Look. I don't wanna see that. Neither does anyone else.
If Diogenes doesn't care about what I want to see, why would I care about what he wants? E.g, to go on living? I can 100% ensure he never does it again.
Have to cooperate to be a cooperator. Deviate and be neutralized.
The problem with Athens was that they claimed to be rational yet couldn't explain why Diogenes can't coom in the Forum. All they had was fee-fees, and well, Diogenes had fee-fees too, yanno?
P.S. Remember, yes, we need a Pope to determine who isn't and isn't lying. Diogenes can claim public wanks are incredibly important to him and I'm lying about not wanting to see it; that would mean, to use lolbertardian terms, I'm the one "initiating aggression." I would be trying to find an excuse to hurt him and get away with it. Except, of course, he's the one lying. He can just wank in private. The only thing he can possibly gain out of public wanks is precisely the discomfort it causes. Defection.
There is no machine or algorithm* that can determine who is lying, because [GIGO]. The liar just lies to the machine too, corrupting the output. Hence, must have an adjudicator. Someone has to decide what is garbage and doesn't go in the machine, and given that, they might as well be the machine and decide directly, because [quis custodiet]. If I don't like the Pope's adjudication, the only solution is to leave the Pope's church and get a new Pope. If Diogenes doesn't leave the church (Athens in this case) then we have to assume he broadly accepts the Pope's judgment. Even if there's a mistake, he has to accept it, so as to also accept all the times he's right.
*(Machine made of techniques instead of technology.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
New failcomment system also fails to publish my comments, it's not limited to yours. Keep trying, it will usually work, eventually.
Blogger deliberately trying to kill itself, I expect.
Captchas should be off. If it gives you one anyway, it's against my explicit instructions.