Hmm...

 You hear about how comically bad the CIA is.

 You hear about how terrifyingly good the KGB is.

 You barely hear about MI6 at all...

Fifth Reich Defeated

 Around 1969, the new left, american communism 4, violently overthrew fdr's american communism 3. So that's what happened in 1971 - they got around to implementing their policies. 

 The new new left, or the ew left for short, believe the new left isn't wholly devoted to their lord and saviour, Satan. Which is true. The ew left tried to [new left] the new left.

 The thing is, Satan worship is bad for you. That's kind of the point. The Satanist worships failure, worships being a loser. The purer Satanist, like a more pious devout of any higher power, gets their prayers answered more often. Purifying it makes it even more purely bad for you. In Satanist on Satanist action, the more devout Satanist gets, uh, Trumped. 

 The new left was already as purely communist as it is possible to get away with. On purpose; by conscious design. Communism 5 was too communist to live, even on this hell planet, with this hell specie.
 You could tell it was going down when you heard of the world economic forum from a journalist. They failed the [show up in the news] test. Justice grinds slow and fine, and apparently also deep states, and communists who aren't quite as batshit insane as some other communists. 

 

 It is not unrelated that the ew left wanted to supply slightly more tyranny than americans demand. 

 Perhapskis we will see the new left sacrificing the new new left as an offering, to permit them to reverse civil rights. "It wasn't our mistake, they fucked it up for everyone." Probably not. Empires decay. The cancer is already very terminal. But it's not impossible.

No Whitepill: Still Not Deporting Retards

 America will still continue to reward ignorance, self-deception, foolishness, or malice pretending to be any of those. 

 Call me when you can get banned from X for the great insight that battle can lead to deaths. Yes, officer, that one: too stupid, speech rights revoked. 

 The low shall be high, the high shall be low. Wisdom, deftness, competence, will continue to be punished. It will remain a useless intellectual wasteland. No respect, only disrespect. Degeneration as highest virtue.

 Still Envy worshippers.
 Hatred isn't real. It would be better if it were.
 Spite is their blood, their bones, their soul. Disregard destruction, acquire treacherous torment.

Christians Want Rotherham Everywhere

 Let's stop pretending the christian races don't hate themselves, particularly their children. They're not mad rotherham happened, they're mad it happened only in rotherham.

 The IRA existing in living memory. The cop shop in rotherham is still standing. This latter fact is what's known as [consent]. They want their daughters raped. They like it when their daughters are raped. They're pissed it was only underclass daughters, and not everyone.

 The sexual assault rate in schools is roughly 40,000/100,000. It's 17,000/100,000 just from staff. This is too low for the christian races. They want to import pakistanis et al to bump that up. 

 Consider that BLM happened, and all of america could only muster one St. Rittens. Further, he almost went to jail. Almost certainly required divine abjuration. (Also, Rittens was not good enough. Even if everyone was a Rittens, it would not be good enough.) This is consent. Everyone knows Rittens is anti-american, but jailing him for his flagrant subversion was so profane the heavens wouldn't allow it.

 Christians do not think abortion is murder. They'll work harder to get begonias in the front yard than they will to prevent a [[[murder]]]. (Go ahead, mess with their ugly flowers, see what happens.) That, or they like murder. They want murder to be higher. 

 It's exactly like a woman; "No tall dark scary stranger, don't rape me, oh no no don't do it." (The man was trying to mind his own business. "Who is this bitch and why is she suddenly talking to me?" They have to get childish animals, or the manipulation is too crude to work.) 

 What christians object to is having fewer children to torture. The wrong of murder, some states believe, is less wrong than leaving them alive, so the murder has to go. 

 When the dad is arrested by rotherham cops for reporting underage actually-violent rape, he is grateful. "Sorry sorry I don't know what came over me." The cops are there to rescue him from his unreconstructed stone-age instincts.The dad got confused, and thought he might get censured for stripping all security from his daughter. Don't worry man, we gotchu. Nothing more than supply for demand.
  It's cope. Now the dad can believe he can claim [I tried my best].
 I would call them losers, but losing is the point. "Yes! Thank you for noticing!"

 

 Why do prepubescent english boarding school kids even think of buggery, lol? The buggery was the point. I wonder what went wrong? Perhaps the boys accidentally stopped buggering each other. "Wait...this is actually evil. Why don't I defend myself?" Too young to fully understand submission, see. Weren't soycialized enough yet. The sexual assault rate got lower than 90,000/100,000. Whoops, can't have that. "Let's try locking the boys up with girls and minimal supervision. Don't forget to rile them up with porn mags and bikinis." 

 

 Always remember, if your society is in decline, you don't deserve decline. You deserve worse.
 What's pissing you off: not receiving what you deserve. Work hard, I'm sure you'll get there.

