Update to Black Holes Don't Exist

I previously came up with ludicrous Rube Goldberg machines to try to extract infinite energy from a black hole, but in fact it's very simple: it blueshifts light to infinity, meaning if a single photon crosses the event horizon, it gains infinite mass, the event horizon expands to cover the entire universe, and everything ends. You can tell black holes don't exist because anything else exists. Therefore, as before, only very dark grey holes exist. P.S. I'm doing a rep of set 4.

Another way of characterizing an escape velocity higher than c is to say the light is redshifted to infinity; escaping photons have a frequency of 0 and therefore aren't escaping; or, escaping photons are forbidden. However, this must mean infalling photons are blueshifted to infinity, and therefore strike the event horizon with infinite energy. 

If the event horizon can absorb matter and become more massive, then it will almost instantly absorb infinite energy and become infinitely massive; the only escape is to deny that anything can cross the event horizon. Which makes sense because there's infinite distance between you and the event horizon. It should take infinity years for anything to cross the event horizon, including the particles that make up the black hole in the first place. 

Local gravity can increase without limit, meaning it can get stronger than the strongest countervailing force, neutron degeneracy pressure. However, gravity cannot get stronger than the time dilation caused by gravity itself. Gravity can't get so strong it overpoweres gravity. For some reason. At some point, when density increases by an infinitesimal amount, time dilation increases by a finite amount, causing time to functionally halt for the infalling matter, from the perspective of distant observers. And yes, this was a known fact to prewar physicists. 

There's also a state-change problem: as two neutrons approach their mutual barycentre and approach its Schwarzschild radius, where does the event horizon form? It can't form between them, as there is no mass between the two particles - . (Allegedly; more on this in postscript.) It has to suddenly pop into existence on the outside of the particles; in other words, for black holes to exist, density has to be nonlocal. Which is lol. Apex kek. If you think about deformation of space, then the gravity well has to very suddenly change from finite to infinite from one Planck second to the next. It's genuinely ludicrous; modern physics clearly attracts so many crackpots because mainstream physicists are all crackpots already. They're merely better at hiding it than the brain cancer patients. 

All singularities are naked. The event horizon isn't a cloak, it is itself a singularity. The effects of a singularity are other singularities, no exceptions. You can tell black holes don't exist because structured minds are around to discuss whether black holes exist; something in nature must prevent singularities from forming. As such, while very dense matter can arbitrarily approach becoming a black hole, it will always remain merely very very dark grey.

P.P.S.  More/worse: if black holes exist, every particle is a black hole. The key feature of a black hole isn't mass per se, but density; every point particle has infinite density, therefore should have an event horizon, and therefore every particle should be an identical black hole. If it is possible for two particles to have infinite density by sitting on top of each other, it must be possible for one particle sitting on top of itself to have infinite density. Solution: particles aren't points. They are their fields, which have very normal finite parameters. This means there is indeed matter 'between' the two infalling neutrons, as they in fact overlap the whole time.

P.P.P.S. I am reminded that woke postwar nu-physicists have their own special term for heretic: crackpot. You can't just be wrong or mistaken or suffer from an oversight, you're morally depraved if you don't conform to consensus physics.