Democracy/Fascism is largely about cope for the Envious. However, bystanders get swept up, and also become the enemy of all virtue. Having spent a lifetime degrading the strong, the rich, and the wise, if they meet one of these, they become terrified. What if he decides to hit back? The commoner is well aware he will lose any fight with someone healthy.
The commoner can't imagine how little the healthy man regards his words, if they were even noticed. The idea of not being harmed by mere sounds is incomprehensible.
The commoner turns to pre-emptive self-defence. Have to get him before he gets you. Which is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Now the commoner has become the healthy man's enemy. Now the healthy man must "neutralize" the commoners before he can get anything done.
Or rather, the healthy man has seen this before. Anyone who appears healthy will be attacked by the zombie horde, in a desperate attempt to drag them down to their level before it's too late. Democracy makes The People the enemy of their own champions and paragons.
E.g. wignats think [[[whiteness]]] will save them from having to admit their betters are better, or having to leave them alone. The [[race]] will do something, rather than some set of particular individuals.
Also why race science is so very persecuted. The debate is folk who think literally every human is identical, or those who think only all members of a race are identical. (By default, only hajnal europeans are human.) By showing that races have differences, race science lends power to the [[national]] Communists.
As usual with commoners, they have low-resolution, binary thinking. All [[Men]] are created equal - and everyone who isn't a [[Man]] is meaningless trash. 1 or 0. If blacks aren't 1, aren't [[Men]] literally the same as everyone else, then they're 0, they are all and without exception the worst kind of slave.
And that's your overton window. The real overton window can't be moved in the slightest. A titanium frame, riveted in place.
Very satanist. All positions are obvious lies. They're all loser positions. None of them can achieve dominance, they all have knockdown arguments against. The commoners could escape the trap without escaping the window if they could achieve nuance, but naturally the window was framed there precisely because this is where the impossible nuance is the only escape.
Nuance or loyally obeying their betters, of course. Should go without saying.
Don't forget there's a similar subtext debate about whether women are [[[human]]] or not. Or, occasionally, if men are [[[human]]]. The feminist [exact equality line has to held up at all costs, or else why not overtly enslave every woman, all women? Those are the only two viable options, right?
As always, plato was wrong about democracy differing from tyranny. "he will be governed entirely by the bad and the desire for the bad"
Does satan worship lead to Democracy, or does Democracy always converge upon Demoncracy, a fundamentalist theocracy of satanism? Perhaps no distinction can be drawn. It's the same picture.
The degenerate desire for Freedom, for liberty as an end rather than a means, is identical to desire for Tyranny. You might be tempted to say that, having received freedom, they instantly demand relief from the effects of freedom. Allegedly the tyrant is supposed to grant them freedom. Have an Emperor, because only an Emperor has the power to decree that they are free. Really pushing water uphill on that one.
I think they demand a tyrant directly. Democracy is not totalitarian as a minor oopsie or as an emergent result. The totalitarianism is the point. If they ever had freedom, they would use it to demand immediate tyranny. "Oppress me, and - this part is important - everyone I know!" Democrats say they love Freedom precisely because they loathe it beyond all reason. Demoncrats want freedom from responsibility, freedom from adulthood, freedom from freedom. And that's what they get. Not coincidentally, also liberated from the the lands of beauty. Free to be as ugly as possible.
Tuesday, September 16, 2025
Commoners vs. Health in Democracy, Overton Immobility, & Working as Intended
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I am confused by the use of 2 brackets versus 3 brackets.
You have "ideas," I have ""ideas,"" we are not the same. Some even have """ideas."""
Post a Comment