I sought out the dissident side of society because I value excellence and want to maximize it.
I reject also the dissidents, because they also hate excellence. They, too, are plato's Democratic Man.
There's no reason not to combine excellence and play. Training is supposed to be fun, at the very least because fun training happens more often. Profit feels good. If it feels like work, edge cases aside you're taking a loss.
I could say lots more about this, but why? It's a startlingly deep topic, but I already know what to do. They don't want to know what to do, and if they did know, they would actively avoid it.
If it feels like work, it's probably slavery. Or perhaps [work] has now come to refer solely to slavery. As previously, plato failed to notice the non-boundary between Democratic Man and Tyrannous Man. Democracy == slavery. To truly dissent against Democracy requires dissenting against slavery. Slaves and prey cannot dissent.
Work is based on fear. Fear of starving. Fear of rejection. Fear of being unable to cope.
Play is based in joy. Valuing the valuable.
If you're moralizing, it's fear, not fun. Terror, Phobos. Not value.
Fear of lack of cope goes recursive. It's become unacceptable to lack anything you fundamentally can't accept. Cope is about things you can't intellectually or physically handle. Slave morality. Prey morality.
Slaves aren't poor because they lack wealth. They're poor because they take a vow of poverty. It's immoral for a slave to own anything. For slaves, security is a sin.
Cooperate with cooperators isn't morality, it's prudence. All prescriptive morality is slave morality. If it were good for you, it wouldn't need to be prescribed or enforced. It would pay for itself. Prescriptive morality is inherently criminal.
You shouldn't [cope] with being whipped. It's bad for you. It's ritually unclean. You should kill the slave master or die trying.
Or, more realistically, simply walk away. Turns out the chains are already broken. The jail door is already unlocked. Notice, and just leave. Stand beyond the range of the whip, and you can't get whipped.
Instead, dissidence seems to be an assigned role. Society as cosmic drama, again. Someone has to [contribute] to society by forming the underbelly which the mouthpieces are constantly preaching about. Democratic dissidents don't want to cleave the connection to their society, and playing the role of fake dissident, of embodying the enemy in a politician's power-fantasy morality play, makes them feel a part of something bigger.
Ultimately this role is simply yet another way to Satanically repress excellence. So that everyone can be a slave, everyone must be a slave.
> Instead, dissidence seems to be an assigned role.
ReplyDeleteThe designated losers.
It makes perfect sense that a black government would designate losers and define how they should behave. Micromanaging expressions of resentment, that sort of thing.
ReplyDeleteHowever, revenge is sour. If they weren't absolute losers, they would never accept this assignment.