Dunning-Kruger vs. Critique of Pure Reason

If there's a need to write Critique of Pure Reason 2.0, there's no point in writing it because nobody can understand it. Nobody even wants to understand it.

If there's a population that can understand Critique of Pure Reason, there's no need to write it. They already know. 

Of course it doesn't help that Kant was frequently wrong and consequently wrote a shamefully fallacious version of the book. 

Ironically it was only readable at all exactly due to these errors, which his foolish readership apprehended as points in common.