Friday, June 18, 2021

0 Isn't a Number, Part 2

All numbers have precision. 0 is 0 ± 0.0000001 or something. The thing after ± is itself never zero. In the case of 0, the precision in relative terms is always [∞]%. The number is perfectly dominated by its uncertainty.

This is probably why the vacuum isn't empty. 0 particles != 0 particles.*

If the possibility of measurement exists at all, there is something there to be measured. You can only have 0 if numbers don't make sense at all in that context - if the question itself is wrong. 

*P.S. When you think true things, the world has a tendency to make sense. When you think false things, it is hard to think of an example.

1 comment:

  1. I told my mother, an avid cook, that cooking isn't rocket science; you never need more than one digit of precision because changing one ingredient by ±10% is unlikely to have a noticeable effect on the final product. She said, "When collecting egg white to whip into meringue, you must let through exactly zero yolk." To which I replied, "Zero's a one-digit number!"

    Zero is a number, just not a number that can be measured. One can say, "The universe contains zero magnetic monopoles" or "The probability of a proton decaying is zero", and these assertions might be true, but they cannot be proven true by measurement alone.

    ReplyDelete

New failcomment system also fails to publish my comments, it's not limited to yours. Keep trying, it will usually work, eventually.
Blogger deliberately trying to kill itself, I expect.
Captchas should be off. If it gives you one anyway, it's against my explicit instructions.