ACAB Falls Short, it's ACAC

 ACAB +1 = ACAC. (44204 in base-10) Let's do all cops are criminals real quick.

 They're playing a twisted and sadistic game of cops and robbers. Literally the childhood game. The cops and the copped are on the same side, that's why the population playing the robber role can never go down.  Cops don't exist to protect the public from criminals. They exist to get paid, and to get paid, they have to protect the criminals from the public, so they can continue playing the game. 

 Bureaucracies exist to grow. Naturally, when the cop shop grows, crime must grow, to supply enough players for the new cops to play against. 

 Naturally, since cops are criminals, when police forces grow, crime goes up. More criminals => more crime. Duh.

Own Markets, not Markets

 https://freenortherner.com/2016/04/10/owned-markets/

The problem with free markets though, is that they are free. Libertarians and conservatives do not take their thoughts as fully forward as they should. We can privatize all the goods and services on the market, but that leaves one question, what of the market itself?

 Ironically this is, of course, Communism. Irresponsible.

 Trying to own the market as a whole is almost exactly like trying to personally own every individual house. Hello world conquest, I hadn't seen you in nearly twenty seconds. Net worth is a genetic trait and nobody has enough to pay for that much stuff, never mind the many many other issues, such as information/communication bandwidth.

 However, it is true that, for example, particular bazaars have a landlord. The stock market should be named after its owner, e.g. Herodotus' Stock Market.

 Despotism always has narcissistic traits. You stop your house from being a commons by putting a fence around it. You don't need anyone else's house. You stop a market from being a commons by putting a fence around it. What happens if you try to put a fence around the entire world? A boundary with everything in it isn't a boundary. The world is round, after all, you don't need to fence the edge to keep morons from falling off. (And shouldn't even if you could.) 

 With a fence around the market you yourself are using, then if you don't like how some other market operates, simply close the fence to that market. In particular, if they are using central-bank counterfeiting, your market should be closed to their money; stop them from using their money on anything of yours, including your own money. As always, the Amish demonstrate you don't need world conquest. You can do cheap security instead of trying step 1) buy everything. 

 If you put a fence around everything, anything you might want to keep out is already on the inside. Defeats the purpose of a fence. The link above is a wordcel way of proposing/enforcing a commons by arguing against tragic commons.

Loserdomain Heroism

 If you can have confidence confidence, do that. 

 This post is for those who can't. 

 Most normies are just normies, and and most losers are just losers. However, a small minority of losers are also heroes. There's a technique and a method, and it's not particularly complicated. You can figure it out from a blog post without having to be coached through all the specific details. 

 The basic property of confidence is believing you're good enough and you can afford it. You can afford to look bad now and again, afford to acknowledge you're wrong, afford to give the other person time to speak, and so on. You don't have to be aggro because nobody can hurt you. That if anyone doesn't like you, it's more them than you, and you can afford to let that relationship go. 

 The basic property of loserdom is knowing you're not good enough. You can't afford to look bad even one time more than absolutely necessary, or everyone will hate you. Und so weiter. You can't get any friends because you can't do anything for them. You can't make it worth their time. 

 You can still have confidence. 

 You can have the confidence that you admitted it. 

 It stings, doesn't it? Perhaps burns like fire? 

 And yet. You admitted it anyway. You might be a loser, but you're tough. You're tough as shit - maybe you didn't have a choice, but nevertheless, you are. Nobody can doubt your courage. Even if they try, they'll just make themselves look stupid, like insulting a basketball player's height. "Bro, what? So, uh, anyway..."

 Of especial interest, you can't afford to admit when you're wrong. Because you're wrong all the time. You should sit down and shut up, loser. Nobody needs to hear what you have to say. 

 The thought sears. It's agony to even consider the possibility. 

 But? Everyone hates you anyway? What do you have to lose? 

 You might be a loser who rightly has no friends, but at least you can admit when you're wrong. You can at least correct yourself. When you can't afford anything else, you can afford principles.

 I mean, can't you? Have you tried it? Again, what do you have to lose? You're a loser. You lost. Surrender. But. At least you will be able to say you have principles. 

 Even losers don't have to lie. Even losers don't have to embarrass themselves fighting losing battles. Normies do - but you don't. Lying won't help anyway. Fighting won't help anyway. Just relax. Take the pitch-black pill. Lose and chill out.

 The confident don't have to be aggro because nobody can take away what they already have.

