Antisemitism is Jewish

 Nobody hates the Jews as much as the Jews do, and everyone trying to hate the Jews more than Jews do is Jewing themselves. 

 I really shouldn't have to explain this. Likely, revenge is sour - explaining it can only be useful if it is unnecessary.

 Look: the Amish don't have a JQ. How they managed that while retaining Christianity I don't quite understand (mass non-literacy?) but they certainly don't. Whether you have Jews in your community is none of their business. They don't care because they don't have to care.

 If you control your community and control your ideology - if you have secured your shit - the JQ solves itself. Folk who can handle Jewish presence can have them, and folk who can't deal can not have them, and I don't need to care any more than the Amish do.

 Sidenote, this obsession with Jews is exactly what the Jews want. An entire race of natural narcissists who die immediately if they don't get attention. 

 It's a [making your enemies look cool] moment and you're only feeding their narcissistic megalomania. "Yes I am extremely significant, thanks for noticing." 

 Screaming about the JQ is always [loser energy] since you're telling me you live in territory controlled by your enemies. "I have to live with foreigners." Umm...you're the immigrant here. Either [reconquista] or leave, quit it with this childish womanly bitching holy shit.
 Turns out it was not a surprise when Germany lost the war. It is inevitable that losers will lose - no matter how pathetic their opponent is.

 That you have a JQ shows that you fucked up horrendous. If you refuse to solve the underlying problem, even if you went full mythological Hitler it would merely re-appear in a different form.

 Yes, it's Envy. Rather than building themselves up, they're trying to find someone to tear down. Jews merely happen to enjoy volunteering for the role, so this power law favours them.

Desire, Beyond Good and Evil

 Anti-nihilism is moral nihilism, and if anything, nihilism is true morality. 

 Nietzsche noticed that universal morality is a contradiction in terms, and good for him. The problem is you immediately uncover an underlying issue: if we're not deciding what to do on 'moral' terms, how are we deciding what to do? There are still correct and incorrect decisions. We've merely removed a broken scam that was pretending to tell them apart. Our insight has shown us that we do not, in fact, know the difference between incorrect and correct. Don't know what to look for (which is how the scam took traction in the first place). 

 What did [[Morality]] claim to be trying to do? What are you trying to do? How are such things done? 

 To have a purpose, one must have a goal. To have a goal, one must have desires. 

 The point of ""morality"" is to satisfy your desires.

 

 The core of kosmos is desire.
 If it were decay, the cosmos could never advance beyond a seed.
 It cannot be perfection and stasis, or nothing would happen, not even thoughts such as gratitude.
 Existence is change. Existence is desire. Kosmos is growth. The very core of Existence is the desire to Exist but moreso.

 

 The Christians produce a lot of high-flying rhetoric to camouflage the fact that morality is but a tool of desire. They say there's someone bigger who has better desires than you. Unfortunately for anyone who loathes falsehood, this is exactly the same as the thing they allegedly oppose. Consciousness => desires. If sky daddy's desires lead you to a better life, they were your desires all along. If they don't, then sky daddy is a traitorous demon who wants you to suffer. Big consciousness might mean high-perceived-status consciousness, but it doesn't necessarily mean better, wiser consciousness.

 The point of any tool is to satisfy your desires. The Christian sky daddy is nothing but a tool with more decoration than substance, and the decoration is all glamour. 

 

 Morality, especially universal morality, only has any scholarly weight if it runs contrary to your desires. It is necessarily a traitorous scam. A tool that can only be used to attack those who consider the user their ally. Morality inherently opposes and suppresses desire, which means it opposes and suppresses value. It is inherently dishonourable and inglorious. Every connotation of [nihilism] is in truth carried by universal morality. It is universal morality that is shabby, dirty, depraved, and empty. Below, I will show that universal morality is the philosophy of decay, failure, and suffering.

 Nihilism, then, is support of desire. The exaltation of goals and achievement. It is nihilism that surrenders and submit to the truth that value is valuable. 