RFK believes free speech isn't a right. As he shouldn't.

 "RFK just gave a flawless answer to Bernie Sanders asking if health care is a human right. Bet Sanders didn't expect an answer this intelligent... he interrupted RFK IMMEDIATELY. 

 "SANDERS: Is it a human right? Yes or no? 

 "RFK: In the way that free speech is? It's different, because free speech costs nothing. In health care - if you smoke cigs for 20 years, and you get cancer - you are now taking from the pool of resources..-" https://twitter.com/EricLDaugh/status/1884650963140596219

 

 Free speech isn't free.
 Do you pay for your twitter server? lel

 Subsidized speech.
 [[[Free]]] publishing. 

 Even if you're only permitted to say whatever you want verbally, with your mouth, with your friends at the bar, you have to prosecute the bartender who throws you out. Which costs money. 

 Naturally this irrelevant eric loser, by quoting RFK, also believes this. He's just lying about it, because he believes (probably correctly) it's politically useful in the short term.

School is Hate

 Fasco-Communists, black governments, Nameless One worshippers, make a big deal about Hate. 

 What is it, really? Hate is when you are under the power of honourless evil. 

 If you're under the power of a honourable man who hates you, he will kill you. It won't suck for very long. 

 True Hate can only be received from madmen or the depraved. 

 In particular, schoolteachers. As a student, they have absolute power over your fate. You can't even go to the bathroom without explicit permission. Further and obviously, at best they don't care about you at all. Indeed it's clear that if you express joy, they get upset. Having fun? Getting along with your friends? Cut that out. Cut that out right now. 

  There's no need to demonstrate this is a major purpose of the school system. Ensure all children, when faced with at-best-indifferent masters, masters who are their enemies, the child feels despair. The child gives up, surrenders, doesn't even try to fight back. It must become an absolutely engrained habit. 

 Ironically, I have to say the system doesn't work. Personnel is policy. If the children weren't basically losers in the first place, it wouldn't function. It won't take root in anyone who wasn't born to submit. Almost all the hassle has no strategic function.
 It's done because children are born to folk to hate them, who want them to suffer. Naturally, such losers will hate themselves with unlimited passion. They have trouble tormenting themselves, as their own Darwinian instincts are in the way, so they outsource the torment to someone else, who can't flinch from the task. Likewise, they hate their children - the children remind the parents of themselves, as one does, but likewise, the parents can't easily torment the children.
 The point of school isn't to efficiently break any leftover bits of virtue. The point is that these masters are deranged and depraved. They want the agony to be as inefficient as possible. Any reasonable kid could absorb the whole k-12 curriculum in under two years? Yes. They know. They are well aware. That's why they want to push for pre-K. 

  True Hate can only be received from madmen or the depraved. However, they are weak. You don't need training to beat a madman in a fight, you need training to lose to a madman in a fight. Unless you're a true degenerate, a garbage slime in human form.

 School looks like it works, because schoolchildren grow up to be politicians on twitter. Arguing that their masters should show them Hatred in a different way. "Massa massa that's too much hatred! How are you supposed to go on hating us if we don't reproduce? Think of the birf rate!" It never occurs to them that it's possible to swear fealty to a master who doesn't Hate them. 

 Seemingly never occurs to them. Go ahead and tell one in words. It's not like they'll experience a lightning bolt of inspiration. A master who didn't despise them wouldn't serve their goals. It would not supply their demands. What a pointless suggestion. Hence: voting. ¡Jeb!

Manifestation of Revenge is Sour in Degeneracy

 Normally, one believes the γαυς were let out of the closet, and therefore all positive male interaction was sexualized. (gamma alpha upsilon sigma) Men now had to explicitly [no homo] any indication of approval or affection...or rather, most can't be arsed, so no positive interaction is now possible.

 That's backwards, isn't it? It's not that γαυς were let out of the closet and now everyone is γαυ, it's that everyone got γαυ, therefore γαυs were let out of the closet. "Eh, why bother?" and they no longer did. 

 Voters, women, and peasants lack masculinity.  φαγγωτς
 Civilization believes it has no use for males.

 Hitler's communists bullied minorities because they believed getting bullied maximizes suffering. They lost because they were deeply mistaken. Obviously bullying the majority on behalf of some tiny minority causes far more suffering. Especially if the minority is deeply diseased, incapable of satisfaction. 

 When you're already kind of γαυ, what happens if a man gives you a compliment? You start developing feelings. If you don't want to be γαυ, you have to tell him "that's γαυ," projecting the issue. Being harsh with your friends cunts becomes a norm. Because you're all γαυ cunts. 

