What Idiocracy Got Wrong

Openly using terms like "φαγ" and "retarded" is obviously right-wing chud, not left-wing chud.
Excuse me, less-leftist chud, as opposed to leftist chud. Dr. Lexus would call you a racist or whatever. He would use "chud," perhaps. Everyone would have blue hair. They wouldn't watch, "Ow, my balls," they would watch chickens being tortured instead, then say, "There outta be a law!" and go back to watching hogs get tormented. They would impress each other with how horrified they were, but if a genuine animal-welfare group started canvassing for donations they would all find excuses to keep the money for themselves. Maybe a rant about how congress is corrupt or something, followed by demanding free brawndo.

Ukraine War Thaumaturgically.

Azov are actually commies, not nazis.
Putin's denazification initiative is in fact a decommification initiative.
In other words, he's Joseph McCarthy, but with nuclear weapons.
No wonder America is freaking right the fuck out.

The Heavens Wish to be Generous

The heavens are generous because they desire to be generous. They want to look in the mirror and see generous entities. It's practically your duty to accept their gifts. It's not being selfish or greedy, it's about not embracing rejection or privation.

To be generous, the giver needs someone to be generous at. They require a receiver. Do you wish to deprive the heavens of their receiver? Especially when it means giving up wealth with few to no strings attached? Rejecting their generosity is both stupid and mean.

Do as you're told: be rich.

Facists know this: they reject the ridiculous generosity of the Sol, allegorically rejecting the bounty of the heavens. "Skin cancer! Blah gurg arglebargle!" No, they want to be vampires and they want to make you a vampire too.

"Heaven brings forth innumerable things to nurture man." True.
"Man has nothing good with which to recompense Heaven." Twisted.

The point of generosity is not to be repaid. Reciprocalism is hardly bad, but it's merely slow-motion trade. It's not a gift. It's a different thing.

The point of Man is to be someone upon which generosity can be lavished, so that those entities who wish to be generous can have the Free Will to be generous. The recompense is allowing heavenly beings to self-actualize.

If anything, among the gifts the heavens abundantly provide is the gift of humility, a most powerful and glorious virtue. Heavenly entities are incomprehensibly wealthy. The energy Sol provides to Earth, endless and vast as it seems to us, is barely a penny or two to the total energy of Sol. What could a mere grass monkey possibly give in return that would be at all meaningful? Humbly accept you couldn't pay it back even if you wanted to. 

If you had something to offer in return, it wouldn't be truly, profoundly generous. They're offering it because you have no recompense. That's not a failing, that's the point. 

Humbly accept the infinite wealth they wish to offer you. 

 

 

P.S. Need a rectification for the name [self-actualize]. The idea correct, the words corrupt. Talk like a person, not a wanker.

Devil Food

It is said that devils feed on negative emotions. I feel this is correct. 

But what is a "negative" emotion? Sounds like moralizing, and morality isn't real. 

At first, you might at least say they're unpleasant emotions, but Siddhartha was right: they aren't inherently unpleasant, that's something you project onto them. Folk voluntarily seek out fear by watching horror movies or by reading a newspaper - it's not inherently "negative," and likewise I personally enjoy getting angry. 

The "negativity" comes from the perception of being damaged, but in the majority of cases it is mere perception. It's not the emotion that's negative, but the injury. Failure is indeed inherently negative. Being weak is indeed a sin. 

On the contrary, the emotion is there to help you avoid being injured. Simplifying for brevity, fear informs you of hazards. Anger informs you of treachery. Guilt informs you of your own will to treachery. Your emotions are on your side. 

You are what you eat, or perhaps it's more accurate to say you eat what you are. Devils feed on negative emotion because they are formed of negative emotion. 

There is one inherently wrong feeling: self-hatred. 

E.g. saying emotions, which are on your side, are "negative." Stuff that's on your side is bad? That's a self-hatred. 

Self-hatred is self-negating. If you hate yourself, one of the things you hate is the self-hatred. You believe you yourself are wrong, which means you think the self-hatred is wrong, and thus you believe you shouldn't hate yourself. Inherently insane. 

 

Devils are inherently avatars of self-hatred. This is why they are weak. As expected, they are inherently sinful. For them, to renounce weakness is to renounce existing. The Bible claims any idiot can rebuff a devil, and this is correct. They embrace failure and suffering; if you do not likewise embrace their failure and suffering, you give them nothing to work with. If instead you validate their self-condemnation, then they are condemned. "I suck." "I agree, you suck." Game over.

True devils are extremely rare. They are self-destructive, so their masses cannot accumulate over time. For the most part if you don't intentionally seek them out you will not encounter them at all. Even rebuffing them is unpleasant; why do it if it's also unnecessary?

Hatred is a thing that exists, and selves are a possible thing it could be directed towards, and I suspect this is related to the reason devils have to exist in the first place.

