Optics Makes Free Speech Pointless

Short disproof of subsidized speech as a good: only speech with good optics will win. Only speech with bad optics needs subsidies, but you can't make unpopular speech popular by saying it more loudly, for the same reason you can't legislate back the tides. The only time subsidies matter is when it signals the black government wants the speech and thus indicates it's time to back the strong horse. 

Hey, consider this stunning, mindblowing idea: subsidized speech is always pro-Regime speech. It's like he who pays the piper or something. 

Again, if we're going to subsidize something, let's subsidize silence. Let's get downright inefficient levels of peace and quiet up in here. Fines for everyone who speaks in public, redistributed to all their poor victims. Speech as inherently criminal. 

Elon Musk is fucked because he's an optics cuck.
"To be clear, I am generally pro-FBI, recognizing, of course, that no organization is perfect, including FBI"
He can't call a spade a spade until everyone else has already agreed it's a spade, with a few exceptions. Trend-chaser, not trend-setter. Useless. 

All the Regime has to do is make his winning move have bad optics, and he won't even be able to consider it. Another theory states that this has already occurred.

More blackpill: look how badly this ponce outranks Dorsey. Dorsey had 16 years and couldn't manage what Musk accomplished in six weeks. He simply doesn't have the agency. These are your peak Americans. It's not like there's a better affordance. There are a few genuinely elite elites but they're all literally psychotic.
Plato was right about a thing: the first thing a philosopher-king wisely does is get as far away from leadership as management as possible. The scam has no hold on them.