Thursday, June 17, 2021

0 is a Set, Not a Number

My calculator holds 12 digits. In other words, 1 + 10^-13 -1 = 0. In other words, in the context of 1, 10^-13 = 0. Or rather, 10^-13∈ [0]. My calculator also has a limit at 10^-99, meaning x <= 0.9*10^-99 = 0.

You are a finite being and no matter what calculation you do there's a finite accuracy to it. Anything below that accuracy ∈[0]. In other words x/[∞]∈[0]  Mathies are wrong again, it is exactly the case that 1/∞ = 0, except that ∞ and 0 are sets, not numbers. [0] is just [∞] viewed upside-down. Or, equivalently, [∞] is just a way of looking at [0]. When you define a [∞], you also unavoidably define a [0] relative to any member of [∞], and vice-versa.

E.g. for my calculator and x <= 0.1, 10^99 ∈ [∞]. Asking it 0.1/10^99 gives the answer 0. Sure I can handle way more nines than that, 10^9999999999999999999999, but eventually I get bored of writing nines and we've found [∞] in the context of me.

If that's not general enough for you, then generalize it yourself. 


2 comments:

  1. So if 1/∞ = 0, then 1/0 = ∞?

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1 / a member of [0] is a member of [∞], yeah.
    E.g. for my calculator, 1 / 10^-100 = 10^100, which it also can't work with.

    ReplyDelete

New failcomment system also fails to publish my comments, it's not limited to yours. Keep trying, it will usually work, eventually.
Blogger deliberately trying to kill itself, I expect.
Captchas should be off. If it gives you one anyway, it's against my explicit instructions.