Out-Lie Satan Strategy

 This strategy is a full cuck strategy. It's obvious that trying to peddle a falsehood to the Father of Lies is not going to work out for you, but how does that work out physically? Why is this Alchemical correspondence predictive?

 The out-lie Satan strategy is about challenging the defect throne without challenging it. It's a one-level self-contradiction. 

 Our Nameless sovereigns peddle the egalitarian lie. Then [[rightists]] or [[conservatives]] try to out-lie the Nameless One, to prevent the toxic effects of the egalitarianism lie without having to challenge Egalitarianism. 

 E.g, if men and women are identical, and men can decide who they marry, women must also be able to decide who they marry. Except women obviously can't decide this. Thus [[conservatives]] come up with [age of consent] to prevent tiny 13-year-old girls from marrying themselves off to whichever violent thug threatens/extorts her first. The Nameless Ones then twist this to prevent established adult men from being able to get virgin brides - the violent thugs extort tiny girls for whore sex instead of marriage, lol. Great work, [[rightists]]. Lies always serve Namelessness. [Age of consent] fails to protect juvenile women and does functionally support and uphold Egalitarianism. 

 If you want to challenge Satan without challenging Satan, you are a Satanist. You submit to Namelessness. It might look like virulent cowardice, but naturally Satanists are without honour. It's faith.

 Correspondence two: lying under a Nameless regime is inherently about submitting to Satan. Trying to usurp the liar throne without challenging lies per se. 

 Subversion of deviant structures supports those structure. The usurper always claims (falsely) that black kings have legitimacy. The usurper, and his opponents claiming he's a usurper, both assert that the black throne gives you the right to betray the realm. Opponent: "I'm fine with being extorted and betrayed, just not by you in particular." Voting against the Establishment in an election supports the idea that the elect are allowed to steal all your stuff. Defrauding a vote only works if the vote-winner gets indemnity against dishonourable, traitorous crimes.

 Trying to usurp the liar throne always fails as usurpation, it always reinforces Nameless doctrines.