 Nihilism is the philosophy that consciousness should succeed. Consciousness should get what it wants. Consciousness should be satisfied.

 Desire fundamentally is about change. Desire wishes the universe to evolve into something materially different. Desire is growth; desire wants the cosmos to be more than it already is. 

 Consequently its opposite, universal morality, must necessarily be a desire for decay and oppression. An inherently self-loathing desire-to-destroy-desires. Note that ""master"" morality is still a universal morality. Nietzsche himself was a worshipper of failure.

 It is now very easy to explain local or nihilist morality. It is wisdom. Rather than the difference between ""right"" and ""wrong"" (truly loathsome profanities) it is the difference between correct and incorrect. If you desire wood it is the difference between trying to cut wood with a saw instead of trying to cut wood with a pencil. It is knowing the effects and consequences of your actions so you can choose the ones that further your desires. Secondarily, I'll mention it's knowing which desires you truly value, and which are mere whims.

 A functioning local morality is nothing more than a set of habits which work. Which are effective. Which are good tools to the owners, the members of the local society. All the sanctimonious moralizing and glamorizing myths about these tools are just that - sanctimonious myths. 

 A cooperator is merely someone who is willing to trade and uphold someone else's desires in exchange for upholding their own. A defector desires to trample desire. A defector inherently justifies - usually deviants claim justification is necessary - the sabotage of the defector themselves. If desires ought to be trampled, then trample the desire to trample desires. I mean, duh. Be especially sure to do that one first. Defectors are self-loathing. You should agree; loathe them too.

 Note that wisdom is very much subordinate to desire. No course of action can be correct or incorrect without a desire to compare it to. Without a desire, you can't have goals, without goals, you can't have a purpose. Consciousness comes first, along with the desires which are the inherent nature of consciousness in the same way that mass is an inherent quality (and quantity) of physical energy. 

P.S. I especially like how anti-Buddhist I find Reality to be.

Effects of Circumcision on Sex

 Circumcision is an attempt to tame the hypertrophied sexuality of the famously perverted Jews. It didn't work, and then it got out of hand.

 Actual result: men get moisturized for the first time during sex, then try to have so much sex they replace the foreskin with pussy. The body can tell something is wrong, can tell something is fixing it, but can't correctly prioritize. Wisdomless peasants incapable of self-reflection then get trapped at high rates.

 Or, alternatively, they only get pleasure from pressure on the urethra and notably a male hand can apply a lot more pressure than a normal woman. https://nitter.unixfox.eu/CunningMastiff/status/1719767914893504729

 Oh wait is that what oral is for? Working some lubricant into the dry head of the cut man so he isn't almost  insensate during the act itself.

 This has been an entry in 'no one knows anything' - naturally twitter 'experts' never think of the circumcision angle, because they can't escape narcissistic egalitarianism. 

 There's also the fake sex drive angle. You're supposed to discover the opposite sex during puberty, but if you're dysfunctional and mutated enough you have no sex drive, which means it's merely dopamine/reward. Sexual stimulation feels good; the sexless mindlessly mimic the driven, get stimulated, and the empty sex drive slot is filled by an association with whatever first offered the reward. Straight, gay, solo, doesn't matter. They have no genuine sex drive, merely a wireheading or lotus-eating reflex. 

White Knights are Girls

 I'm too lazy to explain in detail at present: [white knight] is an archetype of mother. 

 Figure out yourself how surprisingly profound this is: all mothers are women, and there's a good reason women can't be successful knights. Evolution already tried to categorically ban that sort of behaviour.

Physics is Especially Easy

 Caino hypocriens thinks physics is hard precisely because physics is the easiest. It's so easy they can't fool themselves into thinking they're right when they're not. 

 The physics-chemistry-biology-psychology series is not hard-soft, it's easy-challenging. In psychology it's absolutely trivial to convince yourself of howling falsehoods, because the systems are so complicated, hence interesting. 

