JBP explicitly asked for the truth. Veritas was like, "Okay," and proceeded to pour high-test truth into his head. JBP refused to give up the lies, and now lives in constant agony due to the truth burning the lies all the time directly inside his skull. His face accurately reflects the sensation.
He might be praying to Satan to take the truths back out, but Satan can't answer anymore.
There's a reason he doesn't have anyone really, really, really controversial on this podcast.
ReplyDeleteHis daughter is kinda bad at arguing but even she would have someone like Rollo Tomassi on her podcast, even if it triggers her. He avoids being triggered.
But it just goes to show. One man can't have all the truth.
Vox Day's recent post destroys JP. It exposed JP as involved in covering up govt pedo rings.
ReplyDeleteSounds like bullshit to me. Vox is jealous. Narcissistic ressentiment.
ReplyDeleteVox always sounds to me like a leftard who worked out that he would get praise from less peasants if he espoused "right wing" ideals. I digress.
ReplyDeleteJBP definitely doesn't believe at all in monarchy, and he definitely absolutely without question cannot draw the conclusion from IQ research that some people are just gonna be peasants, the end - which means his political views are retarded.
Doesn't mean he doesn't have something valuable to offer. Like every person, they have their bias, and it's important to quickly work out where theirs lies so you can avoid listening to their crap takes on it.
You wouldn't ask for Nietzsches advice on relationships with women, would you? Hehehehe
Seems obvious to me that quite a few folk have a vested interest in your room being messy.
ReplyDeleteFor some reason.
No that's a joke, I know why. They need you to be dedicated to busybodying because you can't con an honest man. The more you mind your own business the less they can twist your twisted meddling towards their own ends.
I revisited some of Vox's opinion on JBP and I also watched a video of Michael Knowles critiquing Andrew Tate's positions.
ReplyDeleteIt seems to me that there's a degree of dishonesty in what these figures do, but I think it's tactical dishonest.
Eg, JBP can't give a yes/no answer to "do you believe Jesus Christ was raised from the dead".
Because, I think many of these figures are trying to construct arguments that appeal to nihilist, narcissistic materialists.
If JBP says "yes of course Jesus was raised from the dead" he knows immediately how that will affect characterisations of his persona/ his arguments.
Have to remain a staunch "yes handbags and cash are great things" proponent.
To summarise; yourself, Vox, Jim, etc don't give a shit how they're characterised, and to an extent this weakens your arguments, because - hah you are so right on this - dumb peasants are dumb.
Your thoughts?
Yes.
ReplyDeleteWhether JBP believe in Christ or not, he has to say the same things that he is in fact saying.
Though there's also substantive issues, because JBP is an Egalitarian. He's trying to rehabilitate responsibility and honour and such. However, he refuses to reject the core Catholic premises which contradict these ideas and caused/justified their social decline in the first place.
Which I summarize as: Veritas poured truth directly into his brain, as requested, and JBP regretted asking. JBP refuses to either stop asking or to jettison the beliefs Veritas is setting on fire.
Pride with capital P. He's trying to tell Veritas she's pouring truth wrong and should be pouring different truths. Sorry dude, that's not up to you.
You could also say he's a Gnostic who noticed Gnosticism is bad.
He says Gnosticism is good because lobsters. Gnosticism won, it's high status, it must be good. However, Gnosticism shouldn't reject God or whatever name we put to spirituality in general. You should be a spiritual materialist.
He's obviously deeply injured, and the injuries are self-inflicted.
In particular you can see this manifesting in the way he hasn't resigned his professorship.
ReplyDeleteHe condemns every thing the universities and the university system does, then praises the university for lauding him and giving him money, apparently unaware of the difference between his rhetoric and logic.
ReplyDeleteAh yes. It's egalitarianism. "All people have value to God" yes, true, but the Egalitarian forgets that God values it when you refuse to cooperate and starve. "See, I told you this would happen, thank you".
We forget the concept of "the deserving poor". Charity is for those who, through no fault of their own, are down on their luck. Or even if it is their fault, those willing to play along now.
To play devils advocate, JBP's stupid "troll demon" take at least points to a possibility that he will realise Egalitarianism is dumb. We'll see. I don't have much faith anymore.
He should stick to making materialist acceptable arguments for the spiritual. I am certain that JBP has brought many people to God, despite Vox suggesting the opposite.
Re professorship: Very true, I did not notice this, thank you.
He can afford to lead by example and simply extract himself from the corrupt system, but instead, chooses to hold onto it because "muh tradition".
It's like "go make your own twitter" but I want all my old tweets too can I migrate them?
Look back and risk getting turned into a pillar of salt. Hmm.
To be less rough, you're allowed to spend money on the poor as long as you know them personally.
ReplyDeleteTo be precise, it has to be your own money, and you have to see what the money is in fact spent on. This introduces responsibility and thus discipline.
Most sell their soul to the Devil in exchange for being seen as a good person. Like, bro, at least sell it for money. They give money to ""charities"" so that they can tell themselves (and therefore others) that they gave money to ""charities."" Indeed spending such irresponsible waste on executive largesse is one of the least destructive things such ""charities"" could do with it.