The key is (ctrl-f) metacognition. Point your pattern-recognition networks at the patterns of false patterns. It probably won't work immediately for you, but it did for me. Unfortunately this means I don't know what kind of issues are likely to arise.
Note that sometimes, by chance, the evidence for a true pattern can be arranged as if it were a false pattern. Sometimes you can know from independent evidence that it's a real pattern; don't be surprised when it feels like a false one, be instead patient. If it's really real, the pattern will change. Generally speaking if the evidence you have looks like a false pattern, you should treat it as a false pattern, as that's the correct mistake to make.
I don't even see many false patterns anymore - the formerly-apophenious networks don't hand them to consciousness in the first place. The rest feel like 'what if?' stories, e.g. 'what if the sky was green?' Idle entertainment, not real.
Monday, March 21, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment