris, atheism, or fuckin' lying.

 If a god wrote a book would we be able to understand it? I mean, no, obviously not? Even if they dumbed it way way way down it wouldn't look remotely human. Scholars would not argue if this passage contradicts that one, they would argue what the fuck it's doing in the book at all. "Does...does this follow? Can you even tell if it's true or not?" (It does, you can, it is.)

 A god would make homer look like a child throwing a tantrum while he happened to have paint on his fingers. It makes a picture, you know, sort of. Fingers and paint were involved.

 In the elder scrolls, the eponymous scrolls are left lying around the mortal world, because it's not like mortals can read them. If you stare at one for too long your head blows up. A higher god trying to write for us wouldn't be saying, "Be not afraid," he would be trying to convince the shattered dust that used to be a planet to get its act back together for another tour.

 By higher I mean upper low. A genuine higher god doesn't worry about us looking at him, he worries about him looking at us, since if he moves from glance to stare, everything explodes. Supernovas for everyone. Imagine attention so weighty it causes physical nuclear fusion. Hooray, you discovered element 1000. First synthesis for humanity. It used to be your colon. Your spine became a nucleus of element 496, for reference.
 Luckily they have no reason to care about us in the slightest, any more than you care about specific electrons in a bacteria's cell wall.

 I suppose this has been a rep of set four. Done so many I launch them by accident. Seeped into my bones.
Why do gods seem to have such a vague idea of mortal concerns? Because properly looking at us...would be very painful. For us.