tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5204863782883637837.post1231643827225142430..comments2024-03-27T20:51:11.303-04:00Comments on Accepting Ignorance: New Epistemic PrincipleAlrenoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11119846531341190283noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5204863782883637837.post-35413274596025711272021-01-10T15:08:36.103-05:002021-01-10T15:08:36.103-05:00You mean that all thinking you don't perceive,...You mean that all thinking you don't perceive, or remains unknown to you, is incompetent thinking? Otherwise you'd know what someone was thinking? So, the other person tells you what they're thinking, say. What if it's still incompetent? Can you then understand what they are thinking, since they've described it to you, even though it's as yet still incompetent? Do you then offer training to correct the incompetence? In which you show them why their thinking is incompetent and how they can repair it with training you or someone like you would offer? Do they tell you something specific, in order to clarify to you the specific confusion, or do you just tell them that what they're thinking is incompetent in general? I realize this is incompetent, since I'm not able to be sure what you're talking about. So you help 'job-unblock' and other things that need unblocking? If the person doesn't know even what you would need to know to assure them of success, why wouldn't it be a vast array of things? Wouldn't you have to be specific and get answers to what they're thinking or think they're thinking in order to convince them that that way of thinking didn't make sense? How would they know you could make them more successful than Trump unless you proved you were yourself successful? Just saying you are capable of all these things does not prove it, so don't you need a better sales pitch? They'd have to have a good reason to trust that you knew how to give them what they need, and you alone or someone you also recommended. How do you convince them they need to lay themselves open to your judgment of competence or incompetence? Would you just tell me "I don't know what you're thinking, so it has to be incompetent?" Does it have to be thinking about something as specific as joblessness or some other felt failure? <br /><br />Trump can only be said to have partially failed. Do you know what he's thinking about now? Just because he said he wouldn't 'interrupt the peaceful transfer of power' and lost his Twitter account does not mean he failed in a general sense, except as president. He's not capable of perceiving anything he does as failure because of external action, is he? If he was 'a true patriot', how can he have failed just because of the general consensus...or is it the general consensus. What I read is that nothing has stopped this movement from propagating itself, and that he is still president. And even if he is no longer living in the White House, why, with such a following, who, incidentally, do not agree with you that he has failed even if they say things like 'stolen election'. Some may see him as 'no longer living at the White House' if that transpires, but that doesn't mean they see him as 'failed'. <br /><br />This is incompetent because you may be interested in being lucid only to those who consciously belong to the same ideologies, sensibilities, so I am just tracing the post for the hell of it. I wonder who would tell you all the things you need to know, why they'd think there was no alternative.Parisiannoreply@blogger.com