Fascists send their children off to be tortured by pedophiles in concentration camps. They also put some adults, members of minorities, into concentration camps.
Communists send their children off to be tortured by pedophiles in concentration camps. They also put quite a few adults in concentration camps, often favouring members of the majority.
Leftists are pedophiles. No exceptions.
Democracies send their
children off to be tortured by pedophiles in concentration camps.
Insofar as there are differences, there's no reason to care. They aren't different enough to matter to anyone who isn't also a pedophile.
Some alleged dissidents mention that the ruling class are exceptionally evil. "That hate you, they want you dead, and they think it's funny." Dissidents won't properly call a spade a spade. No matter how vile a word you use for leftists, it is never too vile. It is impossible to condemn them more than they deserve.
Alleged rightists deserve a leftist ruling class because they turn away from the truth. They think calling every Fascist a pedophile is going too far. This thought is exactly what a pedophile wants and needs.
How much aid and comfort do they have to give to the enemy before you recognize they can't possibly be enemies?
Democracy is perhaps best described as the children seizing control of the whorehouse.
They want to grow up to be like mommy, just like every child desires. Mommy doesn't want them to, but what does she know? Clearly, getting raped worked out for her. If she didn't solicit rape, both she and the kids would be out on the street.
The kiddies want to practice getting diddled, the way mommy gets diddled. Monkey see, monkey do. "Equal opportunity (for dick)." How else are they supposed to learn to be a proper adult, like mommy? There are more children than whores, so the whores get outvoted. Having seized control of the whorehouse, the children get what they want.
Democracy is pedophilia.
8 comments:
>Some alleged dissidents mention that the ruling class are exceptionally evil. "That hate you, they want you dead, and they think it's funny." Dissidents won't properly call a spade a spade.
wow what a kinky dink, i was just here yesterday
"the combined essence of [american schizophrenic values] is a belief that one can trick god
"it's ok if i just take a little bit right? heh heh heh"
but it's everyone, at every step, and also the lord doesn't notice, or doesn't do anything, which is the same thing
there was one really good line i read once which i don't think i'll be able to retrieve
everyone always talks about what it means for others to correct errors in public, but rarely does anyone comment on what it means for the self
the line went, the main reason why people don't expose others, is they feel they will get exposed themselves. but not in retaliation from others. it's not a matter of proper subterfuge. like wielding a weapon that is too powerful that will also hit yourself.
but it didn't invoke "weapon" or "god". i don't think it invoked anything. how did it do that. some kind of structure trick. i can't remember.
"human life is valuable" is just a way of saying "i don't want to die". that's it.
the speaker is not speaking in words. the speaker does not understand words. the words are just a way to trick the listener into a certain course of action. if these words didn't work, they'd find another way.
fake companies fake products fake work bad
*getting paid for fake companies fake products fake work good
rather than any endeavors to resolve the contradiction, the explicit goal is to maintain it. "both sides are right". "we must find a balance". "let's not be extreme about this"."
as for "There are more children than whores, so the whores get outvoted.":
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
I would invoke discipline. "Judge not, lest ye be judged."
Me: "Neat, I'm a judge every day and twice on sundays."
Democratic Man: "Right, good advice. Big tent! Everyone is good enough!"
If you create an environment of discipline, you risk getting disciplined. Democratic Man doesn't do, like, risk. All short-term risks must be zero, or he can't sleep at night. This inevitably creates huge long-term risks, but who cares about that?
Have to ensure there's no risk of missing out on a john. Scawwy scawwy risk of envying those who did get paid. Even if that maximizes the risk of getting STDs. "Dying of syphilis acceptance. There's nothing wrong with shambling crazed half-dead corpses - it could be you, you never know!"
"The US defaulted on its debts in 1787."
Deadbeat country.
oh shit
schizophrenic values = one can trick god = there is such a thing as a free lunch = 'crime can be okay'
Those rebelling against Existence certainly aren't going to win by force of arms. By process of elimination, they intend to use trickery. Lies, you might say.
"[Traitors] and [treachery] can be rewarded by God."
Man [both sides are right] really is a huge tell, isn't it?
I'm a truth extremist. More truth always better.
They're a [moderate] meaning they want to gas up both sides of a contradiction. They're explicitly against truth extremism, i.e. against truth per se.
Well, that's self-hatred for you. It can't not be contradictory; that's one of the ways of seeing that it's inherently (and the only thing which is) evil.
Perhaps I should read more about the schizophrenic values and tricking god.
main trigger was jd vance commenting on (which) donald trump attempted assassination https://x .com/JDVance/status/1835823158957391923
"Instead, I'm asking all of us to reject censorship. Reject the idea that you can control what other people think and say. Embrace persuasion of your fellow citizens over silencing them--either through the powers of Big Tech or through moral blackmail.
I think this will make our public debate much better. But there's something else. Reject censorship and you reject political violence. Embrace censorship, and you will inevitably embrace violence on its behalf.
The reason is simple. The logic of censorship leads directly to one place, for there is only one way to permanently silence a human being: put a bullet in his brain."
comment:
"it occurred to me this is an example of an 'american idea' ... "freedom of speech"
aside from speech being a gemini thing, i think it's not an obvious thing in most places
freedom to speak implies freedom to act and to think, which is related to the again american idea that all men are kings. this is memed today by niggers but it's the same as the old 'every american sees himself as a temporarily embarrassed millionaire'. no one sees himself as a peasant.
it is a violent or next to violent act to decide to think for yourself. it is a way of declaring you are king.
there's some schizophrenia here which i don't already buy which leads to why americans are communist and eternally violent rather than coalescing into a single state or dissolving into many states. which seems obvious. "free speech is not violent" is dubious but "free speech is the opposite of violence" is clearly false
"i want free speech, but only when it's not violent (definition of violent constantly moved (by the real sovereign) for local convenience)" or something"
wowex linked this to jim https://blog.reaction .la/faith/intelligence-and-religiosity/ which says jews thinks they can trick god and muslims think god is unknowable; both are adjacent to thinking the world is unknowable/unpredictable. which links back to religiousity: 'because' there is a god, only He™ knows the future, and that means (You) don't.
which is pretty funny, cause it's consistently obvious people who don't think they can know things are irreverent slimes and people who do think they can know things have respect for people and things and physics and, if not a god themself, clearly they respect other peoples' gods.
oh there was a precursor. four days prior to above. i forgot about this.
">wendys changing prices per customer is expected
>uber changing payout per driver is probably illegal
americans love crime
america is a criminal country and americans are a criminal people
the "fuck you got mine" is so deep
"actually i can get away with it heh heh heh"
"oh no it's happening to me!"
man
"the weird thing is we don't know what they're using to discriminating against. what if it's like, if they know the type of driver who's more desperate, or likely to complain"
why is it weird atrioc
why isn't it weird for wendy's
why does it matter whether you know or not
"nowadays if you factor in the cost of car maintenance"
why weren't cars maintained for the past ten years atrioc
or was car maintenance free via some uber program i don't know about
why are you full of shit atrioc
oh
oh so its bad if wal-mart hikes the price on tylenol if you search child fever in google
but it's not bad if you're getting a burger at wendy's
i hate americans
god damn americans"
>become less likely to complain
>get paid more
<oh no oh shit this is so awful ban it ban it
Post a Comment