Good Pain vs. Bad Pain Flagellants

You're completely delusional. Society is obsessed with comfort. We are more comfortable than any peoples in history. You are not a revolutionary thinker for finding a roundabout way to rediscover normie flavorcuck sentiments
https://nitter.unixfox.eu/VitruvianSpeed/status/1749489714615181602

 The Truth is the enemy of both sides. 

 Good pain, eustress, makes you stronger. Bad pain, distress, makes you weaker. If you run you get the burn. That's good pain. You get stiff the next day. That's good. If you run too far you get the bruise-like throbbing aches and shooting pains. Those are bad.
 Any eustress that doesn't kill you makes you stronger. (Aphorism 8, Twilight...is, as written, an idol. Idolatry.)  The only reason to tolerate distress is overwhelming force.

 If you're not trying to sound mysterious and profound, then you would notice any eustress that's killing you will feel like distress because it is. Fully corrected, fully steelmanned, aphorism 8 says that good stress is good for you. Wow big N, did you come up with that on your own? How many tries did it take?

 Like, it's really not hard? The good pain in fact feels good. Cue midwit meme. Some folk clearly avoid the good pain, and that's because they hate themselves? Are so stupid they can't even take a sophisticated view of their own feelings? I think nobody talks about the fact the good pain is good because those who acknowledge the good think it's so obvious it's not worth mentioning. Socratic failure. The result is the two sides can talk past each other forever without noticing anything wrong (aside from the other side sounding like they use a rat brain to think with).

 Modern Despotic/Fascist society is obsessed not with "comfort" or reducing "stress" but with reducing eustress. It's specifically so that they may accept more distress without going postal.

 Yes, anabology is providing wagecuck cope. He's helping them reduce their eustress. Another example here. They take a tasty diet so they can upgrade their commute from 1.5 hours to 2.5 hours without having a psychotic break and quitting their job.
 Peacocking. Shitty peacocking. If you can accept infinite distress without dying you must be really rich, right? (If you don't loathe the middle class, there's something wrong with you.) Stress maximizing: switch from a more-boring diet to a less-boring diet, so you can accept a honey-do list that's twice as long without a fight. "I cooked you a nice pie, now dust all the cabinets for me." Bitch you also ate the pie...
 Dusting invisible cabinet-tops is the point of an anabology 'tasty' diet.

 

 However, you really shouldn't eat food that tastes bad. Bad tastes are the body telling you about distress. 

 Note the distinction between making "tasty food" a moral imperative and [cue midwit meme] not eating bad-tasting food.

 If toothpaste or mouthwash burn your mouth, it's because it's bad for you. You're not proving you're hard, you're damaging your tissues for no reason. Even if you were proving you're hard, you shouldn't. Note how the psychology article would never condemn mouthwash - they're not against pain per se, they're only against inefficient forms of pain that make you less able to accept whipping by the slavemaster. If someone is "traumatized" then we have to forgive them for not picking up a 9-5, or else we would have to drop the "(Nobody could possibly be stupid enough to believe) we're compassionate," bit.

 Virtue-signalling is the opposite of virtue-behaving. Signallers have to talk because their actions don't speak for themselves...not the way they want them to speak, lol.