Alger Hiss Was Not a Spy & Genetic Roots of Communist Tyranny

Passing "secrets" to the Soviets was explicitly what he was hired to do. He was more of an under-the-table diplomat than a spy.

Only a spy in the same sense that every diplomat is a spy.

Sure you can argue about whether the Soviets were playing the Americans or Americans were playing the Soviets, but nobody was confused about who was at the table. It wasn't hard, since everyone was at the table. Approximately, FDR considered Stalin an American spy, never mind everyone else. 

He was (rather, they were) rigging the game because rigging the game was the plan. Very Anglo. Whoever got behind would be allowed to play catch-up so the game could continue. We were always at war with East Asia. 

 

For what it's worth, I say Communism is American as apple pie. Lenin and Stalin knew exactly what their plan would entail. Causing immense misery was the point. Stalin was a bank robber before he was a head of state. Lenin was exiled for being hazardous waste. Criminal underclass. 

Stalin was never Russian. Stalin was wildly Americanized.
Lenin was a Euromutt who likely suffered regression to the mean and the post-vigor hybrid degeneration. He was a miscegenated mutant with no homeland; a foreigner no matter where he ended up. His mother was a low-end aristocrat and his father was an upjumped peasant; these kinds of bastards are exactly what you should expect if you muddy your noble blood with commoners, no matter how capable that particular commoner is. Social mobility is supposed to be slow; fast mobility is a scam.
In shocking news, the Russian-Swede-Mongol-CryptoJew ended up following a German who published from England. You think you're a [melting pot]? Look at this nonsense.
Tell me you have no idea what your neighbours are like without telling me you have no idea what your neighbours are like.
I said [genetic roots] but clearly the problem is miscegenation causes alienation. This goes double if you're in part an inherently deracinized Gyew.

Reminder: Exit is necessary because corruption is inevitable. If you can't [nope] your country if it gets Lenin'd, then your zeroth priority is to [nope] your country ASAP, before it inevitably gets Lenin'd.

Puritanism is Utopianism

"Puritanism. The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy."
-Mencken

Most recently in reference to nuclear war vs. a non-Nato Ukraine.
"How can you be happy when there exists racism, sexism, white supremacy...
"We must punish you"

Don't you get it? If anything isn't perfect yet, it must be your fault. The problem is the Puritan himself isn't happy, and obviously happiness is natural and happens by itself. You must be punished, and then enslaved to work towards perfection, so we can finally reach Utopia. 

Clearly, Utopia is the default. E.g. State of Nature. If we are not currently in Utopia, it must be due to the evil opposition of wreckers and heretics. Are you not fully on board? Only 99.8%, not 100%? Well it must be on you, because if you stopped opposing Utopia, it would plain simply occur.

Perfectly rational, see?

Extremely childish rationality, but rational given their extreme disabilities. Fundamentalism is cope for small minds who should never have been let out of the house.

"Covid is terrifying but global thermonuclear war is a moral obligation."

https://twitter.com/Outsideness/status/1505802533176246272

As I keep saying, they have the opposite-day reaction to threats. Ncov was safe, so they freaked out as much as possible. The virus wasn't doing it for them, so they went for stress-induced kills. Destroy as many livelihoods as possible, because humans need a job & to contribute to the tribe, and peasants can't just assign themselves jobs. If the virus was actually dangerous they would have held hard to "just a flu bro" but done the opposite of taking off the cloth masks during the parties; they would have closed their own neighbourhoods to infectious traffic.

Global thermonuclear war would indeed kill a whole lot of people, so they're way in favour of it. Indeed they're down on anyone who wants to avoid it. Though at least in this case there's the counter-indicator: they will countenance zero personal risk. If there's the slightest chance of being domed by a missile the trigger man won't pull the trigger. 

If Putin would backroom promise to only nuke flyover country and avoid e.g. Georgetown DC, they would go for it in a heartbeat. And then betray him, of course, which Putin knows just fine. This is why dishonourable behaviour is unwise; it cuts off your options and makes you weak.

Journalism vs. Gresham's Law

Bad words drive out good. 

Debasement of language. 

Not an accident. Very intentional. Good words are a threat to the Regime and must be suppressed. Luckily it turns out the peasantry has an endless appetite for bad words in any case. 

Driving out good words with an endless supply of bad is what free "speech" is for.

Hot tip: don't form a regime so delicate that a decent supply of good prose is an existential threat to your society. 

One of the reasons you need to have a real neighbourhood, with both physical and allegorical fences, is because bad words drive out good. Talk is cheap and thus oversupplied, and in particular the worst words are oversupplied. Need to keep this sewage out with some sort of dike. A manned and well-maintained dike, or your neighbourhood will become a slum.

However, publishing is not cheap. Hosting (or paper) and bandwidth (delivery in general) cost money. If the words aren't profitable they will go out of business. In this case market discipline destroys the bad words. Big 'ol prayer to Gnon.

Thus the State must destroy market discipline and underhandedly fund "free" publishing, re-asserting the dominance of bad words over good.