 I never cease to chuckle at the fact it goes back to trivial for sociology. Combo uh I mean Symmetry breaker!

 In physics you can just do the experiment. The fact you can get sig figs out to 16 places means it's unchallenging to set up a clean experiment addressing these topics, not that physicists are more capable. 

 Physicists are smarter than chemists because smart folk go to places they can be lazy. Smarter folk notice when their own experiments are scamming them. Rather than fix the experiments - there's no grant for that, after all - they choose to avoid these experiments, and end up in physics. Those who are left behind are too dumb and get trapped by their own poor choices or can't even tell anything is wrong.

What if Nuclear Cars are Feasible?

 There is 100% a much cooler car technology that nobody has found because they murdered science in 1945. 

 I use nuclear cars as an example since 'muh radiation' is such an obvious superstition. It's blocked by fundamentalism. Whether it is also blocked by practicality is irrelevant - more on this later.

 You can make real good nuclear batteries, "10 times more than the specific energy of commercial chemical cells." The problem is power. They last absolutely forever - 100-year half-life means this one lasts like 50 years before significant declines in power output - which means it's 10x capacity divided by 100 years, so 0.1 of the normal-battery capacity is the total annual output. 

 What you need is fast decay isotopes. These obviously can't be stored. You could generate them, though. 

 Hence, imagine this: instead of having a carburetor, you have a cyclotron, and it generates radiation on-site from slow-decaying isotopes like nickel-63. Hey presto, nuclear car.
 This means you have your 10x energy density less cyclotron running costs, but refuelling is still some kind of fluid, meaning it doesn't take hours. Perhaps a particulate suspension. Imagine a Tesla with 8x the range. Now you're cooking with nuclear gas.

 But nobody can prototype this, because muh radiation. The whole point of beta radiation is that you generate a current by capturing it, it's not [multiple feet of lead] gamma radiation. Maybe the math works out, maybe it doesn't. It would definitely be a cool novelty if the math doesn't work out.

 As I've mentioned before, we should at very least have personal blimps. Speaking of radiation, alpha radiation is basically helium manufacturing. Hydrogen is a better lifting gas, but it's like 20-25% better. If your alpha radiation's alpha use is generating heat for power, then the helium might even have a negative cost. Is it like [muh hindenburg] but it's not like flammability is totally irrelevant. 

 What else?

 What does 1 microwatt per cubic centimeter mean? It means to get a full watt you need a million of these things, which is 1 cubed meter. To get a kilowatt you need a thousand meters cubed...which is ten meters on a side. Not even your whole basement. Bonus: avoid the health-sapping aura of of AC current, no Faraday cages required. Terrible for any movement technology, totally fine for a stationary building. 

 Yeah this is not cost effective. Nuclear batteries are hardly cheap...someone should have done this for a novelty. Either get power-efficient appliance, enlarge the basement for 2 kW, and voila, go off the grid for the rest of your life, give or take a major earthquake. In 100 years it will need maintenance, and then you can just keep going. (I would build a secondary basement.) Doing things for novelty regularly leads to figuring out how to do them at profitable cost levels.

 Long-distance power transmission is high-voltage for efficiency. Hey, what's that: "However, the idle voltage of the device was way too high—tens of kilovolts—and the current was too low for practical applications." Is it possible to make a power plant that's just an array of nuclear batteries? Well, not an AC plant, probably, no. Admittedly that's less a dead-science issue than a tyranny and freedom issue. AC is not used because it's better, it's used because politics and DC is illegal. The tyranny is upstream of science being murdered....

Everyday Cargo Cults: Homelessness

 Cargo-cult behaviour is a human universal. Usually it starts with cope, just as with the original cargo cult. 