 The loser doesn't have to be aggro because they have nothing to take away. Nobody can do any damage that hasn't already been done. Embrace the underworld.
 If you must have confidence in your worthlessness, then also have confidence in your courage. Also have confidence in your principles. Nobody is going to listen to you, and that's fine. They weren't going to anyway. If you're useless to them, if you have nothing to offer, might as well think about what they have to offer you. If they're going to look down on you regardless, make them prove they're more useful than you. They're not going to listen to you, so by process of elimination, listen to them. Pretend you're a confident listener so you can steal their knowledge for yourself.

 They're going to think you're wrong anyway, whether you are or not, so let them have the W. Don't take that away from them to no benefit. Might as well make it easy. Alternatively, let them embarrass themselves in their own words. If it works it works, if it doesn't it wasn't meant to be.

 They're not going to look at you or try to understand you or care about you. (This is especially fun when it's your parents at issue.) Which means you can save yourself the effort of trying to get fair treatment. Whelp, that was easy, wasn't it? You can't afford it anyway, but there was never a chance, so you don't have to try.
 If there is any damage that hasn't already been done, pre-emptively protect that part. Obviously they're going to go straight for it if they have the chance, because bullying is what it means to be human. Ensure they don't get the opportunity. Ideally they shouldn't even guess it might be there. Go ahead a blatantly lie if it helps - they weren't going to be honest with you, there's no risk to being dishonest with them. Then, simply let the rest of the ruins be ruins. 

 I mean, what are they gonna do, worst case? Call you a loser? Are they gonna...hate you?
 Um, oh no? How terrible? Next you'll tell me the sun is going to rise tomorrow.

 "You loser, you racist, you incel." 

 "Yes."
 Now what? Admit the truth and they have nothing.
What goes with this? Soychad? Crying chudjak mask over smirking face? 

 Just being a loser doesn't mean you can't also be a hero.

 You understand insulting a loser is a loser move, right? It displays fear. "Yeah I have a micropenis. Yes, my car is compensating for something. And you're afraid of me, lol." Why are you down here bumming it with the losers, normie? kek. Couldn't even find a car to compensate with?
 "I'm so sorry - it seems you think my loserdom isn't obvious and needs to be pointed out. Being so blind must be hard for you."
 "Couldn't find any schoolchildren to bully so you had to resort to finding me, lmao?" You're not a coward, and they definitely are. 

 

 If you refuse to deny it, you strip tremendous power from those who have treated you so badly. If you admit you fucked up, and fucked up all the way, you don't have to put up with anything beyond the wholly inevitable. By taking everything away from you, they have given you almost perfect freedom.

 Just being a loser doesn't mean you can't also be a hero. 

P.S.

 Being a complete loser gives you opportunities normies don't have. It's not merely the opportunity to have principles and to never have to go to the effort of fighting.
 Remember fidget spinners, and how everyone hated them? If you're a pariah, you can force them to go away with some simple reverse psychology. Buy some fidget spinners and loudly praise them to everyone who doesn't escape fast enough. They'll drop it like a hot rock. You can transcend their fear and use it against them.

 Hate onlyfans? Try to rope everyone into your onlyfans fanclub. "I love porn! Woo!" Bam, instant virtue. 

 Spent too much time on 4chan and hate the Jews? Well. You know what to do. 

 Don't forget you can go aggro if you want. I mean...what are they gonna do, call you a loser? It's not up to them. It's not up to me. Do whatever you feel like.

 There's a fun thing you can do, for which I'll use a group TV interview as an example. Say the interviewer is absolutely persecuting you. Find one of the onlookers you particularly hate and rope them into supporting you by assuming the sale. You shouldn't pick the prettiest girl out of resentment, but I'll forgive you if you do.
 "[Interviewer] is being so mean to me! You don't agree that I'm [whatever] do you?" Grab her hands in supplication for bonus effect. This is merely one phrasing of many that works great.
 Yes, she will flinch violently away. This will hurt a lot, but you're way tougher than anyone else in the room. Not even the fifth time this has happened, you can take it.
 They will automatically, reflexively smear her with guilt by association. You can tell for sure precisely because she has to disavow you so frantically. This shit leaks, though. Everyone will associate you and her in their minds from now on.
lol, pwned
totes worth
 They'll probably tease her forever about you being her boyfriend. She'll never live it down. Does she deserve it? Absolutely not. But you can do that to her whenever you want. If they insist on ruining your reputation, remember you can easily take them down with you.
 If you're into that. It won't really help, after all. But it passes the time. 

