Controlled Opposition as Truth Vaccine

Define controlled opposition:

A dissenting voice which is permitted to speak only as long as the dissent remains within strictly defined boundaries. 

(P.S. No examples of non-narrow boundaries have been recorded.) 

In other words, the thing being dissented against defines how the dissenter behaves. The thing being dissented against has power of succession; they can fire/silence the dissenter. The alleged enemy is the commander of the army. This 'opposition' is fundamentally inner party, not outer party.

It is, in the most technical sense, genuine opposition. However, it is limited and regulated by that which it is supposed to be opposing.

Controlled opposition vaccinates you against the truth. The opposition is genuinely inconvenient, but it repays the Satanist society with a powerful medicine against its enemies; profit. The vaccine offers a crippled, watered-down version falsehood rejection so that you don't get affected by the real thing. 

The opposition makes a big deal about being emotionally opposed to the Satanist, without being particularly opposed doctrinally or in principle. Pathos, not logos. 

Those who object to the lies are supposed to think their objections are being represented, when in fact they are being subverted. You're allowed to roll tanks into the Ukraine, you're just not allowed to put a Z on them. Trained to hallucinate that cosmetic objections are in fact substantial objections.

It's important to make the truth vaccine very mild and genteel. It should desperately portray itself as high status. It should not engage in emotional or vulgar lower-class displays. In this way, when you see a genuine, passionate embrace of truth, it should code as unhinged. They're not arguing or objecting, they're 'out of control.' They're weirdo LARPers that can't even wear bow ties or afford tailcoats or whatever.

As the Satanist society moves further and further away from pragmatic sense, this becomes easier and easier, as the truth becomes more and more "reactionary" according to polite social standards. 

The vaccine has a boomerang second wave. When you attempt the controlled opposition in a serious way, you find it doesn't work. This, via pathos and guilt by association, constitutes hallucinatory evidence that opposition per se is ineffective. When the vaccine fails you don't think the virus is for real, you think the putrid zombie, which experiences truth as a viral affliction, is a [winner].