It is great that women are what they are and men are what they are, otherwise I would have an absolutely terrible sex life.Can't change just one thing. Were wereman/wifman relations different, you would be different in unpredictable ways.
In fact there are several animals with superior kinds of mating pacts. It is probable even other human subspecies had better mating pacts.
It is good that men should lead, and women should follow.Alternatively, children could not require both parents to trigger all the environmental development cues. However, as it is, someone needs to lead. It probably does need to be the more expendable gender.
It is great that whites are superior to all brown and black races in intelligence and prosocial conduct.Depends. If the playing field can be levelled upward, then no. Otherwise, the alternative is not that browner races are more competent, but that paler races are less competent, which would be clearly inferior.
East Asian men are not all that overrepresented among competent engineers relative to white men, whereas east Asian women are way overrepresented among competent engineers relative to white women.Korean video gaming shows Korean men having markedly higher reaction times than white men. Reaction time strongly correlates with IQ.
However, they lack creativity and/or independent thinking. E.g. white hobbits learn from the Fall of Rome. E.g. the average person knows seizing power through force is to usurp, which is why Western armies don't take over Western countries, but the Chinese have not learned from China's bicentennial civil wars. E.g. Chip fabs are largely Chinese these days, but chip fab designers, even in China, are almost all white. E.g, this guy.
When I say white men are naturally more manly, manliness reflects both environment and racial nature. Prewar Japanese were the most manly of men, postwar Japanese among the least manly of men.There's an inverse relationship between racial IQ and baseline testosterone for both genders. The most feminine women are asian, the most masculine men are black. This is why if you have the races of a miscegenating couple, you can almost always guess the genders.
That said, nerds have solved manliness. The thing to do now is give engaged men manliness classes under the term 'how to keep your woman.' Do that and could probably leave divorce as no-fault. Not a great idea, but it would be good enough.
It is great that white males are better warriors than east Asian males, regardless of whether east Asian males might be slightly smarter.Again, it matters whether the alternative is levelling up or levelling down.
Is it great that whites are prone to using and being used by sanctimonious moralizing?
Is it great that whites take words so lightly it's almost impossible to have a frank conversation?
Is it great that whites will work so hard they effectively flee their own family and community?
Is it great that whites are reliably ashamed of using violence to defend themselves?
Is it great that whites are so 'altruistic' that they can't tell the difference between being kind to strangers and enabling terrorists?
Is it great that whites are so individually proud they can be easily flattered, and find it all but impossible to acknowledge their betters as better?
We should love what we are, rather than conceding that the left is morally superior for wishing reality away.Thing is, morality don't real. They can't be morally better because there's nothing there to be better at. Or worse, for that matter.
This means there's little difference between preferring your own race and having goodwill for all races.
On the other hand, progressives refuse to cooperate with most whites, meaning it's imprudent to cooperate with progressives while being white. Progressivism only continues to live because these other whites don't cut them off. Apparently due to a combination of pride and vulnerability to hysterical moralizing.
Let's see if I can guess this post's URL: http://alrenous.blogspot.com/2016/04/inequality-vs-morality.html