 Alt: snidely spread rumours that someone you hate is real friendly with you. "Hey uh I missed [X]'s call. Yeah he was helping me with [Y], when you get a chance can you ask him about it?"
 "Get away from me you freak!"
 Of course, he'll deny it, but that won't stop folk from wondering. Even if you've pulled that crap before, they won't be able to help themselves. Might have to get clever with the wording and choose your targets well - I haven't live-tested this sort of thing, merely seen it from a distance. I don't know all the details. 

 If Republicans were serious about smearing Democrats, they would do the stupid ally thing. They would act like a completely stinking racist hayseed, then endorse J'Obiden. Or amplify and agree: "Yeah we should ban divorce for white women as punitive damages for slavery. Hillary for president!"

Neoliberalism is Liberalism is Communism

 The only thing that matters is responsibility vs. irresponsibility. Responsibility is when you pay for your own stuff. Irresponsibility is when someone else ["from each according to their ability"] pays for it. 

 Liberals were just Communists. They were Marxists who believed Capitalism would inevitably decay into Communism, and thus tried to achieve Communism by advocating for policies at one remove. 

 Liberals thought the peasants were so dumb that if given responsibility for their own economic affairs, they would all fuck it up and become wholly reliant on the State. Easy way: they were just lying.

 What actually happened: the peasants were told to go get rich, so they did. Any time the behaviour did not produce riches as ordered, they fixed it.

 Neoliberals are liberals who noticed the liberal Scheme didn't work. Therefore they are more directly implementing irresponsibility. They still use the language of responsible markets, but mean it even less than liberals did. 

 P.S. All taxation is inherently Communist.

Examples of Anti-Government Security

 The Amish show us it hardly matters how corrupt the government is or even how corrupt the voters are, you can simply secure yourself against it. Security is affordable.

 

Problem: copyright law is inherently corrupt.
Solution: software piracy. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Problem: the EEOC is inherently corrupt.
Solution: don't let your corporation grow above 500 employees. E.g. use contractors.

Problem: the SEC is corrupt.
Solution: don't do an IPO. 

 

Problem: the CPS wants to take your kids away.
Solution: lie to the CPS. They are gullible. Ideally ensure they remain in the dark in the first place. They are blind.

 

Problem: welfare state.
Solution: tell unverifiable lies to get the welfare.

 

Problem: central bank counterfeit money.
Solution: own businesses, rent out land, buy bitcoin. 

 

Problem: universities are corrupt, corporations require degrees.
Solution: I already covered this solution.

Problem: the pharma-industrial complex is corrupt.
Solution: don't take the vaccine.

Problem: you might get fired for not taking the vaccine.
Solution: have a backup revenue stream, which you should have anyway. 

Problem: food safety ensures the food is unsafe.
Solution: investigate and verify food nobility yourself. They miss some here and there.

 

Problem: raw milk is illegal.
Solution: buy the house next door to the cow farmer.

 

Problem: Hollywood is Jewish.
Solution: don't watch English TV. Get a youtube account and a camera. Build a local theatre stage.

Problem: conscription.
Solution: Canada, among others.

 

Problem: you don't know whether an agency is corrupt.
Solution: it is.

Problem: cars.
Solution: Amsterdam. Admittedly this solution is particularly imperfect, but it exists.

Problem: street crime.
Solution: crime isn't everywhere, why didn't you choose one of the places it isn't?

Problem: neighbours are all pedophile apologists.
Solution: clean your room.

Problem: black government.
Problem`: unclean room.
Solution: clean your room.

Evil Spirits are Bacteria-Shaped ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 It's the new testament, where evil spirits primarily cause disease and madness...just like the Greeks believed and especially the Semitic peoples.
https://nitter.unixfox.eu/GraniRau/status/1752853502605377880

 Steelman: I still believe mental and physical disease are caused by evil spirits, except it turns out you can kill evil spirits with antibiotics. All hail the sacred penicillin. 

 Glory to the hairy one, praise Eukaryota Fungi Eurotiomycetes Eurotiales Aspergillaceae Penicillium chrysogenum. In thy light we are humbled. The cheese is good too. Thank you. Praise be to Fungi. Praise be to the incomprehensible heavens, for the gift of life and the gift of reason.

 You can question whether the Greeks would have agreed that penicillin is holy, but if they wouldn't, they were wrong. They're ontologically committed to it. There's nothing inherently incorrect about the idea of evil spirits provided you're careful about how you define evil and spirits. ("Spirit" means air or breath so I guess technically only airborne/respiratory infections are evil spirits per se.) 

 Also radiation. Alpha, beta, gamma: all kill evil spirits. It is holy. UV is especially effective against evil spirits outside a host.