 The strategy is to use all the harsh language as a "joke" that nobody could possibly take seriously. But isn't a lot easier if you're a total cunt for real? Why make them go to all the effort to come up with fake insults when you can inspire real ones? You are here.

 Degeneracy.

Politicians 101

 Politicians lie. 

 They tell whatever lie they need to support their own selfish interests. 

 They are venal, interested only in humiliation. 

 For example, they like money because it can humiliate other politicians who have less money. They like sex because the politician can brag about buying sex when the other guy has to do without.

 Because they're interested in humiliation, mere greed is a mere means. The end is humiliating their opponents. Their political rivals have the exact same set of desires, but a competing resource base with which to buy humiliation. 

 For example, it is not hard to make both the countryside and the cities richer at the same time. It's called production and trade. However, politicians are actively against anything which makes their rivals richer, even if it has no effect on them personally. Keep in mind that destruction is cheaper than creation. Both countryside politicians and city politicians try to buy creation for their own base and destruction for the other side, but destruction is cheaper. They successfully buy far more destruction than creation, and the result is the society as a whole loses.

 The correct thing for a society to do is ostracize the politicians. Let them keep whatever they've seized, but let them destroy each other, as they will do if nobody props them up. Once they wipe themselves out, re-expand into the empty space, retaining the strict anti-politician laws. 

 What in fact happens is everyone, as if in a drug-fuelled frenzy, eyes dialated, nobody home, joins in the politicking. 

  Everyone on twitter is a politician. They're just lying. If they're not lying, it's merely a coincidence. The truth happens to align with the lie they were going to tell anyway. If it associates truth with politicians, so much the worse for poor truth. 

 Democracy is about dragging everyone into politics, doing the exact opposite of outlawing it. 

 Politicians lie. They get into the habit of lying, and aren't trustworthy even to each other. If, in an orgy of violence, the city destroys the countryside, the city politicians will immediately fracture into fractions, so they can have someone new to humiliate. At any time a politician can't attack some distant politician, they will immediately attack a close politician. They are genuine, physiological, literal addicts. They cannot help themselves. 

 Let me emphasize; it's not merely that they serve their own interests. They are only attracted to serving their interests at your expense. If it doesn't cost you anything, they find it repulsive.

 There is no such thing as a politician with principles, any more than heroin addicts have meaningful principles. If it gets them the hit, they do it. That is, unless you count [injecting heroin] as a principle. Likewise, politicians are very very principled about [kto kovo]. They hate, they loathe, the win-win.

 If you want to know why a politician is jonesing for this thing or that thing, follow the money. Works 100% of the time. 200% of the time. They know this too, which is why they haven't already told you how they get paid. Please note that if you see a christian who is not a politician, they are christianing wrong. Testable: you can correct them if you like. They will appreciate you setting them on the proper path of addiction. Also true of buddhists, hindus, etc etc. Any religion that shows up in wikipedia is merely a political group, like a reverse alcoholics anonymous. Anti-anonymous, and trying to get you in as deep as possible. Indeed, the reason christians came up with AA is because they don't like it when booze competes for the addiction slot.

 Oh hey I just figured out why schedule 1 drugs are illegal. The world is not a mysterious place. 

 Politicians like taxes, as opposed to trade, precisely because taxes are traitorous. Deviant, defective. Farmers could get more money by selling a better product, but to a politician, it is dramatically preferable to get more money by selling a worse product and taking tax dollars instead. Thus automatically creates competing interests, so they can humiliate the competitor. The farm bill takes tax dollars from the city, from corporations, and gives it to the countryside. Various industry [protections] and [unions] take wealth from the city and give it to factories. Hence, farms have to be shut down. Hence, factories have to be offshored. So that the political rivals in universities or whatever can get that sweet sweet hit of heroin. Or literally cocaine sometimes.

 

 

 The worst part is the lying is all completely pointless. You can sort of see a point in academic debates because it can make unaffiliated undergrads join your lab instead of your rival's. In politics, self-absorbed-interest is determined by circumstances. You can't lie so hard a city-dweller thinks they live on a farm and get paid for vegetables. You can't lie so hard a crime-and-welfare wokist thinks they work in a factory. You can't lie so hard an IRS agent doesn't know they can embezzle more money if there are more residents. Paul Fussel and Shakespeare mention this. Much sound and fury, signifying nothing. Tremendous struggle for status, with not a single shred of gain to show for it; net worth is a genetic trait.

 The lying poisons the well, uglifies the tellers, and has no purpose beyond these negative side effects. Or rather, the hideous side-effects are the point. Homo sapiens is truly revolting.

 Even those undergrads are worthless. If they can't be tricked, they join the highest-status or richest lab they can find, regardless of debates. If a debate sways them, they are gullible morons, easily a net burden on your lab. 

 Debates could have a point. First it's necessary to be rid of the politicians.