Women don't understand the idea of [no] per se, they only understand specific instances of [no]. As previously, they cast it in terms of universals because they perceive that's the fashion. Sometimes simply because talking is work and the grammatical universal is shorter.
"[This particular instance of] No means No! [Other {no}s are other {no}s and may or may not mean no.]"
Another theory states that women are irresponsible not because they want to be, but because the nearest man tells them to. Nobody is allowed to punish her for failing to do due diligence, so why would she bother with the effort? Why bother to keep in mind anything except a specific concrete instance?
Both the nearest man and women think you're not supposed to be listening to what women say, after all. Why would she put nonzero effort into something that ought to be ignored?
"Nobody listens to me!" "...is my sandwich on the way, or...?" If you respond coherently, you're plain doing it wrong, according to the local norms. Trying to respond articulately to feminism is merely two layers of doing it wrong. Get filtered, noob.
I don't make the rules. I tell you what they are.
If that makes her mad, well, sucks to be her. Shouldn't have been born a woman, lol. I guess the sandwich is going to be a bit. No no I kid, women love getting mad. Why do you think she does it so often? Don't be mean, provide her with lots of things to be mad about, so she isn't forced to invent them.
No comments:
Post a Comment