 Note that the foul energies get into your body in the first place because you have profaned it. You ate unclean or inglorious food. Mayhap you honoured Great Sol too little.

 Perhaps this is the way to use "sacrifice" correctly: having profaned your body and cultivated an infection, you must sacrifice to become pure again. Either you must sacrifice time and comfort, or you must sacrifice your healthy gut flora to penicillin. You already screwed up too much to do it the easy way.

 Simply praying for the evil spirits to be cast out won't work. If you were in any position to ask the heavens for favours, you wouldn't have become sick in the first place. "I wish I hadn't profaned yourself." Yeah okay, but that already happened. Even the greatest gods can't change the past, for it is contrary to free will.

 What is profanity? It is a prayer asking to be cursed and diseased. You can't immediately turn around and pray for the opposite. Well, you can, but it won't work. This is real simple: imagine praying to your mom to be driven to the toy store, but when you get there, you immediately pray to be driven back. This isn't a valid prayer, this is a shortcut for upsetting your mom. It will be taken as a prayer to have your mom be mad at you and will very likely be answered. The gods have incomprehensible generosity but even they aren't going to look favourably on a prayer asking them to waste their time.

Worst Constantine

 I've never held Constantine killing his son and wife against him because the reason was an incestuous affair between them. Numa would have executed them both by the old religious law too. It was good enough for Numa, it's enough for me.
https://nitter.unixfox.eu/GraniRau/status/1752396987519897716

 Needed to kill himself as well. Brought terrible shame to his family.

 Incest isn't a little oopsie. You can get minor deformities from time to time in even the best families. IQ in particular is always a total crapshoot. Incest is not a minor deformity. This isn't an unfortunately placed cosmic ray, this is a critical fault in the bloodline. This is literally cause to stop worshipping your ancestors, as they can't have been worthy of praise. 

 Likewise, Constantine brought terrible shame upon himself by picking a wife who was into incest. This isn't a subtle personality flaw. This is a whole complex, and it looks disgusting and creepy even to untrained observers. This is picking up a whore from the slums and acting like you're innocent when it turns out she's diseased.

 No wonder Constantine created such a dishonourable religion. Full-blooded child of Satan. Personnel is policy.

Diego Caleiro, Catastrophic Woman Risk, & Arranged Marriages

 My thesis: they're nowhere near understanding how deep the problem is.

 Startlingly readable massive effortpost: https://nitter.unixfox.eu/diegocaleiro/status/1733258469124559103

"Are Modern Women a Global Catastrophic Risk? " &c

 Feminism is really bad for women. They absolutely hate it. Female happiness used to be higher than male happiness, but it's dropped fast and inexorably since the 70s, and now men, although also suffering, are the emotional/feels winners of society.

  Makes sense: feminists are insanely misogynic. Nobody hates a woman as much as another woman, and nobody hates women and femininity as much as a feminist, not even close.

 Caleiro claims that feminism is woman-driven. That's why [women] form the catastrophic risk. If so, it's due to self-hatred. Masochist self-punishment.

 If they really hate themselves that much...well, they would know, wouldn't they? Who knows them better than they themselves do? They, the experts, say they deserve it: believe them. The destruction of their societies and genetic lines is a plain good thing. It's not a risk of catastrophe, it's an overdue correction. 

  If it's not self-imposed it means men imposed it on women. Turns out feminism is exactly patriarchy they hate so much, lol. 

 Quite the horns, no? 

 Caleiro is afflicted with unwarranted mercy. Gave benefit of the doubt to sinners which deserve none. Went all Hanlon's razor, which resulted in a self-contradiction.

 Notice how women acting the way Caleiro gestures toward make you mad? That's because it's evil. Deliberate profanity. It's not an honest confusion or mistake. It feels bad because it is bad, and they sin because they are hatable sinners. Ref: midwit meme. Corroboration: how women feel about themselves both individually and as the group [women].

 I am lightly partial to the patriarchy explanation due to the fact Caleiro seems unaware that marriage has almost always been arranged, and it seems women haven't even tried to manipulate their dads much.

 There's an argument that arranged marriage is still woman-driven because daddy's girl whines until daddy picks a dude she likes, but I haven't seen any evidence this actually happens. 1) Why would (unmarried) women hate arranged marriages so much if they're fundamentally self-driven? It would be responsibility laundering, making it better, not worse. 2) Why do the women hate the men they choose so much? If they have traditionally done any choosing, why are they catastrophically bad at it? 3) With ""love"" marriages* why do women choose such different partners than their father would have chosen? *(Rare pre-1085 Sophism from France, it's courtly love, not love simpliciter.)