 In this case, it's trying to solve the 'homelessness' problem by putting a roof over their head. Hey moron, the problem with the ""homeless"" isn't the lack of a house, the problem is they're the kind of person who can't reliably provision themselves with shelter. This sort of thing comes with, shall we say, co-morbidities. They're not pleasant and happy folk who happen to have accidentally misplaced this month's rent money. If you put them all in houses at great taxpayer expense, you have not even addressed the problem, let alone solved it.

 You can go ahead and blame this particular cargo cult on the wordcels. They made up a new fake word to describe bums and vagrants, then psyopped themselves into thinking bums were merely "homeless." 

 You've sure made a great stink about looking like you're helping, though. It's considered impolite, even criminal, to point out a cargo cult is a cargo cult. Especially when it's aggravating the symptoms. 

 Especial shame for this moron. 

 Force all the homeless into houses* or back to where they came from. This is your genius solution? You really suppose they didn't think of that already? The reason it's not happening is not lack of "good intentions" lol roflmao. 

"This is a long read but a fantastic one"  peggymangot/status/1697664909021155463
Plato said it first: "They will be consumed by the bad and the desire for the bad." Actively laud debasement and scorn virtue. Some idiots are shocked that demand for the bad leads to supply of the bad.

*(Isn't that jail with extra steps?)

 Real-name namefags. Not even once. Don't even have the sophistication to realize they need to be pseudonymous...

On Abortion

 Because Christians are in fact Satanists, it's not about abortion. 

 "It’s non-strategic, purely based on religious feeling." https://nitter.unixfox.eu/RolloRollon/status/1722146127901028602
 They lose because Satan loves it when you suffer and fail. If they started winning they would sabotage themselves. 

 Satanists say they worship the god of love because they worship self-hatred. 

 

 "WHY NOT [both power and morality]? WHY IS ABORTION THE ONLY ISSUE CATHOLICS ARE WILLING TO MOBILIZE ON???"
https://nitter.unixfox.eu/RolloRollon/status/1722147267208233201

 

 America is a Satanic Fascist theocracy, so it's all backwards day. The pro-life Christians think abortion is fine. The pro-choice crowd thinks abortion is bad, and that's why they're doing it.

 If you really thought abortion was child sacrifice, you would kidnap pregnant women and forcibly prevent abortion doctors from reaching them. You might even have abortion-prone women locked up to prevent them from having sex and getting pregnant in the first place. You wouldn't...put stickers on things and, like, bitch about it. Your greatest show of resistance wouldn't be sitting around quietly, but in public.

 The pro-life crowd isn't pro-life. It's about failure.

 The other thing you would do: stop trying to conquer a nuclear-armed country with mean rhetoric. The Amish don't have abortions. If you renounce America, you can solve the ""problem"" immediately. They're trying to change America as a whole before cleaning their rooms because it won't work. 

 

 It's also about being a criminal.

 If someone else is sinning, whose business is that? It's God's business. It's none of yours.
They're motivated by traitorous meddling.

 I would say it's about bullying, but they're so devout about failure that it's all form and no function. If any of it succeeded it would be about forcing a known delusion on someone else through mob hate and peer pressure. Control purely for the sake of tyranny.

 Hence, a lot of it is about making folk feel bad. Trying to make them feel like a worthless outcast. Just pure hate. However, we include self-hate. Primarily about making themselves feel bad. Satan would have approved. 

 

 As we can see, it's turning out wonderfully They are indeed failing horribly and feeling like total losers as a result. Everything working as intended. Someone who hates themselves that much clearly deserves it. Justice wins again. 

 

 Also note that if you really really thought abortion was child sacrifice and you weren't a dishonourable, irresponsible traitor, you really wouldn't do anything about it. Not your children, not your problem. Unless they're sacrificing your children, it's between them and God. And indeed, it's best if such an evil polity sacrifice all their children and cease to exist. "Geeze man, why only some? Abort them all!" More justice more better.

 But, remember, the pro-choice crowd think it really is murder; they're trying to sully and damn their own souls. Self-desecration as expression of self-hatred. They can't abort them all because someone has to hate themselves in the future.